International Orthopaedics

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 149–154 | Cite as

Treatment of displaced talar neck fractures using delayed procedures of plate fixation through dual approaches

  • Youdi Xue
  • Hui Zhang
  • Fuxing Pei
  • Chongqi Tu
  • Yueming Song
  • Yue Fang
  • Lei Liu
Original Paper



Treatment of talar neck fractures is challenging. Various surgical approaches and fixation methods have been documented. Clinical outcomes are often dissatisfying due to inadequate reduction and fixation with high rates of complications. Obtaining satisfactory clinical outcomes with minimum complications remains a hard task for orthopaedic surgeons.


In the period from May 2007 to September 2010, a total of 31 cases with closed displaced talar neck fractures were treated surgically in our department. Injuries were classified according to the Hawkins classification modified by Canale and Kelly. Under general anaesthesia with sufficient muscle relaxation, urgent closed reduction was initiated once the patients were admitted; if the procedure failed, open reduction and provisional stabilisation with Kirschner wires through an anteromedial approach with tibiometatarsal external fixation were performed. When the soft tissue had recovered, definitive fixation was performed with plate and screws through dual approaches. The final follow-up examination included radiological analysis, clinical evaluation and functional outcomes which were carried out according to the Ankle-Hindfoot Scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), patient satisfaction and SF-36.


Twenty-eight patients were followed up for an average of 25 months (range 18–50 months) after the injury. Only two patients had soft tissue complications, and recovery was satisfactory with conservative treatment. All of the fractures healed anatomically without malunion and nonunion, and the average union time was 14 weeks (range 12–24 weeks). Post-traumatic arthritis developed in ten cases, while six patients suffered from avascular necrosis of the talus. Secondary procedures included three cases of subtalar arthrodesis, one case of ankle arthrodesis and one case of total ankle replacement. The mean AOFAS hindfoot score was 78 (range 65–91). According to the SF-36, the average score of the physical component summary was 68 (range 59–81), and the average score of the mental component summary was 74 (range 63–85).


Talar neck fractures are associated with a high incidence of long-term disability and complications. Urgent reduction of the fracture-dislocation and delayed plate fixation through a dual approach when the soft tissue has recovered may minimise the complications and provide good clinical outcomes.


Ankle Talar neck fracture Dual approaches Internal fixation 



Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Halvorson JJ, Winter SB, Teasdall RD, Scott AT (2013) Talar neck fractures: a systematic review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Surg 52:56–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    García-Rey E, Sanz-Hospital FJ, Galdrán FJ, Cano-Egea JM, Alcázar LFL (2002) Talar neck fractures: results and complications by type. Foot Ankle Surg 8:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hawkins LG (1970) Fractures of the neck of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(5):991–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cronier P, Talha A, Massin P (2004) Central talar fractures—therapeutic considerations. Injury 35(Suppl 2):SB10–SB22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sangeorzan BJ, Wagner UA, Harrington RM, Tencer AF (1992) Contact characteristics of the subtalar joint: the effect of talar neck misalignment. J Orthop Res 10(4):544–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canale ST, Kelly FB Jr (1978) Fractures of the neck of the talus. Long-term evaluation of seventy-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):143–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS et al (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fournier A, Barba N, Steiger V et al (2012) Total talar fracture—long-term results of internal fixation of talar fractures. A multicentric study of 114 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:S48–S55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adelaar RS (1997) Complex fractures of the talus. Instr Course Lect 46:323–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels TR, Smith JW (1993) Talar neck fractures. Foot Ankle 14(4):225–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peterson L, Goldie IF (1975) The arterial supply of the talus. A study on the relationship to experimental talar fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 46(6):1026–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gelberrnan RH, Mortensen WW (1983) The arterial anatomy of the talus. Foot Ankle 4(2):64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metzger MJ, Levin JS, Clancy JT (1999) Talar neck fractures and rates of avascular necrosis. J Foot Ankle Surg 38(2):154–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berlet GC, Lee TH, Massa EG (2001) Talar neck fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 32(1):53–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vallier HA, Nork SE, Barei DP, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ (2004) Talar neck fractures: results and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(8):1616–1624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Tile M, Stephen D, Kase J (2000) Fractures of the talus: experience of two level 1 trauma centers. Foot Ankle Int 21(12):1023–1029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kopp L, Obruba P, Riegl J, Meluzinová P, Edelmann K (2013) Surgical management of talus fractures: mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 80(2):165–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dickson KF, Montgomery S, Field J (2001) High energy plafond fractures treated by a spanning external fixator initially and followed by a second stage open reduction internal fixation of the articular surface—preliminary report. Injury 32:SD92–SD98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frawley PA, Hart JA, Young DA (1995) Treatment outcome of major fractures of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 16(6):339–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daniels TR, Smith JW, Ross TI (1996) Varus malalignment of the talar neck. Its effect on the position of the foot and on subtalar motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1559–1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Inokuchi S, Ogawa K, Usami N, Hashimoto T (1996) Long-term follow up of talus fractures. Orthopedics 19(5):477–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanders DW, Busam M, Hattwick E, Edwards JR, McAndrew MP, Johnson KD (2004) Functional outcomes following displaced talar neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18(5):265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herscovici D Jr, Anglen JO, Archdeacon M, Cannada L, Scaduto JM (2008) Avoiding complications in the treatment of pronation-external rotation ankle fractures, syndesmotic injuries, and talar neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(4):898–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohl X, Harisboure A, Hemery X, Dehoux E (2011) Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of talar fractures: twenty cases with an average follow-up of 7.5 years. Int Orthop 35:93–99PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fleuriau Chateau PB, Brokaw DS, Jelen BA, Scheid DK, Weber TG (2002) Plate fixation of talar neck fractures: preliminary review of a new technique in twenty-three patients. J Orthop Trauma 16(4):213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youdi Xue
    • 1
  • Hui Zhang
    • 1
  • Fuxing Pei
    • 1
  • Chongqi Tu
    • 1
  • Yueming Song
    • 1
  • Yue Fang
    • 1
  • Lei Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations