Treatment of infection following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures—results of the ORS/ISFR expert group survey
- 210 Downloads
The lack of universally accepted treatment principles and protocols to manage infected intramedullary (IM) nails following tibial fractures continues to challenge us, eliciting a demand for clear guidelines. Our response to this problem was to create an ORS/ISFR taskforce to identify potential solutions and trends based on published evidence and practices globally.
Materials and methods
A questionnaire of reported treatment methods was created based on a published meta-analysis on the topic. Treatment methods were divided in two groups: A (retained nail) and B (nail removed). Experts scored the questionnaire items on a scale of 1–4 twice, before and after revealing the success rates for each stage of infection. Inter- and intra-observer variability analysis among experts’ personal scores and between experts’ scores was performed. An agreement mean and correlation degree between experts’ scores was calculated. Finally, a success rate report between groups was performed.
Experts underestimated success rate of an individual treatment method compared to published data. The mean difference between experts’ scores and published results was + 26.3 ± 46 percentage points. Inter-observer agreement mean was poor (< 0.2) for both rounds. Intra-observer agreement mean across different treatment methods showed a wide variability (18.3 to 64.8%). Experts agree more with published results for nail removal on stage 2 and 3 infections.
Experts’ and published data strongly agree to retain the implant for stage 1 infections. A more aggressive approach (nail removal) favoured for infection stages 2 and 3. However, literature supports both treatment strategies.
KeywordsTibia infection Intramedullary nailing Nonunion tibia Tibia fractures Treatment algorithm Survey on nonunion
- 3.Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Trauma 18(2):96–101Google Scholar
- 11.Schenker ML, Yannascoli S, Baldwin KD, Ahn J, Mehta S, (2012) Does timing to operative debridement affect infectious complications in open long-bone fractures? A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am, (94)12 p. 1057–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00582.
- 13.Yang Y, et al., (2013) Modified classification and single-stage microsurgical repair of posttraumatic infected massive bone defects in lower extremities. J Recon Microsurg, 29(9) p. 593–600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348064.
- 15.McNally MA, Ferguson JY, Lau ACK, Diefenbeck M, Scarborough M, Ramsden AJ, Atkins BL (2016) Single-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a new absorbable, gentamicin-loaded, calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite. Bone Joint J 98(9):1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.38057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Samuel G, Menon J, Thimmaiah S, et al., (2017) Role of isolated percutaneous autologous platelet concentrate in delayed union of long bones. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2077-7.
- 18.Kertzman P, Császár NB, Furia JP, Schmitz C, (2017) Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is efficient and safe in the treatment of fracture nonunions of superficial bones: a retrospective case series. J Orthop Res, 12(1) p.164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0667-z.
- 19.Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, et al., (2017) Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040.
- 20.Mioc ML, Prejbeanu R, Deleanu B, Anglitoiu B, Haragus H, Niculescu M, (2018) Extra-articular distal tibia fractures-controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2018 Jan 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3775-4.
- 22.Seng P, Traore M, Lavigne JP, Maulin L, Lagier JC, Thiery JF, Levy PY, Roger PM, Bonnet E, Sotto A, Stein A (2017) Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a neglected pathogen of infections involving fracture-fixation devices. Int Orthop 41(6):1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3476-4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar