International Orthopaedics

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1875–1880 | Cite as

Comparison of traditional surgery and surgery assisted by three dimensional printing technology in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures

Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare traditional surgery and surgery assisted by 3D printing technology in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. In addition, we also investigated the effect of 3D printing technology on the communication between doctors and patients.

Methods

Seventy two patients with tibial plateau fractures were enrolled in the study from April 2014 to October 2015. They were divided into two groups: 34 cases of 3D model group, 38 cases of traditional surgery group. The individual models were used to simulate the surgical procedures and carry out the surgery according to plan. Operation time, blood loss, and number of intra-operative fluoroscopy were recorded. Through the follow-up, the recovery of patients were observed. Besides, we designed questionnaires to verify the satisfaction for both surgeons and patients.

Results

The average operation time, average amount of blood loss, and number of intra-operative fluoroscopy for 3D model group was 85.2±0.9 minutes, 186.3± 5.5ml, 5.3± 0.2 times, and for traditional surgery group was 99.2±1.0 minutes, 216.2 ±6.9 ml,7.1 ± 0.2 times respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the traditional surgery group and 3D model group (P < 0.05). Via follow-up, we can see that the 3D printing group has a better clinical efficacy. The average score of the questionnaires to Patient and doctors were 7.3 ± 0.1 points and 8.5± 0.1 points respectively.

Conclusion

This study suggested the clinical feasibility of 3D printing technology in treatment of tibial plateau fractures.

Keywords

3D printing Questionnaire Surgery simulation Tibial plateau fracture 

References

  1. 1.
    Dirschl DR, Dawson PA (2004) Injury severity assessment in tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat R 423(423):85–92. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000132626.13539.4b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris BJ, Unger RZ, Archer KR, Mathis SL, Perdue AM, Obremskey WT (2013) Risk factors of infection after orif of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27(9):196–200. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318284704e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stannard JP, Lopez R, Volgas D (2010) Soft tissue injury of the knee after tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg 23(4):187–192. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1268694 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali AM, Elshafie M, Willett KM (2002) Failure of fixation of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16(5):323–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB, Benirschke SK (2004) Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique. J Orthop Trauma 18(10):649–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop J, Agel J, Dunbar R (2012) Predictive factors for knee stiffness after periarticular fracture: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(20):1833–1838. doi:10.2106/jaJS.K.00659 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang L, Shang XW, Fan JN et al (2016) Application of 3D printing in the surgical planning of trimalleolar fracture and doctor-patient communication. Biomed Res Int 2016(420):1–5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chung KJ, Huang B, Choi CH et al (2015) Utility of 3D printing for complex distal tibial fractures and malleolar avulsion fractures: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int 36(12):1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shuang F, Hu W, Shao Y et al (2016) Treatment of intercondylar humeral fractures with 3D-printed osteosynthesis plates. Medicine 95(3):e2461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bagaria V, Deshpande S, Rasalkar DD, Kuthe A, Paunipagar BK (2011) Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. Eur J Radiol 80(3):814–820. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Molenaars RJ et al (2016) Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: reliability and diagnostic accuracy. J Orthop Trauma 30(5):e144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W (2012) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1149–1154. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carrera I, Gelber P E, Chary G, et al. (2016) Fixation of a split fracture of the lateral tibial plateau with a locking screw plate instead of cannulated screws would allow early weight bearing: a computational exploration. Int Orthopaed: 1-–7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang L, Yu S, Lin CS et al (2016) The application of a three-column internal fixation system with anatomical locking plates on comminuted fractures of the tibial plateau. Int Orthop 40(7):1509–1514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehlinger M, Adamczewski B, Adam P, et al. (2015) Comparison of the pre-shaped anatomical locking plate of 3.5 mm versus 4.5 mm for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Int Orthopaed: 1–7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benum P, Aamodt AL (2010) Customised femoral stems in osteopetrosis and the development of a guiding system for the preparation of an intramedullary cavity: a report of two cases. Bone Joint J 92(9):1303–1305. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hahn DM (2004) Current principles of treatment in the clinical practice of articular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423(423):27–32. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000131234.91264.9e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu XB, Wang JQ, Zhao CP, Sun X, Shi Y, Zhang ZA et al (2015) Printed three-dimensional anatomic templates for virtual pre-operative planning before reconstruction of old pelvic injuries: initial results. Chin Med J 128(4):477–482. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.151088 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cockburn J, Walters WA (1999) Communication between doctors and patients. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 9(1):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dyche L (2007) Interpersonal skill in medicine: the essential partner of verbal communication. J Gen Intern Med 22(7):1035–1039. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0153-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A, Spiegel A, Romani D, Corain M et al (2016) 3d printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury 47(4):976–978. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsThe Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouChina

Personalised recommendations