Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 40, Issue 11, pp 2303–2307 | Cite as

Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome

  • Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla
  • Daniel Martinez-Mendez
  • Fernando A. Miralles-Muñoz
  • Luis Marco-Gomez
  • Fernando A. Lopez-Prats
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the time on waiting list for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the post-operative satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study of 192 patients followed for one year. Patients were pre and post-operatively assessed with the 12-item Short-Form, reduced Western Ontario MacMaster University, and Knee Society scores. In addition, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale was used at time of admission, and patient satisfaction on a five point Likert scale at one post-operative year. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

Patients waiting longer than six months had significantly worse pre-operative anxiety score as well as post-operative SF12 (both physical and mental) and KSS-function scores compared to those with a waiting time shorter than six months. Dissatisfaction rate was also higher in patients waiting longer than six months, and it was mainly influenced by pre-operative anxiety and depression.

Conclusions

Waiting time longer than six months negatively influenced post-operative satisfaction and patient-related outcome at one year after TKA. These findings may have important clinical implications regarding the prioritization of patients on wait lists or for optimization of treatment while patients wait for surgery related to the management of the mental health and anxiety in order to reduce post-operative dissatisfaction and improve patient-reported outcomes.

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty Waiting time Satisfaction Patient-reported outcome 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ (2012) Knee replacement. Lancet 379(9823):1331–1340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile E, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P (2009) Waiting for total knee replacement surgery: factors associated with pain, stiffness, function and quality of life. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-52 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ackerman IN, Bennell KL, Osborne RH (2011) Decline in health-related quality of life reported by more than half of those waiting for joint replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile E, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P (2010) The burden of wait for knee replacement surgery: effects on pain, function and health-related quality of life at the time of surgery. Rheumatology 49:945–954. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep469 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott CEH, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92:1253–1258. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ali A, Sundberg M, Robertsson O, Dahlberg LE, Thorstensson CA, Redlund-Johnell I, Kristiansson I, Lindstrand A (2014) Dissatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 85:229–233. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.916487 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ackerman IN, Graves SE, Wicks IP, Bennell KL, Osborne RH (2005) Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 53:653–658. doi: 10.1002/art.21439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile EL, Bourbonnais R, Frémont P (2012) The impacts of pre-surgery wait for total knee replacement on pain, function and health-related quality of life six months after surgery. J Eval Clin Pract 18:111–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01541.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly KD, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Newman SC, Suarez-Almazor ME (2001) Change in pain and function while waiting for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:351–359. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.21455 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kapstad H, Rustoen T, Hanestad BR, Moum T, Langeland N, Stavem K (2007) Changes in pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis waiting for hip or knee joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:837–843. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:963–974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vissers MM, de Groot IB, Reijman M, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA (2010) Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-121 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Axford J, Butt A, Heron C, Hammond J, Morgan J, Alavi A, Bolton J, Bland M (2010) Prevalence of anxiety and depression in osteoarthritis: use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool. Clin Rheumatol 29:1277–1283. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1547-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J (2007) Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed N (2009) Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:716–721. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Falez F (2014) Knee arthroplasty today. Int Orthop 38:221225. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2274-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Azkárate J, Güenaga JI, Arenaza JC, Gutierrez LF (2007) Effect of patient characteristics on reported outcomes after total knee replacement. Rheumatology 46:112–119. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bierke S, Häner M, Petersen W (2016) Influence of somatization and depressive symptoms on the course of pain within the first year after uncomplicated total knee replacement: a prospective study. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3105-z PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD (2007) Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:21–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM (2009) Knee arthroplasty: are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 80:55–61. doi: 10.1080/17453670902805007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel Martinez-Mendez
    • 1
  • Fernando A. Miralles-Muñoz
    • 1
  • Luis Marco-Gomez
    • 1
  • Fernando A. Lopez-Prats
    • 2
  1. 1.Orthopaedic SurgeryElda University HospitalEldaSpain
  2. 2.Traumatology and OrthopaediaMiguel Hernandez UniversityElcheSpain

Personalised recommendations