Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This paper aimed to compare the outcome of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for the tibia intramedullary nailing.

Methods

From February 2010 to August 2013, a total of 162 skeletally mature participants with tibia shaft fractures were identified and divided into suprapatellar approach group (SPAG) and infrapatellar approach group (IPAG) randomly. Fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss and complications were recorded. Visual analog score (VAS), Lysholm knee score and range of motion (ROM) were reviewed at one, three, six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. All patients were required to complete short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) at six, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

The follow–ups lasted two years at least. No significant differences were in major complication rate, operation time, blood loss, the ROM of injured extremity and length of hospital stay between SPAG and IPAG. Nevertheless, the fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in SPAG. VAS pain scores were lower in SPAG at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. A higher Lysholm knee score was observed in SPAG at six and 24 months post-operatively. Besides, a better overall physical components score was observed in SPAG except at six months post-operatively.

Conclusions

The suprapatellar approach was superior to infrapatrellar approach for the treatment of tibia shaft fracture. Therefore, we recommend the suprapatellar approach as a preferable approach in tibia intramedullary nailing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Larsen P, Lund H, Laessoe U, Graven-Nielsen T, Rasmussen S (2014) Restrictions in quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fracture: a retrospective follow-up study of 223 cases. J Orthop Trauma 28(9):507–512. doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000000031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Ehlin A, Al Dabbagh Z, Stark A, Jansson KA (2008) Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop 79(4):526–533. doi:10.1080/17453670710015535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691–697. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodrigues FL, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Valente AL, da Costa Pereira Cestari R, Pohl PH, Rodrigues LM (2014) Bone tissue repair in patients with open diaphyseal tibial fracture treated with biplanar external fixation or reamed locked intramedullary nailing. Injury 45(Suppl 5):S32–S35. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(14)70018-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Inan M, Halici M, Ayan I, Tuncel M, Karaoglu S (2007) Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus unreamed tibial nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(8):617–623. doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0332-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaftandziev I, Pejkova S, Saveski J (2006) Operative treatment of III grade open fractures of the tibial diaphysis. Prilozi / Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite, Oddelenie za bioloski i medicinski nauki = contributions / Macedonian academy of sciences and arts. Section Biol Med Sci 27(1):121–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhandari M, Zlowodzki M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schmidt A, Templeman DC (2005) Intramedullary nailing following external fixation in femoral and tibial shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19(2):140–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S (2014) Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma 28(5):256–262. doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000000070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Chan H, Blachut PA (2008) Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22(8):525–529. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318180e646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Toivanen JA, Vaisto O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen MJ (2002) Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-a(4):580–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernigou P, Cohen D (2000) Proximal entry for intramedullary nailing of the tibia. The risk of unrecognised articular damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(1):33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaines RJ, Rockwood J, Garland J, Ellingson C, Demaio M (2013) Comparison of insertional trauma between suprapatellar and infrapatellar portals for tibial nailing. Orthopedics 36(9):e1155–e1158. doi:10.3928/01477447-20130821-17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC (2014) Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 28(Suppl 8):S29–S39. doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000452787.80923.ee

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD (2008) Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:91. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn S, Appelmann P, Pairon P, Mehler D, Rommens PM (2014) The retrograde tibial nail: presentation and biomechanical evaluation of a new concept in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Injury 45(Suppl 1):S81–S86. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan DS, Serrano R, Griffing R, Steverson B, Infante A, Watson D, Sagi HC, Sanders RW (2015) Supra- versus Infra-patellar tibial nail insertion: a prospective, randomized control pilot study. J Orthop Trauma. doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000000499

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leliveld MS, Verhofstad MH (2012) Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing? Injury 43(6):779–783. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Straub RK, Cipriani DJ (2012) Influence of infrapatellar and suprapatellar straps on quadriceps muscle activity and onset timing during the body-weight squat. J Strength Conditioning Res Nat Strength Conditioning Assoc 26(7):1827–1837. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e81d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gelbke MK, Coombs D, Powell S, DiPasquale TG (2010) Suprapatellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia: a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces. J Orthop Trauma 24(11):665–671. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f6c001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders RW, Dipasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC (2014) Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 28(5):245–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Courtney PM, Boniello A, Donegan D, Ahn J, Mehta S (2015) Functional knee outcomes in infrapatellar and suprapatellar tibial nailing: does approach matter? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ) 44(12):E513–E516

    Google Scholar 

  22. Song SY, Chang HG, Byun JC, Kim TY (2012) Anterior knee pain after tibial intramedullary nailing using a medial paratendinous approach. J Orthop Trauma 26(3):172–177. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182217fe6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aksahin E, Yilmaz S, Karasoy I, Duran S, Yuksel HY, Dogan O, Yildirim AO, Bicimoglu A (2015) Sagittal patellar tilt and concomitant quadriceps hypotrophy after tibial nailing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy Off J ESSKA. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3533-8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rothberg DL, Holt DC, Horwitz DS, Kubiak EN (2013) Tibial nailing with the knee semi-extended: review of techniques and indications: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(16):e116. doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.01223, 111-118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moghaddam-Alvandi A, Zimmermann G, Hammer K, Bruckner T, Grutzner PA, von Recum J (2013) Cigarette smoking influences the clinical and occupational outcome of patients with tibial shaft fractures. Injury 44(11):1670–1671. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Q., Nie, X., Gong, J. et al. The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2611–2617 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3187-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3187-2

Keywords

Navigation