International Orthopaedics

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 405–412 | Cite as

Two-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: two to thirteen year experience using an articulating preformed spacer

  • Claudio Carlo Castelli
  • Valerio Gotti
  • Roberto Ferrari
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Infection following knee replacement is an important cause of failure despite rigorous prophylaxis antibiotic protocols. The two-stage reimplantation procedure is considered the gold standard for treatment of subacute and chronic deep periprosthetic infections. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not a preformed articulated spacer would allow comparable eradication of infection equal to rates reported in published studies and to see whether there is a resulting improvement in postoperative function with an acceptable quality of life, reducing postoperative pain and limiting surgical complications, thus simplifying the second stage of the procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients with infected TKA who underwent a two-stage exchange arthroplasty using an articulating preformed spacer. The device, designed like an ultracongruent condylar knee prosthesis, is composed of acrylic cement impregnated with antibiotic, with tested and standardised mechanical properties and antibiotic content and release mechanism.

Results

The median follow-up period was seven (two to 13) years. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty was successful in controlling the infection in 92 % of patients; 64% of patients where women, and median patient age was 68 (54–80) years. Median implantation time of the preformed spacer was 16 (four to 60) weeks; 4 % of infections were delayed, and 96 % were late. Forty-six percent were caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS). Mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 35.38 (clinical) and 37.96 (function) on presentation; it improved to a mean of 72.92 (clinical) and 76.04 (function) after the first stage and to a mean of 75.38 (clinical) and 80.58 (function) at the final review. Bone loss was unchanged between stages, and range of motion remained unchanged or improved after definitive reimplantation.

Conclusion

The use of preformed articulated knee spacer during a two stage technique for infected TKA improves patient QOL between stages and increases patient compliance and cooperation, reducing social costs.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank the entire team in this study, especially C.Farina, A.Raglio and A. Grigis, Department of Microbiology; S. Buoro, Department of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory, G. Virotta, Department of Nuclear Medicine, G. Gregis, Departement of Infectious Diseases; Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXII Bergamo, Italy; A. Remuzzi, Engineering, Mario Negri Institute, Italy; G. Calonego, Tecres, Italy

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S et al (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 286(94):1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN et al (1997) Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long term of follow-up and functional outcome. JBJS Am 79:575Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S et al (1997) Knee arthroplasty in reumatoid arthritis. A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 4381 primary operations 1985–1995. Acta Orthop Scand 68(6):545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gristina AG, Naylor P, Myrvik Q (1988) Infections from biomaterials and implants: a race for the surface. Med Prog Technol 14(3–4):205–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284(5418):1318–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Segawa H, Tsukayama DT, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustilo RB (1999) Infection after total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective study of the treatment of eighty-one infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1434–1445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM Insall Award paper (2002) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M (2001) Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:315–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuckler JM, Star AM, Alavi A, Noto RB (1991) Diagnosis and management of the infected joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop North Am 22:523Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rand JA (1993) Alternatives to reimplantation for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J Bone Joint Surg 75:282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Insall JN (1986) Infection of total knee arthroplasty. AAOS Instr Course Lect, St. Louis, CV Mosby, p 319Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borden LS, Gearen PF (1987) Infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goksan SB, Freeman MAR (1992) One stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson DP, Bannister GC (1986) The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. JBJS 68B:289–291Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romanò CL, Gala L, Logoluso N (2012) Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. KSSTA 2012:2445–2453Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masters JPM, Smith NA, Foguet P, Reed M, Parsons H, Sprowson PA (2013) A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013(14):222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Heinert K (1984) Antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: Current concepts. Clin Orthop 190:96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilde AH, Ruth JT (1988) Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 236:23–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP, Masri B et al (1992) The antibiotic loaded joint replacement system: a novel approach to the management of the infected knee replacement. JBJS Br 74(suppl III):296Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hofmann AA, Kane KR, Tkach TK, Plaster RL, Camargo MR (1995) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. Clin Orthop 321(45–54):1995Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calton TF, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (1997) Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:148–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haddad FA, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP Duncan CP (2000) The Prostalac functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacement. JBJS 82-B:807––812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Castelli C, Robotti PF, Calonego G. (2002) Preformed all-cement knee spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacement: mechanical and pharmacological behaviour. Proceedings of the SICOT XXII World Congress, Abstract P1415Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertazzoni Minelli E, Benini A, Magnan B, Bartolozzi P (2003) Release of gentamicin and vancomycin from temporary human hip spacers in two-stage revision of infected arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(2):329–334, Epub 2003 Dec 19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pitto RP, Castelli CC, Ferrari R, Munro J (2005) Pre-formed articulating knee spacer in two-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 29(5):305–308PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McPherson EJ, Lewonoswski K, Don LD (1995) Use of an articulated PMMA spacer in the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Arthroplasty 10(1):87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2004) Sinovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 117:556–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrari R, Goglio A, Grigis G, Raglio A, Buoro SG, Virotta A, Remuzzi Castelli C (2011) From swab to SEM: Our protocol on tka infection suspicion. Eur Cells and Mater 21(2):32, ISSN 1473–2262Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scott RD, Siliski JM (1985) The use of a modified V-Y quadricepsplasty during total knee replacement to gain exposure and improve flexion in the ankylosed knee. Orthopedics 8(45–48):1985Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Villa T, Carnelli D (2007) Experimental evaluation of the biomechanical performances of a PMMA-based knee spacer. Knee 14(2):145–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leone JM, Hanssen AD (2005) Management of Infection at the Site of a Total KneeArthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2335–2348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dunne N, Hill J, McAfee P, Todd K, Kirkpatrick R, Tunney M, Patrick S (2007) In vitro study of the efficacy of acrylic bone cementloaded with supplementary amounts of gentamicinEffect on mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation. Acta Orthopaedica 78(6):774–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Castelli C, Martinelli R, Ferrari R (2001) The articulated knee spacer. In: Pipino F (ed) Bone cement and cemented fixation of implants. Finto Di Stampare Nel Mese, Italy, pp 181–191Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mutimer J, Gillespie G, Lovering AM, Porteous AJ (2009) Measurements of in vivo intra-articular gentamicin levels from antibiotic loaded articulating spacers in revision total knee replacement. Knee 16(2009):39–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplastyIn the united states. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Borden LS, Gearen PF, Infected total knee arthroplasty (1987) A protocol for management. J Arthroplasty 1987(2):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Emerson RH Jr, Muncie M, Tarbox TR, Higgins LL (2002) (2002) Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:132–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duncan CP, Beauchamp CP (1993) A temporary antibiotic-loaded joint replacement system for management of complex infections involving the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 24(751–9):1993Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2010) Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 35(8):1157–1164. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1134-1, Epub 2010 Oct 21PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kubista B, Hartzler RU, Wood CM, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2012) Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36(1):65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1267-x, Epub 2011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Durbhakula SM, Czajka J, Fuchs MD, Uhl RL (2004) Antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacer in the 2-stage exchange of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:768–774Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hofmann AA, Goldberg T, Tanner AM, Kurtin SM (2005) Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer: 2- to 12-year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:125–1314, 1445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    MacAvoy MC, Ries MD (2005) The ball and socket articulating spacer for infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005(20):757–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Masters JPM, Smith NA, Foguet P, Reed M, Parsons H, Sprowson PA (2013) A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 14:222PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Larikov D, Demian H, Rubin D, Alexander J, Nambiar S (2012) The choice and doses of antibacterial agents for cement spacers in treatment of prosthetic joint infections: review of published studies Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published August 23, 2012Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Munro JT, Garbuz BDS, Masri A, Duncan CP (2012) Articulating antibiotic impregnated spacers in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B(Supple A):123–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Struelens B, Claes S, Bellemans J (2013) Spacer-related problems in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty Acta Orthop. Belg 79:422–426Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Garvin KL, Scuderi G, Insall JN (1995) Evolution of quadriceps snip. Clin Orthop 321:131–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Voleti PB, Baldwin KD, Lee GC (2013) Use of static or articulating spacers for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(17):1594–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1996) (1996) 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 331:118–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pitto RP, Spika I (2004) A Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers in twostage management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop (SICOT) 28:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB (2000) Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Calton T, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (1994) Bone Loss Associated With the Useof Spacer Blocks in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:148–154Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jafari SM, Casper DS, Camilo Restrepo BS, Zmistowski B, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF (2012) Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients With Multiple Prosthetic Joints at Risk? J Arthroplasty 27(6):877–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Castelli C, Ferrari R, Martinelli R. (2002) Preformed all-cement knee spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacement: early clinical results. Proceedings of the SICOT XXII World Congress, Abstract 327cGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Carulli C, Villano M, Civinini R, Matassi F, Nistri L, Innocenti M (2013) A novel technique to preserve range of motion in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(6):1069–1074. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1880-y, Epub 2013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Meijer MF, Reininga IH, Boerboom AL, Stevens M, Bulstra SK (2013) Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(3):415–419. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1739-7, Epub 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sternheim A, Lochab J, Drexler M, Kuzyk P, Safir O, Gross A, Backstein D (2012) The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement. Int Orthop 36(12):2473–2478. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1675-6, Epub 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Lund B (2012) Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty.A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones. Int Orthop 36(9):1857–1863. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1601-y, Epub 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Springer BD, Lee GC, Osmon D, Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ (2004) Systemic safety of high-dose antibiotic-loaded cement spacers after resection of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:47–51Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Meek RM, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, McGraw R, Greidanus NV, Masri BA (2004) Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty 19(7):874–879Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ghanem E, Kurd M, Pulido L, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2007) Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection. A Declining Success. European Bone and Joint Infection Society EBJIS. Corfu, Greece, September 20–22Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Castelli C., Ferrari R. (2006) Preformed articulated all-cement spacer in two stage revision for infected knee replacement. Rationale and clinical result. J Bone Joint Surg Br vol. 88-B no. SUPP I 84Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Carlo Castelli
    • 1
  • Valerio Gotti
    • 1
  • Roberto Ferrari
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Orthopedics and TraumatologyBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations