Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 12, pp 2797–2806 | Cite as

Knee size chart nomogram for evaluation of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in knees with or without history of patellofemoral instability

  • Jacques Hernigou
  • Esfandiar Chahidi
  • Medhi Bouaboula
  • Eric Moest
  • Antoine Callewier
  • Theofylaktos Kyriakydis
  • Dimitrios Koulalis
  • Olivier Bath
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Lateralized tibial tubercle is a cause of patellar instability. Before proceeding with reduction of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, surgeons prefer to know whether this distance is pathologic. However, the pathological value remains discussed and may vary with the size of the knee.

Methods

We sought to determine variability in the traditional TT-TG distance versus the anthropometric knee size, using dimensions of the distal part of the femur and proximal part of the tibia of 85 CT scans of the knees in two groups of knees, one normal group without history of patellofemoral instability and one pathologic group with history of instability.

Results

The average TT-TG distance measured 13 mm in normal knees and 16.4 mm in pathologic knees. The variability in measurements between normal and pathologic knees varied respectively between ± 5 and ± 15 mm, with as consequence absence of threshold value between normal and pathologic knees. These measurements were supplemented by an analysis of a size ratio coefficient. In the normal group without history of instability, linear regression analysis showed that patients with larger knees tended to have higher TT-TG distances and that the values are associated with the mean ML femoro-tibial width (p = 0.014; Pearson coefficient = 0.4). The knees with history of instability also keep proportional increase of TT-TG with the size of the knee as the knees without history of instability. We developed a nomogram to more appropriately represent the normal values for a given size of the knee. Application of the nomographic model on the CT scan TT-TG data of the patients who have knee instability allows the orthopaedic surgeon to associate the TT-TG distance with the knee size and to evaluate the medial transfer corresponding to the knee size.

Conclusions

The average TT-TG distances in normal and pathologic knees were not identical for each size of the knees.

Keywords

Patellofemoral instability Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance Tibial tubercule transfer Patellofemoral dislocation Knee size 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Colvin AC, West RV (2008) Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2751–2762.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML et al (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32:1114–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546503260788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li X, Nielsen NM, Zhou H et al (2013) Surgical treatment of a chronically fixed lateral patella dislocation in an adolescent patient. Orthop Rev 5:45–47.  https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2013.e9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salonen EE, Magga T, Sillanpää PJ et al (2017) Traumatic patellar dislocation and cartilage injury: a follow-up study of long-term cartilage deterioration. Am J Sports Med 45:1376–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516687549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elias DA, White LM, Fithian DC (2002) Acute lateral patellar dislocation at MR imaging: injury patterns of medial patellar soft-tissue restraints and osteochondral injuries of the inferomedial patella. Radiology 225:736–743.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2253011578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nomura E, Inoue M, Kurimura M (2003) Chondral and osteochondral injuries associated with acute patellar dislocation. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 19:717–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vollnberg B, Koehlitz T, Jung T et al (2012) Prevalence of cartilage lesions and early osteoarthritis in patients with patellar dislocation. Eur Radiol 22:2347–2356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2493-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosso F, Rossi R, Governale G et al (2017) Tibial tuberosity anteromedialization for patellofemoral chondral disease. Am J Sports Med 363546517690387.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517690387
  9. 9.
    Lobner S, Krauss C, Reichwein F et al (2017) Surgical treatment of patellar instability: clinical and radiological outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tuberosity medialisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2705-z
  10. 10.
    Goutallier D, Bernageau J, Lecudonnec B (1978) The measurement of the tibial tuberosity. Patella groove distanced technique and results (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 64:423–428Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 2:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camathias C, Pagenstert G, Stutz U et al (2016) The effect of knee flexion and rotation on the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 24:2811–2817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3508-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dietrich TJ, Betz M, Pfirrmann CWA et al (2014) End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG) in asymptomatic volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 22:214–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2357-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CWA (2015) Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint alignment. Eur Radiol 25:3398–3404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3756-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Izadpanah K, Weitzel E, Vicari M et al (2014) Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 22:2655–2661.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2537-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kulkarni S, Shetty AP, Alva KK et al (2016) Patellar instability in Indian population: relevance of tibial tuberosity and trochlear groove distance. SICOT-J 2:14.  https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016008 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohammadinejad P, Shekarchi B (2016) Value of CT scan-assessed tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in identification of patellar instability. Radiol Med (Torino) 121:729–734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0647-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zivicnjak M, Smolej Narancić N, Szirovicza L et al (2008) Gender-specific growth patterns of transversal body dimensions in Croatian children and youth (2 to 18 years of age). Coll Antropol 32:419–431PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan EF, Harjanto R, Asahara H et al (2012) Structural and functional maturation of distal femoral cartilage and bone during postnatal development and growth in humans and mice. Orthop Clin North Am 43:173–185, v.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2012.01.005 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickens AJ, Morrell NT, Doering A et al (2014) Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: defining normal in a pediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:318–324.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dornacher D, Reichel H, Kappe T (2016) Does tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) correlate with knee size or body height? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 24:2861–2867.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3526-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pennock AT, Alam M, Bastrom T (2014) Variation in tibial tubercle-trochlear groove measurement as a function of age, sex, size, and patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 42:389–393.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513509058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Balcarek P, Jung K, Frosch K-H, Stürmer KM (2011) Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med 39:1756–1761.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511404883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferlic PW, Runer A, Dirisamer F et al (2017) The use of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove indices based on joint size in lower limb evaluation. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3531-1
  25. 25.
    Hingelbaum S, Best R, Huth J et al (2014) The TT-TG index: a new knee size adjusted measure method to determine the TT-TG distance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 22:2388–2395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3204-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Caton J (1989) Method of measuring the height of the patella. Acta Orthop Belg 55:385–386Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bruce WD, Stevens PM (2004) Surgical correction of miserable malalignment syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 24:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cooke TD, Price N, Fisher B, Hedden D (1990) The inwardly pointing knee. An unrecognized problem of external rotational malalignment. Clin Orthop:56–60Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee TQ, Morris G, Csintalan RP (2003) The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 33:686–693.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nelitz M, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SRM, Dornacher D (2015) Combined supracondylar femoral derotation osteotomy and patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation and severe femoral anteversion syndrome: surgical technique and clinical outcome. Int Orthop 39:2355–2362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2859-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steensen RN, Bentley JC, Trinh TQ et al (2015) The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 43:921–927.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514563904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tensho K, Akaoka Y, Shimodaira H et al (2015) What components comprise the measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in a patellar dislocation population? J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1441–1448.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barnes CL, Iwaki H, Minoda Y et al (2010) Analysis of sex and race and the size and shape of the distal femur using virtual surgery and archived computed tomography images. J Surg Orthop Adv 19:200–208Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xie X, Lin L, Zhu B et al (2014) Will gender-specific total knee arthroplasty be a better choice for women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24:1341–1349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1396-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yan M, Wang J, Wang Y et al (2014) Gender-based differences in the dimensions of the femoral trochlea and condyles in the Chinese population: correlation to the risk of femoral component overhang. Knee 21:252–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Hernigou
    • 1
  • Esfandiar Chahidi
    • 2
  • Medhi Bouaboula
    • 3
  • Eric Moest
    • 1
  • Antoine Callewier
    • 1
  • Theofylaktos Kyriakydis
    • 4
  • Dimitrios Koulalis
    • 5
  • Olivier Bath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology SurgeryLouis Caty hospital, Epicura BaudourSaint-GhislainBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics, School of MedicineFree university of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyGeorge Pompidou European hospitalParisFrance
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology SurgeryErasme HospitalBrusselsBelgium
  5. 5.1st Department of Orthopaedics, School of MedicineUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations