Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain
- 621 Downloads
Recently, concerns have arisen about metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional cohort study was to describe the incidence of pain, pseudotumours, revisions and the relation between elevated metal ion levels, functional outcome and quality of life after MoM THA.
In 351 patients, 377 MoM THA with a fixed-size 38-mm head were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 11–58). Evaluation included pain, serum metal ions, patient-reported questionnaires (Short Form-36 [SF-36], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and the Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) and radiological imaging. Sixteen patients did not participate in the screening.
One hundred and eighteen (35 %) patients reported pain and showed significantly higher cobalt and chromium levels compared to patients without pain. Median serum cobalt levels were 4.4 μg/l (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6) and chromium levels were 3.6 μg/l (IQR 4.8). Patients with cobalt levels of ≤5 μg/l reported significantly better outcome on the SF-36 and HOOS. Fifty-seven pseudotumours were identified in 227 THAs. A revision rate of 19 % was observed.
In conclusion, 35 % of the patients experienced pain after MoM THA. These patients showed significantly higher serum metal ion levels. The patient-reported questionnaires indicated significantly better outcome in patients with cobalt levels ≤5 μg/l.
KeywordsTotal hip arthroplasty Quality of life Cobalt Chromium Pseudotumours Revisions
We would like thank Ben Heggelman radiologist at the Meander Medical Centre.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 13.Keurentjes JC, Blane D, Bartley M, Keurentjes JJ, Fiocco M, Nelissen RG (2013) Socio-economic position has no effect on improvement in health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in total hip and knee replacement: a cohort study. PLoS One 3:e56785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ware JE Jr, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX (1999) The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): I. Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med Care 5(Suppl):MS40–MS50Google Scholar
- 20.Lavigne M, Laffosse JM, Ganapathi M, Girard J, Vendittoli P (2011) Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:93–98. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01711 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10
- 24.van der Weegen W, Smolders JM, Sijbesma T, Hoekstra HJ, Brakel K, van Susante JL (2012) High incidence of pseudotumours after hip resurfacing even in low risk patients; results from an intensified MRI screening protocol. Hip Int:0. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000004
- 27.Australian Orthopaedic Association (2012) Hip and knee arthroplasty. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/annual-reports-2012
- 28.National Joint Registry for England, Wales and North Ireland (2014). Available at: www.njrcentre.org.uk