Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on soft tissue micro-circulation in the foot
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been shown to accelerate bone healing and is considered to increase blood flow. The aim of this study was to assess changes in micro-circulation of the foots’ soft tissue in response to LIPUS intervention. We hypothesised improved micro-circulation in response to LIPUS.
Micro-circulation was assessed in 2 mm and 8 mm-deep skin of 50 healthy volunteers using non-invasive laser-doppler spectrophotometry (O2C-device). Measurements were performed before LIPUS-intervention (pre), directly after intervention (post) and 20, 40 and 60 minutes after LIPUS.
All parameter of micro-circulation increased directly after LIPUS intervention at 8 mm depth. Participants with a low pre-intervention flow showed the largest changes (p < 0.001) with an increased post-flow of 38%. SO2 levels increased significantly after intervention (p = 0.045) and decreased after 60 minutes in comparison to pre-intervention status. rHb levels after 60 min were significantly higher in comparison to pre-intervention levels.
In healthy volunteers, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound led to significant short-term changes in microcirculation of the foot. Younger subjects with a low pre-flow level and smokers showed a higher potential to increase blood flow after LIPUS.
KeywordsLow-intensity pulsed ultrasound O2C Micro-circulation Blood flow Soft tissue Hindfoot
We would like to thank Daniel Timo Behrens for his consultation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics committee of the RWTH Aachen University Hospital, ethics approval EK 346/14.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with the ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
- 6.Rutten S, Nolte PA, Korstjens CM, van Duin MA, Klein-Nulend J (2008) Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases bone volume, osteoid thickness and mineral apposition rate in the area of fracture healing in patients with a delayed union of the osteotomized fibula. Bone 43(2):348–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Toyama Y, Sasaki K, Tachibana K, Ueno T, Kajimoto H, Yokoyama S, Ohtsuka M, Koiwaya H, Nakayoshi T, Mitsutake Y, Chibana H, Itaya N, Imaizumi T (2012) Ultrasound stimulation restores impaired neovascularization-related capacities of human circulating angiogenic cells. Cardiovasc Res 95(4):448–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rutten S, van den Bekerom MP, Sierevelt IN, Nolte PA (2016) Enhancement of bone-healing by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 29:4(3)Google Scholar
- 17.Poolman RW, Agoritsas T, Siemieniuk RA, Harris IA, Schipper IB, Mollon B, Smith M, Albin A, Nador S, Sasges W, Schandelmaier S, Lytvyn L, Kuijpers T, van Beers LW, Verhofstad MH, Vandvik PO (2017) Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for bone healing: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ 356:j576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Krug A (2006) CME: Mikrozirkulation und Sauerstoffversorgung des Gewebes-Methode des sogenannten O2C (oxygen to see). Phlebologie 6(277-336):300–312Google Scholar