Full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: correlation of findings by arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging
- 288 Downloads
The main aim of this study was to correlate measurements of the width and retraction of isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with measurements recorded by arthroscopy using a continuous millimetre scale.
A total of 53 individuals with isolated supraspinatus tears and retraction < 30 mm underwent arthroscopy at our centre. Tear width and retraction measured by arthroscopy (reference standard) and MRI (index test) on a continuous millimetre scale were compared. All measurements were performed by a single radiologist blinded to intra-operative findings and one surgeon who had previous access to MRI results.
The average tear retraction was 12.60 ± 4.89 mm by arthroscopy and 16.81 ± 6.29 mm by MRI. Those measures exhibited moderate correlation (r = 0.643, p < 0.001) and an average difference of 4.21 mm (p < 0.001). Average tear width was 12.87 ± 4.15 mm by arthroscopy and 14.19 ± 5.20 by MRI. Those measures exhibited moderate correlation (r = 0.526, p < 0.001) and an average difference of 1.32 mm, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.109).
Measures of retraction and width obtained by MRI and arthroscopy exhibited moderate correlation in small- or medium-sized supraspinatus tears.
KeywordsRotator cuff tear MR imaging Arthroscopy Rotator cuff surgery Accuracy Lesion pattern
Conflict of interest
- 16.Singisetti K, Hinsche A (2011) Shoulder ultrasonography versus arthroscopy for the detection of rotator cuff tears: analysis of errors. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 19:76–79Google Scholar
- 17.Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K (2004) Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:708–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Van Dyck P, Gielen JL, Veryser J, Weyler J, Vanhoenacker FM, Van Glabbeek F, De Weerdt W et al (2009) Tears of the supraspinatus tendon: assessment with indirect magnetic resonance arthrography in 67 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Acta Radiol 50:1057–1063. doi: 10.3109/02841850903232723 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vlychou M, Dailiana Z, Fotiadou A, Papanagiotou M, Fezoulidis IV, Malizos KN (2009) Symptomatic partial rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging with surgical correlation. Acta Radiol 50:101–105. doi: 10.1080/02841850802600764 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD et al (2010) Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2623–2633. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00506 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston RV, Hanchard NC, Faloppa F (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:1–41. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2 Google Scholar
- 24.Hernigou P, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Delambre J, Zilber S, Duffiet P, Chevallier N, Rouard H (2014) Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cells during arthroscopy improves healing and prevents further tears: a case-controlled study. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2391-1 Google Scholar