International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 715–720 | Cite as

Consensus for physiotherapy for shoulder pain

  • Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg
  • Ann M. J. Cools
  • Theresa M. Holmgren
  • Ann-Christine Gunnarsson Holzhausen
  • Kajsa Johansson
  • Annelies G. Maenhout
  • Jane S. Moser
  • Valentina Spunton
  • Karen Ginn
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Shoulder pain is a common disorder. Despite growing evidence of the importance of physiotherapy, in particular active exercise therapy, little data is available to guide treatment. The aim of this project was to contribute to the development of an internationally accepted assessment and treatment algorithm for patients with shoulder pain.

Methods

Nine physiotherapists with expertise in the treatment of shoulder dysfunction met in Sweden 2012 to begin the process of developing a treatment algorithm. A questionnaire was completed prior to the meeting to guide discussions. Virtual conferences were thereafter the platform to reach consensus.

Results

Consensus was achieved on a clinical reasoning algorithm to guide the assessment and treatment for patients presenting with local shoulder pain, without significant passive range of motion deficits and no symptoms or signs of instability. The algorithm emphasises that physiotherapy treatment decisions should be based on physical assessment findings and not structural pathology, that active exercises should be the primary treatment approach, and that regular re-assessment is performed to ensure that all clinical features contributing to the presenting shoulder pain are addressed. Consensus was also achieved on a set of guiding principles for implementing exercise therapy for shoulder pain, namely, a limited number of exercises, performed with appropriate scapulo-humeral coordination and humeral head alignment, in a graduated manner without provoking the presenting shoulder pain.

Conclusion

The assessment and treatment algorithm presented could contribute to a more formal, extensive process aimed at achieving international agreement on an algorithm to guide physiotherapy treatment for shoulder pain.

Keywords

Shoulder pain Physiotherapy Exercise therapy Treatment algorithm Clinical reasoning 

References

  1. 1.
    Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ et al (2004) Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 33:73–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K et al (2006) Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergman S, Herrström P, Högström K et al (2001) Chronic musculoskeletal pain, prevalence rates, and sociodemographic associations in a Swedish population study. J Rheumatol 28:1369–1377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bamji AN, Erhardt CC, Price TR, Williams PL (1996) The painful shoulder: can consultants agree? Br J Rheumatol 35:1172–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Winter AF, Jans MP, Scholten RJ et al (1999) Diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders: interobserver agreement and determinants of disagreement. Ann Rheum Dis 58:272–277CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liesdek C, Van Der Windt DAWM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1997) Soft-tissue disorders of the shoulder. A study of inter-observer agreement between general practitioners and physiotherapists and an overview of physiotherapeutic treatment. Physiotherapy 83:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Thomas S, Koes BW (2008) Lack of uniformity in diagnostic labeling of shoulder pain: time for a different approach. Man Ther 13:478–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN (2004) Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 17:152–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM (1995) Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 54:959–964CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebremariam L, Hay EM, van der Sande R et al (2014) Subacromial impingement syndrome–effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy. Br J Sports Med 48:1202–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G et al (1999) Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:102–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brox JI, Staff PH, Ljunggren AE, Brevik JI (1993) Arthroscopic surgery compared with supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome). BMJ 307:899–903CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Rousi T et al (2013) No evidence of long-term benefits of arthroscopicacromioplasty in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2:132–139CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kukkonen J, Joukainen A, Lehtinen J et al (2014) Treatment of non-traumatic rotator cuff tears: A randomised controlled trial with one-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 96-B:75–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J et al (2005) Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 64:760–764CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holmgren T, Bjornsson Hallgren H, Oberg B et al (2012) Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ 344:e787CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dickens VA, Williams JL, Bhamra MS (2005) Role of physiotherapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective study. Physiotherapy 91:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Itoi E (2013) Rotator cuff tear: physical examination and conservative treatment. J Orthop Sci 18:197–204CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R et al (2013) Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1371–1379CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ginn KA, Herbert RD, Khouw W, Lee R (1997) A randomized, controlled clinical trial of a treatment for shoulder pain. Phys Ther 77:802–809, discussion 810–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhn JE (2009) Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:138–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A et al (1995) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:10–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milgrom C, Schaffler M, Gilbert S, van Holsbeeck M (1995) Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77:296–298Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Girish G, Lobo LG, Jacobson JA et al (2011) Ultrasound of the shoulder: asymptomatic findings in men. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W713–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Group MS, Unruh KP, Kuhn JE et al (2014) The duration of symptoms does not correlate with rotator cuff tear severity or other patient-related features: a cross-sectional study of patients with atraumatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1052–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krief OP, Huguet D (2006) Shoulder pain and disability: comparison with MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1234–1239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE et al (2002) Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1996–2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Escolar-Reina P, Medina-Mirapeix F, Gascon-Canovas JJ et al (2010) How do care-provider and home exercise program characteristics affect patient adherence in chronic neck and back pain: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 10:60CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabin A, Irrgang JJ, Fitzgerald GK, Eubanks A (2006) The intertester reliability of the scapular assistance test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:653–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tate AR, McClure PW, Kareha S, Irwin D (2008) Effect of the scapula reposition test on shoulder impingement symptoms and elevation strength in overhead athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38:4–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Dome D (2006) Evaluation of apparent and absolute supraspinatus strength in patients with shoulder injury using the scapular retraction test. Am J Sports Med 34:1643–1647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis JS (2009) Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med 43:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg
    • 1
    • 7
  • Ann M. J. Cools
    • 2
  • Theresa M. Holmgren
    • 3
  • Ann-Christine Gunnarsson Holzhausen
    • 1
  • Kajsa Johansson
    • 3
  • Annelies G. Maenhout
    • 2
  • Jane S. Moser
    • 4
  • Valentina Spunton
    • 5
  • Karen Ginn
    • 6
  1. 1.Institution Neuroscience and Physiology/PhysiotherapyUniversity of Gothenburg and Physiotherapy Department Sahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  3. 3.Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  4. 4.Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesOxford University Hospitals TrustOxfordUK
  5. 5.University of GenoaGenoaItaly
  6. 6.Discipline of Biomedical Science, School of Medical Sciences, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  7. 7.Department of PhysiotherapySahlgrenska University Hospital/MölndalMölndalSweden

Personalised recommendations