International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 1449–1454 | Cite as

Which is the optimal orthogeriatric care model to prevent mortality of elderly subjects post hip fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on current clinical practice

  • J. Moyet
  • G. Deschasse
  • B. Marquant
  • P. Mertl
  • Frédéric BlochEmail author
Review Article



While there is a general consensus of the impact of an orthogeriatric organisation in terms of elderly patient mortality post hip fracture, it is unclear which, among these various care models, is the most optimal.


A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the keywords “Femoral fractures or total hip replacements or Accidental, falls” and “Aged, 80 and over” and “Mortality”. The review is presented following PRISMA guidance.


Eighteen studies were identified, published between 1988 and 2015. The number of elderly subjects participating in these studies was between 37 and 951; their mean age was 82.6 ± 7.4 years, and average mortality in these studies was 17.7%.

The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for association between implementation of the orthogeriatric model and mortality in all patients studied were 0.85 (0.74–0.97). In the analysis by subgroup on the type of orthogeriatric model, the group “Orthogeriatric ward” gave homogenous results, with ORs and 95% CIs of 0.62 (0.48–0.80) unlike other models: “Shared care by orthopaedists and geriatricians “and “Geriatric advice in orthopaedic ward”.


Elderly patients with hip fracture admitted early into any sort of orthogeriatric models or more specifically to a dedicated orthogeriatric ward had reduced long-term mortality. This study has to be completed by RCT showing the efficacy of orthogeriatric ward compared to other models using outcomes such as quality of life or functional recovery.


Orthogeriatric care model Systematic review Mortality Meta-analysis 


Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

Pr. Bloch and Drs. Deschasse, Marquant and Moyet declare no conflict of interest. Pr. Mertl reports personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from De Puy, personal fees from Zimmer, personal fees from X-Nov and personal fees from Adler, outside the submitted work.

Supplementary material

264_2018_3928_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 24 kb)
264_2018_3928_MOESM2_ESM.doc (62 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 62 kb)


  1. 1.
    Marks R (2010) Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970–2009. Int J Gen Med 3:1–17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boddaert J, Cohen-Bittan J, Khiami F et al (2014) Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. PLoS One.
  4. 4.
    Tang VL, Sudore R, Cenzer IS et al (2017) Rates of recovery to pre-fracture function in older persons with hip fracture: an observational study. J Gen Intern Med 32:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilchrist WJ, Newman RJ, Hamblen DL, Williams BO (1988) Prospective randomised study of an orthopaedic geriatric inpatient service. BMJ 297:1116–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med.
  7. 7.
    Cook D, Guyatt G, Laupacis A, Sackett D (1992) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 102:305s–311sGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Begg C, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 315:1371–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barone A, Giusti A, Pizzonia M, Razzano M, Palummeri E, Pioli G (2006) A comprehensive geriatric intervention reduces short and long-term mortality in older people with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1145–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhattacharyya R, Agrawal Y, Elphick H, Blundell C (2013) A unique orthogeriatric model: a step forward in improving the quality of care for hip fracture patients. Int J Surg 11:1083–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cogan L, Martin AJ, Kelly LA, Duggan J, Hynes D, Power D (2010) An audit of hip fracture services in the Mater Hospital Dublin 2001 compared with 2006. Ir J Med Sci 179:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deschodt M, Braes T, Broos P et al (2011) Effect of an inpatient geriatric consultation team on functional outcome, mortality, institutionalization, and readmission rate in older adults with hip fracture: a controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:1299–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fisher AA, Davis MW, Rubenach SE, Sivakumaran S, Smith PN, Budge MM (2006) Outcomes for older patients with hip fractures: the impact of orthopedic and geriatric medicine cocare. J Orthop Trauma 20:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL (2009) Impact of a comanaged geriatric fracture center on short-term hip fracture outcomes. Arch Int Med 169:1712–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gregersen M, Morch MM, Hougaard K, Damsgaard EM (2012) Geriatric intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture in an orthopedic ward. J Inj Violence Res 4:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grund S, Roos M, Duchene W, Schuler M (2015) Treatment in a center for geriatric traumatology. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112:113–119Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hempsall VJ, Robertson DR, Campbell MJ, Briggs RS (1990) Orthopaedic geriatric care—is it effective? A prospective population-based comparison of outcome in fractured neck of femur. J R Coll Physicians Lond 24:47–50Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ho WW, Kwan Dai DL, Liu KW et al (2009) To investigate the effect and cost-effectiveness of implementing an orthogeriatric intervention for elderly patients with acute hip fracture: the experience in Hong Kong. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:2153–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R (2000) Randomised, clinically controlled trial of intensive geriatric rehabilitation in patients with hip fracture: subgroup analysis of patients with dementia. BMJ 321:1107–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan R, Fernandez C, Kashifl F, Shedden R, Diggory P (2002) Combined orthogeriatric care in the management of hip fractures: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:122–124Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suhm N, Kaelin R, Studer P et al (2014) Orthogeriatric care pathway: a prospective survey of impact on length of stay, mortality and institutionalisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vidan M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J (2005) Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1476–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watne LO, Torbergsen AC, Conroy S et al (2014) The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial). BMC Med.
  28. 28.
    Zeltzer J, Mitchell RJ, Toson B, Harris IA, Ahmad L, Close J (2014) Orthogeriatric services associated with lower 30-day mortality for older patients who undergo surgery for hip fracture. Med J Aust 201:409–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johansen A (2010) The future of orthogeriatrics. Age Ageing 3:664–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grigoryan, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28:e49–e55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pepersack T (2013) Orthogeriatrics: supportive evidence for the process. Rev Med Brux 34:38–45Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Moyet
    • 1
  • G. Deschasse
    • 1
  • B. Marquant
    • 1
  • P. Mertl
    • 2
  • Frédéric Bloch
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Geriatric medicineUniversity Hospital of Amiens-PicardieAmiensFrance
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Amiens-PicardieAmiensFrance
  3. 3.Department of GerontologyUniversity Hospital Amiens-Picardie - Hôpital NordAmiens Cedex 1France

Personalised recommendations