Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 40, Issue 10, pp 2181–2190 | Cite as

Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: is there a consensus on treatment in Germany?

  • Tatjana Pastor
  • Gertraud Gradl
  • Kajetan Klos
  • Bergita Ganse
  • Klemens Horst
  • Hagen Andruszkow
  • Frank Hildebrand
  • Hans-Christoph Pape
  • Matthias Knobe
Original Paper

Abstract

Introduction

Open reduction in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures entails a high rate of wound healing deficits and infections as well as an uncertain outcome, which leads to remaining ambiguity in treatment preferences.

Methods

Between January and July 2011, we emailed 575 German chairpersons of trauma and/or orthopaedic departments, asking them to complete a 31–question web-based survey regarding three broad domains: fracture classification, surgical treatment algorithms and risk factors for wound healing deficits.

Results

The response rate was 47 %. With an incidence of 77 %, open reduction via an extended lateral approach and plate fixation was the main treatment option for displaced intra-articular fractures of the joint-depression-type (Sanders II or III). Percutaneous techniques were only preferred in individual cases, with mainly precarious wound situations (59 %) as well as in patients with a reduced general health condition (ASA 3 and 4; 41 %). The re-operation rate due to infections and wound healing deficits after an extended lateral approach was reported with a percentage of 0-5 % by 88 % of the respondents. Participants stated that especially a poor microcirculation of the foot, disregard of soft tissue conserving techniques, overall condition of the patient, smoking, long time-to-surgery and operation time are the main reasons for wound healing deficits.

Conclusion

Given the extended lateral approach as the preferred treatment option, we found minimally invasive techniques and primary arthrodesis of the lower ankle joint play a minor role in treating intra-articular calcaneal fractures in Germany. Ninety percent of our respondents stated less than 5 % of patients required re-operations due to infections and wound healing deficits.

Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.

Keywords

Extended lateral approach Fracture classification Intra-articular calcaneal fracture Minimally invasive techniques Treatment methods Wound healing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Michael Pastor for his creative and constructive ideas and especially Torsten Mueller for his support. The authors would also like to thank all the participants of this study. Without all of them this work would not have been possible.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

Informed consent

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Supplementary material

264_2016_3134_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bohler L (1931) Diagnosis, pathology, and treatment of fractures of the os calcis. J Bone Joit Surg 75–89Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Essex-Lopresti P (1993) The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis, 1951–52. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:3–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A (1993) Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:87–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Barthel S (2004) Calcaneal fractures--open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Injury 35(Suppl 2):SB46–SB54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rammelt S, Zwipp H (2004) Calcaneus fractures: facts, controversies and recent developments. Injury 35(5):443–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stulik J, Stehlik J, Rysavy M, Wozniak A (2006) Minimally-invasive treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88(12):1634–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tornetta P 3rd (2000) Percutaneous treatment of calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giachino AA, Uhthoff HK (1989) Intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(5):784–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jarvholm U, Korner L, Thoren O, Wiklund LM (1984) Fractures of the calcaneus. A comparison of open and closed treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 55(6):652–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruce J, Sutherland A (2013) Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD008628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen L, Zhang G, Hong J, Lu X, Yuan W (2011) Comparison of percutaneous screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement grafting versus open treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 32(10):979–985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schepers T, Vogels LM, Schipper IB, Patka P (2008) Percutaneous reduction and fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol 20(2):168–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Femino JE, Vaseenon T, Levin DA, Yian EH (2010) Modification of the sinus tarsi approach for open reduction and plate fixation of intra-articular calcaneus fractures: the limits of proximal extension based upon the vascular anatomy of the lateral calcaneal artery. Iowa Orthop J 30:161–167PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abdelazeem A, Khedr A, Abousayed M, Seifeldin A, Khaled S (2014) Management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the limited open sinus tarsi approach and fixation by screws only technique. Int Orthop 38(3):601–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Folk JW, Starr AJ, Early JS (1999) Early wound complications of operative treatment of calcaneus fractures: analysis of 190 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 13(5):369–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Court-Brown CM, Schmied M, Schmidt M, Schutte BG (2009) Factors affecting infection after calcaneal fracture fixation. Injury 40(12):1313–1315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Surgeons CoTotACo (2000) Resource for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient 1999. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knobe M, Gradl G, Ladenburger A, Tarkin IS, Pape H-C (2013) Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2831–2840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feinstein A (1987) The theory of evaluation of sensibility in clinimetrics. Yale University Press, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lawshe C (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 563–575Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang N, Lin Q-R, Diao X-C, Wu L, Yu B (2012) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture: a meta-analysis of current evidence base. Int Orthop 36(8):1615–1622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gougoulias N, Khanna A, McBride DJ, Maffulli N (2009) Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials. Br Med Bull 92:153–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Randle JA, Kreder HJ, Stephen D, Williams J, Jaglal S, Hu R (2000) Should calcaneal fractures be treated surgically? a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 377:217–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rubino R, Valderrabano V, Sutter PM, Regazzoni P (2009) Prognostic value of four classifications of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 30(3):229–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schepers T, van Lieshout MM, Ginai AZ, Mulder PGH, Heetveld MJ, Patka P (2009) Calcaneal fracture classification: a comparative study. J Foot Ankle Surg 48(2):156–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kinner BJ, Best R, Falk K, Thon K-P (2002) Is there a reliable outcome measurement for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures? J Trauma 53(6):1094–1101, discussion 1102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buckley R, Tough S, McCormack R, Pate G, Leighton R, Petrie D, Galpin R (2002) Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(10):1733–1744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thordarson DB, Krieger LE (1996) Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 17(1):2–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bakker B, Halm JA, Van Lieshout MM, Schepers T (2012) The fate of Bohler’s angle in conservatively-treated displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Int Orthop 36(12):2495–2499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jain V, Kumar R, Mandal DK (2007) Osteosynthesis for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15(2):144–148Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rak V, Bucek P, Ira D, Masek M (2006) Surgical treatment method of calcaneal intraarticular fractures. Rozhl Chir 85(6):311–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DeWall M, Henderson CE, McKinley TO, Phelps T, Dolan L, Marsh JL (2010) Percutaneous reduction and fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(8):466–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rammelt S, Amlang M, Barthel S, Zwipp H (2004) Minimally-invasive treatment of calcaneal fractures. Injury 35(Suppl 2):SB55–SB63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koski A, Kuokkanen H, Tukiainen E (2005) Postoperative wound complications after internal fixation of closed calcaneal fractures: a retrospective analysis of 126 consecutive patients with 148 fractures. Scand J Surg 94(3):243–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Backes M, Schepers T, Beerekamp MSH, Luitse JSK, Goslings JC, Schep NWL (2014) Wound infections following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures with an extended lateral approach. Int Orthop 38(4):767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatjana Pastor
    • 1
  • Gertraud Gradl
    • 1
  • Kajetan Klos
    • 2
  • Bergita Ganse
    • 1
  • Klemens Horst
    • 1
  • Hagen Andruszkow
    • 1
  • Frank Hildebrand
    • 1
  • Hans-Christoph Pape
    • 1
  • Matthias Knobe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic TraumaUniversity of Aachen Medical Center, RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic TraumaSt. Vincenz and Elisabeth Hospital MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations