Coronal plane alignment of the lower limbs in patients with unilateral developmental hip dislocation
- 109 Downloads
We aimed to identify the coronal plane alignment of lower limbs in patients with unilateral developmental hip dislocation (UDHD) and observe the difference between Hartofilakidis type II and III.
Patients and methods
The radiographic data of 76 patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed, including the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA).
The valgus alignment on ipsilateral side was most frequently seen in both Hartofilakidis type II (51.3%) and type III groups (67.6%), whereas for the contralateral side, the neutral alignment in type II group (69.2%) and varus alignment in type III group (51.4%) were most commonly observed. Both the mLDFA and aLDFA of the ipsilateral side were significantly smaller than the contralateral side.
UDHD patients may present with lower limb malalignment on both sides. The ipsilateral valgus alignment is the most common deformity. On the contralateral side, Hartofilakidis type III patients may be more prone to be varus than type II patients. The lower limb malalignment and deformity of the ipsilateral distal femur should be considered during surgery involving hip, knee, or femur.
KeywordsDevelopmental hip dislocation Unilateral Lower limb Alignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We received the ethics committee review board approval from our institution before the initiation of this study.
- 4.Yan F, Chen G, Yang L, He R, Gu L, Wang F (2014) A reduction technique of arthroplasty without subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy for the treatment of developmental high dislocation of hip: a case series of 28 hips. J Arthroplast 29(12):2289–2293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ (1978) The natural history of congenital dislocation of the hip: a critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res;(137):154–162Google Scholar
- 15.Zampogna B, Vasta S, Amendola A, Uribe-Echevarria Marbach B, Gao Y, Papalia R, Denaro V (2015) Assessing lower limb alignment: comparison of standard knee X-ray vs long leg view. Assessing lower limb alignment: comparison of standard knee X-ray vs long leg view. Iowa Orthop J 35:49–54PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ganz R, Slongo T, Siebenrock KA, Turchetto L, Leunig M (2012) Surgical technique: the capsular arthroplasty: a useful but abandoned procedure for young patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):2957–2967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2444-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Paley D (2003) Principles of deformity correction. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 25.Cooke TDV, Scudamore A (2003) Healthy knee alignment and mechanics. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE et al (eds) The adult knee. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 175–186Google Scholar
- 26.Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res;(255):215–227Google Scholar
- 27.Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26573 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar