International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1051–1060 | Cite as

The predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study

  • Florent Franck
  • Hervé Ouanezar
  • Alexandre Jacquel
  • Vincent Pibarot
  • Julien Wegrzyn
Original Paper
  • 226 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The decision to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the outcome and survivorship of the native patella in computer-assisted TKA (CAS TKA) implanted for primary knee osteoarthritis, and to determine the predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR).

Methods

A prospective cohort of 273 cementless ultra-congruent mobile-bearing CAS TKA implanted without patellar resurfacing was included in our total joint registry. Patients were evaluated with the International Knee Society (IKS) and Hospital for Special Surgery Patellar (HSSP) scores. Radiographic evaluation was focused on the patellofemoral (PF) compartment to assess: the patellar dysplasia (Wiberg classification), PF osteoarthritis (Iwano classification), femoral trochlear dysplasia (femoral sulcus angle), patellar maltracking (patellar tilt and lateralization), and patella height (Blackburne-Peel ratio).

Results

At a six-year median follow-up, the CAS TKA survivorship using SPR as end-point was 95% (range, 91–99%). The IKS and HSSP improved significantly after SPR (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). No significant difference in the IKS and HSSP was detected between TKA with native patella and SPR-TKA at latest follow-up. Importantly, four pre-operative radiographic PF parameters were significantly associated with SPR: higher stages of patellar dysplasia and PF osteoarthritis, and higher sulcus angle and patellar lateralization (hazard ratios = 5.1 to 11.6, p = 0.009 to 0.04).

Conclusion

When preserving the native patella, surgeons should be aware of pre-operative PF radiographic parameters that could influence the outcome and survivorship of CAS TKA leading to SPR. Particularly, evidence of PF dysplasia, osteoarthritis and maltracking should be determined pre-operatively to resurface the patella at the time of TKA.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level II (prospective cohort study)

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Computer-assisted surgery Survivorship Secondary patellar resurfacing Predictive factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Jerôme CRETON for providing assistance in statistical analyses.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

FF, HO, AJ and JW declare that they have no conflict of interest. VP declares royalties perceived from Amplitude, Valence, France.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution and the French national research committees, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel MP, Parratte S, Budhiparama NC (2014) The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 7:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9212-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2011) Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee 18:137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schindler OS (2012) The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1227–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1985-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swan JD, Stoney JD, Lim K, Dowsey MM, Choong PF (2010) The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 80:223–233.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05242.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helmy N, Anglin C, Greidanus NV, Masri BA (2008) To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2775–2783.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0420-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson TC, Tatman PJ, Mehle S, Gioe TJ (2012) Revision surgery for patellofemoral problems: should we always resurface? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:211–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2036-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1376–1381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourne RB, Burnett RS (2004) The consequences of not resurfacing the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL (2007) A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:65–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Furnes O (2010) Does patella resurfacing really matter? Pain and function in 972 patients after primary total knee arthroplasty. An observational study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 81:99–107.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003587069 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK (2002) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:187–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, Fiddian N, Fitzpatrick R, Grant A, Gray A, Johnston L, Maclennan G, Morris R, Murray D, KAT Trial Group (2011) Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1473–1481.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00725 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS (1994) Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:930–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, Sedel L (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E (2011) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1301–1309.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00594 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts DW, Hayes TD, Tate CT, Lesko JP (2015) Selective patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Arthroplast 30:216–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia RM, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM (2010) Isolated resurfacing of the previously unresurfaced patella total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25:754–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leta TH, Lygre SH, Skredderstuen A, Hallan G, Gjersten JE, Rokne B, Furnes O (2016) Secondary patella resurfacing in painful non-resurfaced total knee arthroplasties. A study of survival and clinical outcome from the Norwegian Arthroplasty register (1994-2011). Int Orthop 40:715–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3017-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munoz-Mahamud E, Popescu D, Nunez E, Lozano LM, Nunez M, Sastre S, Torner P, Segur JM, Macule F (2011) Secondary patellar resurfacing in the treatment of patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1467–1472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1402-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parvizi J, Mortazavi J, Devulapalli C, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH (2012) Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty. Does the anterior knee pain resolve? J Arthroplast 27:21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spencer SJ, Young D, Blyth MJ (2010) Secondary resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 17:187–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toro-Ibarguen AN, Navarro-Arribas R, Pretell-Mazzini J, Prada-Canizares AC, Jara-Sanchez F (2016) Secondary patellar resurfacing as a rescue procedure for persistent anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: do our patients really improve? J Arthroplast 31:1539–1543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhattee G, Moonot P, Govindaswamy R, Pope A, Fiddian N, Harvey A (2014) Does malrotation of components correlate with patient dissatisfaction following secondary patellar resurfacing? Knee 21:247–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ouanezar H, Franck F, Jacquel A, Pibarot V, Wegrzyn J (2016) Does computer-assisted surgery influence survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis? A 10-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3448–3456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4112-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Piriou P, Peronne E, Ouanezar H (2013) Rotational alignment of the femoral component using trochlear navigation during total knee arthroplasty: a dual-center study of 145 cases. J Arthroplast 28:1107–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saffarini M (2014) Evidence of trochlear dysplasia in femoral component designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2599–2607.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2268-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Gomez-Cardero P (2010) The Outerbridge classification predicts the need for patellar resurfacing in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1254–1257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1123-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chatain F, Gaillard TH, Denjean S, Tayot O (2013) Outcomes of 447 SCORE® highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties after 5-10 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:681–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.05.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML (2017) What clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters are associated with patellofemoral instability after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop 41:283–291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3287-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Assi C, Kheir N, Samaha C, Deeb M, Yammine K (2017) Optimizing patellar positioning during total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical and clinical study. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3557-4
  31. 31.
    Baldini A, Anderson JA, Zampetti P, Pavlov H, Sulco TP (2006) A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:150–154.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238847.34047.90 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59:241–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prudhon JL, Caton JH, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2017) How is patella height modified after total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3539-6
  35. 35.
    Wiberg G (1941) Roentgenographic and anatomic studies on the patellofemoral joint. Acta Orthop Scand 12:319–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iwano T, Kurosawa H, Tokuyama H, Hoshikawa Y (1990) Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. With special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiologic factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 252:190–197Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brattstroem H (1964) Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of the patella. Acta Orthop Scand 68:1–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grelsamer RP, Bazos AN, Proctor CS (1993) Radiographic analysis of patellar tilt. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:822–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ahmad R, Senthil Kumar G, Katam K, Dunlop D, Pozo JL (2009) Significance of a “hot patella” in total knee replacement without primary patellar resurfacing. Knee 16:337–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim BS, Reitman RD, Schai PA, Scott RD (1999) Selective patellar non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. 10 year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saffarini M, Demey G, Nover L, Dejour D (2016) Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 4:7.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.53 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florent Franck
    • 1
  • Hervé Ouanezar
    • 1
  • Alexandre Jacquel
    • 1
  • Vincent Pibarot
    • 1
  • Julien Wegrzyn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery—Pavillon THôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.INSERM UMR 1033, Université de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations