International Orthopaedics

, Volume 37, Issue 10, pp 1891–1895 | Cite as

The mini postero-postero-lateral mini incision in total hip arthroplasty

  • Frederic Jacquot
  • Mokrane Ait Mokhtar
  • Alain Sautet
  • Levon Doursounian
  • Alain-Charles Masquelet
  • Jean-Marc Feron
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Mini invasive incisions in THA and femoral hip prostheses tend to minimise healing and recovery time. We have used a very posterior approach with technical modifications and precise skin landmarks to decrease surgical complexity, and we describe this experience here.

Methods

From 2010 to 2012, 140 patients aged 79 years (range 53–93 years) were operated upon by the same surgeon in a continuous series using the same minimally invasive skin incision and six different types of implants. The incision was very posterior in the hip allowing direct visualisation of the acetabulum in the hip flexion position and visualisation of the femoral shaft extremity in a leg flexion position.

Results

The mean operating time was 100 minutes (range 75–110 min). Estimated blood loss was 385 cc (20–585 cc). Twenty-six patients had blood transfusion. The mean hospital stay was 6.8 days (5–20 days) including the time waiting for a rehabilitation centre. No operative complications related to the technique were recorded. On the postoperative radiograph, the femoral stem was aligned with the femoral axis within 3° in all patients. The mean acetabular angle to the ground plane was 40° (35–48°).

No patient had a leg length discrepancy of more than four millimetres. The mean skin incision length was seven centimetres (six to eight centimetres). All patients were seen at the clinic after six weeks and the data were unchanged at this time point.

Conclusion

The method and skin landmarks we describe appear to be a safe way to perform minimally invasive total hip replacement.

Keywords

Minimally invasive incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Posterior No complications 

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson A (1950) Posterior exposure of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B(2):183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore AT (1959) The Moore self-locking vitallium prothesis in fresh femoral neck fractures: a new low posterior approach (the southern exposure). AAOS Instr Course Lect 16:309Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charnley J, Ferreiraade S (1964) Transplantation of the greater trochanter in arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46:191–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amstutz HC (1973) Trapezoidal-28 total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 95:158–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(1):17–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B(2):166–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Procyk S (2007) Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S17–S20. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0435-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ (2004) Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):91–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bertin KC, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME (2006) Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(3):164–173. doi:10.1007/s00402-006-0113-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA, Gordon AC (2003) Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):33–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berger RA (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):143–151. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00111-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):153–162. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00137-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berger RA, Duwelius PJ (2004) The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):163–172. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00110-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swanson TV (2007) Posterior single-incision approach to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S1–S5. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0436-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1353–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE (2007) Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(6):1153–1160. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00940 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Zhu S, Glazener C, Fraser C, Munro N, Hutchison J, Grant A, Coyle D, Coyle K, Vale L (2008) A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modeling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess 12(26):iii–iv, ix–223Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hartzband MA (2004) Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):119–129. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00119-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shitama T, Kiyama T, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Huang G (2009) Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 33(6):1543–1547. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0708-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, Wakimoto N, Matsushita T (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28(4):214–217. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0570-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18(2):123–128. doi:10.1054/arth.2003.50025 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Floren M, Lester DK (2006) Durability of implant fixation after less-invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6):783–790. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O'Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(4):701–710. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02645 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):137–142. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swanson TV (2005) Early results of 1000 consecutive, posterior, single-incision minimally invasive surgery total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):26–32. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldstein WM, Branson JJ (2004) Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2):131–136. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00108-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levine BR, Klein GR, Di Cesare PE (2007) Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a review of the mini-incision and MIS literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65(1):5–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noble PC, Johnston JD, Alexander JA, Thompson MT, Usrey MM, Heinrich EM, Landon GC, Mathis KB (2007) Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S25–S28. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0432-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A (1999) Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14(2):159–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, Park EH, Lorenz HP (2005) Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ward SR, Jones RE, Long WT, Thomas DJ, Dorr LD (2008) Functional recovery of muscles after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 57:249–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Laffosse JM, Accadbled F, Molinier F, Chiron P, Hocine B, Puget J (2008) Anterolateral mini-invasive versus posterior mini-invasive approach for primary total hip replacement. Comparison of exposure and implant positioning. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(4):363–369. doi:10.1007/s00402-007-0385-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khan RJ, Fick D, Khoo P, Yao F, Nivbrant B, Wood D (2006) Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty 21(7):1038–1046. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim YS, Kwon SY, Sun DH, Han SK, Maloney WJ (2008) Modified posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty to enhance joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):294–299. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0056-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang Y, Tang Y, Zhang C, Zhao X, Xie Y, Xu S (2013) Modified posterior soft tissue repair for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37(6):1039–1044. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1874-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McGrory BJ, Finch ME, Furlong PJ, Ruterbories J (2008) Incision length correlates with patient weight, height, and gender when using a minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 17(2):77–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sculco TP, Boettner F (2006) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the posterior approach. Instr Course Lect 55:205–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dienstknecht T, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J, Sendtner E (2013) A minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty does not diminish early post-operative outcome in obese patients: a prospective, randomised trial. Int Orthop 37(6):1013–1018. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1833-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duwelius PJ, Dorr LD (2008) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: an overview of the results. Instr Course Lect 57:215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19(5):538–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederic Jacquot
    • 1
  • Mokrane Ait Mokhtar
    • 2
  • Alain Sautet
    • 1
  • Levon Doursounian
    • 1
  • Alain-Charles Masquelet
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Feron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsHôpital Saint Antoine ParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsCH Lagny Marne la ValléeParisFrance

Personalised recommendations