Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 955–960 | Cite as

Olecranon tension plating or olecranon tension band wiring? A comparative biomechanical study

  • Dominik GruszkaEmail author
  • Charlotte Arand
  • Tobias Nowak
  • Sven-Oliver Dietz
  • Daniel Wagner
  • Pol Rommens
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The complication rate of a tension band wiring (TBW) used for the internal fixation of olecranon fractures remains high. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of a novel olecranon tension plate (OTP) with TBW in a simulated fracture model.

Methods

We tested 12 fresh frozen-pairs of cadaver proximal ulnae treated with OTP and TBW under cyclic loading. The elbow motion ranged from full extension to 90° of flexion, and the pulling force of the triceps tendon ranged from 50 to 350 N. The displacement of the fracture fragments was measured continuously. Data were assessed statistically using the Wilcoxon test with significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

The cyclic loading tests showed median displacements of the fracture fragments of 0.25 mm using OTP and 1.12 mm for TBW. Statistical analysis showed the difference to be substantial (p = 0.086) but not statistically significant. No plate breakage or screw loosening occurred.

Conclusions

The concept of replacing prominent K-wires at the proximal end of the ulna using an low-profile plate with classical lag and multidirectional angle-stable screws demonstrated biomechanical advantages over TBW.

Keywords

Tension band wiring Olecranon fracture Olecranon tension plate Biomechanical study Olecranon fixation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this study by any of the authors.

The biomechanical laboratory of the Department of Trauma Surgery is supported by a yearly grants from Medartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.

References

  1. 1.
    Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Karlsson C et al (2002) Fractures of the olecranon: a 15- to 25-year followup of 73 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403:205–212. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000022181.66847.50 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veillette CJH, Steinmann SP (2008) Olecranon fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 39:229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.01.002, viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rommens PM, Küchle R, Schneider RU, Reuter M (2004) Olecranon fractures in adults: factors influencing outcome. Injury 35:1149–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman SDS, Mauffrey C, Krikler S (2009) Olecranon fractures. Injury 40:575–581. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiegand L, Bernstein J, Ahn J (2012) Fractures in brief: olecranon fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3637–3641. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2393-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards SG, Cohen MS, Lattanza LL et al (2012) Surgeon perceptions and patient outcomes regarding proximal ulna fixation: a multicenter experience. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1637-1643. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mullett JH, Shannon F, Noel J et al (2000) K-wire position in tension band wiring of the olecranon—a comparison of two techniques. Injury 31:427–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider MM, Nowak TE, Bastian L et al (2014) Tension band wiring in olecranon fractures: the myth of technical simplicity and osteosynthetical perfection. Int Orthop 38:847–855. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2208-7 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catalano LW, Crivello K, Lafer MP et al (2011) Potential dangers of tension band wiring of olecranon fractures: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am 36:1659–1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Candal-Couto JJ, Williams JR, Sanderson PL (2005) Impaired forearm rotation after tension-band-wiring fixation of olecranon fractures: evaluation of the transcortical K-wire technique. J Orthop Trauma 19:480–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Todisco M, Trisi P (2005) Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:898–904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Labitzke R (1975) The lateral tension band. Demonstrated for fractures of the olecranon (author’s transl). Arch Orthop Unfallchir 81:193–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nowak TE, Burkhart KJ, Andres T et al (2013) Locking-plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for fixation of olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 37:899–903. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1854-0 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nowak TE, Burkhart KJ, Mueller LP et al (2010) New intramedullary locking nail for olecranon fracture fixation—an in vitro biomechanical comparison with tension band wiring. J Trauma 69:E56–E61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9af9b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hutchinson DT, Horwitz DS, Ha G et al (2003) Cyclic loading of olecranon fracture fixation constructs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:831–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brink PRG, Windolf M, de Boer P et al (2012) Tension band wiring of the olecranon: is it really a dynamic principle of osteosynthesis? Injury. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.052 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson J, Bajwa A, Kamath V, Rangan A (2011) Biomechanical comparison of interfragmentary compression in transverse fractures of the olecranon. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93:245–250. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.24613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bailey CS, MacDermid J, Patterson SD, King GJ (2001) Outcome of plate fixation of olecranon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:542–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hume MC, Wiss DA (1992) Olecranon fractures. A clinical and radiographic comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:229–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kozin SH, Berglund LJ, Cooney WP et al (1996) Biomechanical analysis of tension band fixation for olecranon fracture treatment. J Shoulder Elb Surg 5:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen X, Liu P, Zhu X et al (2013) Design and application of nickel-titanium olecranon memory connector in treatment of olecranon fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 37:1099–1105. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1878-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buijze GA, Blankevoort L, Tuijthof GJM et al (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures: one-third tubular versus locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:459–464. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0980-z CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prayson MJ, Williams JL, Marshall MP et al (1997) Biomechanical comparison of fixation methods in transverse olecranon fractures: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 11:565–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Snoddy MC, Lang MF, An TJ et al (2014) Olecranon fractures: factors influencing re-operation. Int Orthop 38:1711–1716. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duckworth AD, Clement ND, Aitken SA et al (2012) The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal ulna. Injury 43:343–346. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Gruszka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charlotte Arand
    • 1
  • Tobias Nowak
    • 1
  • Sven-Oliver Dietz
    • 1
  • Daniel Wagner
    • 1
  • Pol Rommens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyUniversity Medical CenterMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations