Surgical treatment for shepherd’s crook deformity in fibrous dysplasia: THERE IS NO BEST, ONLY BETTER
- 175 Downloads
The optimal strategy for shepherd’s crook deformity correction remains technically challenging. In particular, it is difficult to perform an accurate osteotomy based on the pre-operative correction plan. Moreover, the choice of ideal hardware remains unclear. In addition, when combined with the deformity of knee joint, the sequence of deformity correction is another overlooked factor when making a correction strategy.
From February 2012 to March 2014, we retrospectively examined a cases series in our department involving the creation of three-dimensional (3D) printing osteotomy templates and inner fixation for shepherd’s crook deformity in fibrous dysplasia.
A total of ten patients of shepherd’s crook deformity were enrolled in this study. The neck shaft angle was corrected from a mean value of 88.1° (range, 73–105°) pre-operatively to a mean value of 128.5° (range, 120–135°) post-operatively; no marked loss in the value was observed (mean, 123.7°; range, 115–130°) at the final follow-up. In addition, compared with patients using dynamic hip screw (DHS), longer operation time and additional blood loss were recorded in patients using intramedullary nail (IN). Moreover, after correction of shepherd’s crook deformity, two patients were observed more predominant on their pre-existing valgus knee deformity.
3D printing osteotomy templates facilitate the correction of shepherd’s crook deformity. Dynamic hip screw (DHS), combined with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation, yields excellent outcomes and ensures easy placement and non-intramedullary manipulation, lower bleeding volume, and reduced operation time. Prior to the correction of shepherd’s crook deformity, the mechanical axis of the lower limb should be carefully examined, and any evidence of valgus knee deformity should be addressed in advance.
KeywordsShepherd’s crook deformity Fibrous dysplasia 3D printing osteotomy template Hardware Knee deformity
We would like to give our sincere thanks to Dr. Qing Liu, Dr. Wei Luo, Dr. Zhan Liao, Dr. Feng Long, and Dr. Jian Tian for data collection and Miss. Jing Wan (the wife of Dr. Jun Wan) for her selfless support during the study.
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81301671).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by ethical committee of Xiangya Hospital (document attached as follows).
- 1.DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF (2005) Fibrous dysplasia. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1848–1864Google Scholar
- 9.Zhang XL, Chen CY, Duan H, Tu CQ (2016) Multiple valgus osteotomies combined with intramedullary nail for shepherd's crook deformity in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia: a case series and review of the literature. Int J Clin Exp Med 9:1942–1952Google Scholar
- 24.Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs: preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:48–64Google Scholar
- 25.Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetswoth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465Google Scholar