Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 1075–1081 | Cite as

Prediction of posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar fractures using non-MRI imaging techniques

  • Shanmuganathan RajasekaranEmail author
  • Anupama Maheswaran
  • Siddharth N. Aiyer
  • Rishi Kanna
  • Srikanth Reddy Dumpa
  • Ajoy Prasad Shetty
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to formulate a radiological index based on plain radiographs and computer tomography (CT) to reliably detect posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury without need for MRI.

Methods

Sixty out of 148 consecutive thoracolumbar fractures with doubtful PLC were assessed with MRI, CT and radiographs. PLC injury was assessed with the following radiological parameters: superior-inferior end plate angle (SIEA), vertebral body height (BH), local kyphosis (LK), inter-spinous distance (ISD) and inter-pedicular distance (IPD) and correlated with MRI findings of PLC injury. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the predictive values for the parameters to identify PLC damage.

Results

MRI identified PLC injury in 25/60 cases. The ISD and LK were found to be significant predictors of PLC injury. On radiographs the mean LK with PLC damage was 25.86° compared to 21.02° with an intact PLC (p = 0.006). The ISD difference was 6.70 mm in cases with PLC damage compared to 2.86 mm with an intact PLC (p = 0.011). In CT images, the mean LK with PLC damage was 22.96° compared to 18.44° with an intact PLC ( p = 0.019). The ISD difference was 3.10 mm with PLC damage compared to 1.62 mm without PLC damage (p = 0.005).

Conclusions

On plain radiographs the presence of LK greater than 20 °(CI 64–95) and ISD difference greater than 2 mm (CI 70–97) can predict PLC injury. These guidelines may be utilised in the emergency room especially when the associated cost, availability and time delay in performing MRI are a concern.

Keywords

Posterior ligamentous complex Thoracolumbar fractures Interspinous distance Local kyphosis Spinal deformity 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

Ganga Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation, Coimbatore.

Conflict of interest

None

Disclosures

None

Ethical considerations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hwee Weng Dennis H, Hwan Tak H (2011) A review of thoracolumbar spine fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 1:235406Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sethi MK, Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, Harris MB (2009) The evolution of thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine J 9(9):780–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 67(3):221–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hiyama A, Watanabe M, Katoh H, Sato M, Nagai T, Mochida J (2015) Relationships between posterior ligamentous complex injury and radiographic parameters in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures. Injury 46(2):392–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kepler CK, Felte RF, Rihn JA (2012) Current Concepts: Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures. Seminars Spine Surg 24(4):210–215, WB SaundersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith HE, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Ratliff JK (2010) Anatomy, biomechanics, and classification of thoracolumbar injuries. Seminars Spine Surg 22(1):2–7, WB SaundersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Hurlbert RJ, Lehman RA Jr, Harrop J, Fisher DC, Group STS et al (2006) Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study Group. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(1):1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R et al (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30(20):2325–2333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reinhold M, Audigé L, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Dai LY, Oner FC (2013) AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 22(10):2184–2201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C et al (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 38(23):2028–2037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crosby CG, Even JL, Song Y, Block JJ, Devin CJ (2011) Diagnostic abilities of magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic injury to the posterior ligamentous complex: the effect of years in training. Spine J 11(8):747–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Schweitzer KM, Lim MR, Baron EM, Rampersaud R et al (2007) Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiography. Spine J 7(4):422–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morais DF, de Melo Neto JS, Meguins LC, Mussi SE, Ferraz Filho L JR, Tognola WA (2014) Clinical applicability of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal cord trauma. Eur Spine J 23(7):1457–1463Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vaccaro AR, Lee JY, Schweitzer KM, Lim MR, Baron EM, Öner FC et al (2006) Assessment of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in thoracolumbar spine trauma. Spine J 6(5):524–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salgado Á, Pizones J, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Álvarez P, Zúñiga L, Izquierdo E (2013) MRI reliability in classifying thoracolumbar fractures according to AO classification. Orthopedics 36(1):e75–e78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wurmb TE, Frühwald P, Hopfner W, Keil T, Kredel M, Brederlau J, Kuhnigk H (2009) Whole-body multislice computed tomography as the first line diagnostic tool in patients with multiple injuries: the focus on time. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 66(3):658–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown CV, Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI (2005) Spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine fractures: its time has come. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 58(5):890–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hessmann MH, Hofmann A, Kreitner K, Lott C, Rommens PM (2006) The benefit of multislice CT in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. Acta Chir Belg 106(5):500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C (1996) Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 21(4):492–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jansson KÅ, Blomqvist P, Svedmark P, Granath F, Buskens E, Larsson M, Adami J (2010) Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden: an analysis of 13,496 patients admitted to hospital. Eur J Epidemiol 25(6):431–437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rajasekaran S, Kanna RM, Shetty AP (2015) Management of thoracolumbar spine trauma: An overview. Indian J Orthop 49(1):72CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R, Audigé L, Kandziora F, Pizanis A, Bühren V (2010) Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery. Eur Spine J 19(10):1657–1676CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee HM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, Suk KS, Park JO, Kim NH (2000) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine 25(16):2079–2084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haba H, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Terae S, Abe S, Yoshikawa H et al (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 99(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rihn JA, Yang N, Fisher C, Saravanja D, Smith H, Morrison WB, Vaccaro AR (2010) Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12(4):391–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Middendorp JJ, Patel AA, Schuetz M, Joaquim AF (2013) The precision, accuracy and validity of detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a critical appraisal of the literature. Eur Spine J 22(3):461–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anupama Maheswaran
    • 1
  • Siddharth N. Aiyer
    • 1
  • Rishi Kanna
    • 1
  • Srikanth Reddy Dumpa
    • 1
  • Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Spine SurgeryGanga HospitalCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations