Two-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: two to thirteen year experience using an articulating preformed spacer
Infection following knee replacement is an important cause of failure despite rigorous prophylaxis antibiotic protocols. The two-stage reimplantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep periprosthetic infections. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not a preformed articulated spacer would allow comparable eradication of infection equal to rates reported in published studies and to see whether there is a resulting improvement in postoperative function with an acceptable quality of life, reducing postoperative pain and limiting surgical complications, thus simplifying the second stage of the procedure.
We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients with infected TKA who underwent a two-stage exchange arthroplasty using an articulating preformed spacer. The device, designed like an ultracongruent condylar knee prosthesis, is composed of acrylic cement impregnated with antibiotic, with tested and standardised mechanical properties and antibiotic content and release mechanism.
The median follow-up period was seven (two to 13) years. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty was successful in controlling the infection in 92 % of patients; 64% of patients where women, and median patient age was 68 (54–80) years. Median implantation time of the preformed spacer was 16 (four to 60) weeks; 4 % of infections were delayed, and 96 % were late. Forty-six percent were caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS). Mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 35.38 (clinical) and 37.96 (function) on presentation; it improved to a mean of 72.92 (clinical) and 76.04 (function) after the first stage and to a mean of 75.38 (clinical) and 80.58 (function) at the final review. Bone loss was unchanged between stages, and range of motion remained unchanged or improved after definitive reimplantation.
The use of preformed articulated knee spacer during a two stage technique for infected TKA improves patient QOL between stages and increases patient compliance and cooperation, reducing social costs.
We thank the entire team in this study, especially C.Farina, A.Raglio and A. Grigis, Department of Microbiology; S. Buoro, Department of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory, G. Virotta, Department of Nuclear Medicine, G. Gregis, Departement of Infectious Diseases; Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXII Bergamo, Italy; A. Remuzzi, Engineering, Mario Negri Institute, Italy; G. Calonego, Tecres, Italy
Conflict of interest
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
- 1.Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S et al (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 286(94):1993Google Scholar
- 2.Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN et al (1997) Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long term of follow-up and functional outcome. JBJS Am 79:575Google Scholar
- 9.Cuckler JM, Star AM, Alavi A, Noto RB (1991) Diagnosis and management of the infected joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop North Am 22:523Google Scholar
- 11.Insall JN (1986) Infection of total knee arthroplasty. AAOS Instr Course Lect, St. Louis, CV Mosby, p 319Google Scholar
- 14.Johnson DP, Bannister GC (1986) The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. JBJS 68B:289–291Google Scholar
- 15.Romanò CL, Gala L, Logoluso N (2012) Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. KSSTA 2012:2445–2453Google Scholar
- 19.Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, Masri B et al (1992) The antibiotic loaded joint replacement system: a novel approach to the management of the infected knee replacement. JBJS Br 74(suppl III):296Google Scholar
- 20.Hofmann AA, Kane KR, Tkach TK, Plaster RL, Camargo MR (1995) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop 321(45–54):1995Google Scholar
- 23.Castelli C, Robotti PF, Calonego G. (2002) Preformed all-cement knee spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacement: mechanical and pharmacological behaviour. Proceedings of the SICOT XXII World Congress, Abstract P1415Google Scholar
- 28.Ferrari R, Goglio A, Grigis G, Raglio A, Buoro SG, Virotta A, Remuzzi Castelli C (2011) From swab to SEM: Our protocol on tka infection suspicion. Eur Cells and Mater 21(2):32, ISSN 1473–2262Google Scholar
- 30.Scott RD, Siliski JM (1985) The use of a modified V-Y quadricepsplasty during total knee replacement to gain exposure and improve flexion in the ankylosed knee. Orthopedics 8(45–48):1985Google Scholar
- 33.Dunne N, Hill J, McAfee P, Todd K, Kirkpatrick R, Tunney M, Patrick S (2007) In vitro study of the efficacy of acrylic bone cementloaded with supplementary amounts of gentamicinEffect on mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation. Acta Orthopaedica 78(6):774–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Castelli C, Martinelli R, Ferrari R (2001) The articulated knee spacer. In: Pipino F (ed) Bone cement and cemented fixation of implants. Finto Di Stampare Nel Mese, Italy, pp 181–191Google Scholar
- 39.Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP (1993) A temporary antibiotic-loaded joint replacement system for management of complex infections involving the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 24(751–9):1993Google Scholar
- 42.Durbhakula SM, Czajka J, Fuchs MD, Uhl RL (2004) Antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacer in the 2-stage exchange of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:768–774Google Scholar
- 46.Larikov D, Demian H, Rubin D, Alexander J, Nambiar S (2012) The choice and doses of antibacterial agents for cement spacers in treatment of prosthetic joint infections: review of published studies Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published August 23, 2012Google Scholar
- 48.Struelens B, Claes S, Bellemans J (2013) Spacer-related problems in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty Acta Orthop. Belg 79:422–426Google Scholar
- 54.Calton T, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (1994) Bone Loss Associated With the Useof Spacer Blocks in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:148–154Google Scholar
- 56.Castelli C, Ferrari R, Martinelli R. (2002) Preformed all-cement knee spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacement: early clinical results. Proceedings of the SICOT XXII World Congress, Abstract 327cGoogle Scholar
- 60.Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Lund B (2012) Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty.A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones. Int Orthop 36(9):1857–1863. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1601-y, Epub 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Springer BD, Lee GC, Osmon D, Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ (2004) Systemic safety of high-dose antibiotic-loaded cement spacers after resection of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:47–51Google Scholar
- 62.Meek RM, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, McGraw R, Greidanus NV, Masri BA (2004) Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty 19(7):874–879Google Scholar
- 63.Ghanem E, Kurd M, Pulido L, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2007) Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection. A Declining Success. European Bone and Joint Infection Society EBJIS. Corfu, Greece, September 20–22Google Scholar
- 64.Castelli C., Ferrari R. (2006) Preformed articulated all-cement spacer in two stage revision for infected knee replacement. Rationale and clinical result. J Bone Joint Surg Br vol. 88-B no. SUPP I 84Google Scholar