Multicentre comparative study of Z-shape elevating–pulling reduction and skull traction reduction for treatment of lower cervical locked facets
- 134 Downloads
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of Z-shape elevating–pulling reduction as compared to that of conventional skull traction in the treatment of lower cervical locked facet.
Patients with cervical locked facet (n = 63) were retrospectively enrolled from four medical centers and divided into two groups according to the pre-operative reduction method used: Z-shape elevating–pulling reduction (Z-shape elevating group; n = 20) or traditional skull traction reduction (skull traction group; n = 43).
The success rates, efficacy of reduction, and safety were compared between the two groups. The success rates were significantly better in the Z-shape elevating group than in the skull traction group: 87.5% (7/8) vs. 35.3% (6/17) for unilateral locked facet reduction (P = 0.03) and 100% (12/12) vs. 69.2% (18/26) for bilateral locked facet reduction (P = 0.04). There was no obvious change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade after the reduction in either group. Combined surgery was necessary in 5% in the Z-shape elevating group vs. 27.9% in the skull traction group. Imaging showed that the segment angle and horizontal displacement were significantly improved after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Follow-up with radiography showed good recovery of the cervical spine sequence; all internal fixation sites were stable, with no loosening, prolapse, or breakage of internal fixators.
Halo vest–assisted Z-shape elevating–pulling reduction appears to be a simple, safe, and effective technique for pre-operative reduction of lower cervical locked facets.
KeywordsSubaxial cervical dislocation Locked facet Halo-vest Z-shape elevating–pulling reduction Skull traction
This work was supported by the Shantou University Medical College Clinical Research Enhancement Initiative [grant number 201407] and the Shantou City Science and Technology Plan Major Project, Guangdong Province, China [grant number 20140305].
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution. All patients signed informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College. All patients signed informed consent.
- 1.Wilson JR, Vaccaro A, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Shaffrey C, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Arnold P, Massicotte EM, Lewis S, Rampersaud R, Okonkwo DO, Fehlings MG (2013) The impact of facet dislocation on clinical outcomes after cervical spinal cord injury: results of a multicenter North American prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.WANG H, CAO P, LIANG Y, GONG YC, ZHENG T, ZHANG XK, WU WJ (2007) Analysis of treatment of traumatic subaxial cervical spine instability in 77 patients. Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao Yixueban 27:731–734Google Scholar
- 8.Chen K, Jin AM, Chen Z, Zhang H, Min SX, Xu YF (2011) Large weight skull traction combined with both surgical treatment for cervical fracture dislocation with locked-facet. Zhongguo Jiaoxing Waike Zazhi 19:2041–2044Google Scholar
- 9.Lv DC, Jiang CM, Zhang ZZ, Yu TQ, Sun ZL, Wang LD, Cai RM, Wu RZ (1995) A exploration of treatment of locked facet joints of the cervical spine. Zhonghua Chuangshang Zazhi 11:39–40Google Scholar
- 10.Man Y, Xu GH, Zhang Y, Tang YJ, Huang K (2010) Treatment of fracture and dislocation of the lower cervical spine with locking of articular process. Tongji Daxue Xuebao Yixueban 31:71–74Google Scholar
- 11.Li T, Song YM, Gong Q, Liu LM, Liu H, Zeng JC, Kong QQ (2009) Posterior open reduction under regional anesthesia combined anterior fusion of lower cervical spine locked facet. Jizhu Waike Zazhi 7:274–276Google Scholar
- 12.Wang H, Han GY, Li L, Cui SQ (2009) Anterior “three-dimensional rotation reduction” for lower cervical fracture and dislocation. Jizhu Waike Zazhi 5:269–273Google Scholar
- 13.Xu HZ, Chi YL, Lin Y, Mao FM, Huang QS (2000) Clinical diagnosis and treatment and injury mechanism of unilateral locked facet of cervical spine. Zhonghua Chuangshang Zazhi 16:466–468Google Scholar
- 14.Wang X, Yao G, Chen Y, Wang W, Zeng J (2017) New reduction technique for the treatment of unilateral locked facet joints of the lower cervical spine: a retrospective analysis of 12 cases. Orthopade Aug 14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-017-3456-9
- 15.Yao GF, Wang XJ, Wang WD, Zheng RW, Chen LZ (2015) Halo-vest reduction combined with anterior decompression and internal fixation for lower cervical spine fracture and dislocation. Zhonghua Chuangshang Zazhi 31:695–698Google Scholar
- 16.O'Connor PA, McCormack O, Noël J, McCormack D, O’Byrne J (2003) Anterior displacement correlates with neurological impairment in cervical facet dislocations. Int Orthop 27:190–193Google Scholar