International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 1785–1791 | Cite as

Predictors of treatment outcome in prosthetic joint infections treated with prosthesis retention

  • Ari-Pekka Puhto
  • Teija Puhto
  • Tuukka Niinimäki
  • Pasi Ohtonen
  • Juhana Leppilahti
  • Hannu Syrjälä
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The reported success rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) vary widely. Several risk factors have been described for treatment failure, but they vary between studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictors of DAIR failure in PJI treatment and to assess the efficacy of rifampin combined with ciprofloxacin versus rifampin combined with other antibiotics in staphylococcal PJIs.

Methods

Patients with PJI that underwent DAIR for the first time between February 2001 and August 2009 were identified retrospectively in the hospital’s patient databases. A total of 113 PJI cases with early postoperative or acute haematogenous PJI were followed for up to two years from the start of treatment.

Results

In univariate analysis, variables significantly associated with treatment failure were acute haematogenous infections (p = 0.022), leucocyte count at admission > 10 × 109/l (p < 0.01), pain in the joint (p < 0.01), and ineffective empirical antibiotics (p < 0.01). In a multivariate Cox model, leucocyte count > 10 × 109/l and ineffective empirical antibiotics were significant risk factors for failure. Compared to rifampin-ciprofloxacin, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment failure was significantly increased in the rifampin-other antibiotics group (HR 6.0, 95 % CI 1.5−28.8, p = 0.014) and the group treated without rifampin (HR 14.4, 95 % CI 3.1−66.9, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Rifampin-ciprofloxacin combination therapy was significantly more effective than rifampin combined with other antibiotics. Effective empirical antibiotics are essential for successful PJI treatment.

Keywords

Prosthetic joint infection Total knee arthroplasty Total hip arthroplasty Risk factors Outcome Rifampin 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bongartz T, Halligan CS, Osmon DR, Reinalda MS, Bamlet WR, Crowson CS, Hanssen AD, Matteson EL (2008) Incidence and risk factors of prosthetic joint infection after total hip or knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59:1713–1720. doi: 10.1002/art.24060 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill J, Parvizi J (2008) Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1710–1715. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phillips JE, Crane TP, Noy M, Elliott TSJ, Grimer RJ (2006) The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:943–948. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Puhto A-P, Puhto T, Syrjala H (2012) Short-course antibiotics for prosthetic joint infections treated with prosthesis retention. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:1143–1148. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03693.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:e1–e25. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis803 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351:1645–1654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040181 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marculescu C, Cantey JE (2008) Polymicrobial prosthetic joint infections: risk factors and outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1397–1404. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0230-7 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byren I, Bejon P, Atkins BL, Angus B, Masters S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Berendt A (2009) One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated with ‘DAIR’ (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:1264–1271. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp107 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuiper JWP, Vos SJ, Saouti R, Vergroesen DA, Graat HCA, Debets-Ossenkopp Y, Peters EJG, Nolte PA (2013) Prosthetic joint-associated infections treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention): analysis of risk factors and local antibiotic carriers in 91 patients. Acta Orthop 84:380–386. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.823589 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marculescu C, Berbari E, Hanssen A, Steckelberg J, Harmsen S, Mandrekar J, Osmon D (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471–478. doi: 10.1086/499234 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buller LT, Sabry FY, Easton RW, Klika AK, Barsoum WK (2012) The preoperative prediction of success following irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange for hip and knee prosthetic joint infections. J Arthroplasty 27:857–864.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, Soriano A, Sánchez-Somolinos M et al (2013) A large multicenter study of methicillin–susceptible and methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis 56:182–194. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Senneville E, Joulie D, Legout L, Valette M, Dezèque H et al (2011) Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in total hip/knee prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 53:334–340. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir402 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vilchez F, Martínez-Pastor JC, García-Ramiro S, Bori G, Maculé F, Sierra J, Font L, Mensa J, Soriano A (2011) Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:439–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03244.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blaser J, Vergères P, Widmer AF, Zimmerli W (1995) In vivo verification of in vitro model of antibiotic treatment of device-related infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:1134–1139. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.5.1134 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Widmer AF, Frei R, Rajacic Z, Zimmerli W (1990) Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections. J Infect Dis 162:96–102. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.1.96 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimmerli W, Frei R, Widmer AF, Rajacic Z (1994) Microbiological tests to predict treatment outcome in experimental device-related infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 33:959–967. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.5.959 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zimmerli W (2014) Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection. J Intern Med 276:111–119. doi: 10.1111/joim.12233 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M (2002) Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403:8–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Del Pozo JL, Patel R (2009) Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med 361:787–794. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0905029 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laffer RR, Graber P, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W (2006) Outcome of prosthetic knee-associated infection: Evaluation of 40 consecutive episodes at a single centre. Clin Microbiol Infect 12:433–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01378.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berdal J-E, Skråmm I, Mowinckel P, Gulbrandsen P, Bjørnholt JV (2005) Use of rifampicin and ciprofloxacin combination therapy after surgical debridement in the treatment of early manifestation prosthetic joint infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:843–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01230.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zimmerli W, Widmer AF, Blatter M, Frei R, Ochsner PE (1998) Role of rifampin for treatment of orthopedic implant-related staphylococcal infections: A randomized controlled trial. Foreign Body infection (FBI) study group. JAMA 279:1537–1541. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1537 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lora-Tamayo J, Parra-Ruiz J, Rodríguez-Pardo D, Barberán J, Ribera A, Tornero E, Pigrau C, Mensa J, Ariza J, Soriano A (2014) High doses of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d) plus rifampin for the treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection managed with implant retention: a comparative study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 80:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.05.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodríguez-Pardo D, Pigrau C, Lora-Tamayo J, Soriano A, del Toro MD et al (2014) Gram-negative prosthetic joint infection: outcome of a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention approach. A large multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:O911–O919. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12649 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choi H, von Knoch F, Kandil A, Zurakowski D, Moore S, Malchau H (2012) Retention treatment after periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infection. Int Orthop 36:723–729. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1324-5 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zürcher-Pfund L, Uçkay I, Legout L, Gamulin A, Vaudaux P, Peter R (2013) Pathogen-driven decision for implant retention in the management of infected total knee prostheses. Int Orthop 37:1471–1475. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1923-4 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Betz M, Abrassart S, Vaudaux P, Gjika E, Schindler M, Billières J, Zenelaj B, Suvà D, Peter R, Uçkay I (2015) Increased risk of joint failure in hip prostheses infected with staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention compared to streptococcus. Int Orthop 39:397–401. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2510-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ari-Pekka Puhto
    • 1
  • Teija Puhto
    • 2
  • Tuukka Niinimäki
    • 1
  • Pasi Ohtonen
    • 3
  • Juhana Leppilahti
    • 1
  • Hannu Syrjälä
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Operative Care, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryOulu University HospitalOuluFinland
  2. 2.Division of Operative Care, Department of Infection ControlOulu University HospitalOuluFinland
  3. 3.Division of Operative Care, Research and developmentOulu University HospitalOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations