International Orthopaedics

, Volume 37, Issue 7, pp 1285–1290

Realignment-lengthening osteotomy for malunited distal fibular fracture

Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Persistent displacement of ankle fractures increases the stresses on the articular cartilage and leads to degenerative arthritis. Correction of the ankle mortise restores the normal ankle biomechanics and should prevent the development of degenerative joint disease.

Methods

Seventeen patients were treated for symptomatic ankle joint due to malunited distal fibular fracture. There were eleven male and six female patients. Their ages ranged from 23 to 54 years (median 34 years). The procedure included transverse fibular osteotomy for restoration of the lateral malleolar alignment, acute distraction of the osteotomy to restore the fibular length with interpositional graft and reduction of subluxation of the distal tibio-fibular articulation. Internal fixation of the osteotomy was performed with plate and screws and trans-syndesmotic screws.

Results

Fibular lengthening was performed in all cases and ranged from six to 12 mm (median eight millimetres). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score preoperatively ranged from 40 to 74 (median 60) and at follow up ranged from 50 to 95 (median 79). Progression of ankles arthrosis occurred in one patient leading to ankle arthrodesis as a secondary procedure. Results were satisfactory in 12 cases (70.6 %), and unsatisfactory in five cases (29.4 %) due to stiffness and pain in the ankle joint. The follow-up ranged from 24 to 45 months (median 31 months).

Conclusion

Corrective osteotomy of fibular malunion produces considerable improvement provided that the patient does not have significant degenerative changes before surgery. The use of athrodiastasis of the ankle as a secondary procedure may be of value to improve the outcome.

References

  1. 1.
    van Wensen RJ, van den Bekerom MP, Marti RK, van Heerwaarden RJ (2011) Reconstructive osteotomy of fibular malunion: review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 6(2):51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yablon IG, Heller FG, Shouse L (1977) The key role of the lateral malleolus in displaced fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(2):169–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke HJ, Michelson JD, Cox QG, Jinnah RH (1991) Tibio-talar stability in bimalleolar ankle fractures: a dynamic in vitro contact area study. Foot Ankle 11(4):222–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T (1980) Load-bearing pattern of the ankle joint. Contact area and pressure distribution. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96(1):45–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vrahas M, Fu F, Veenis B (1994) Intraarticular contact stresses with simulated ankle malunions. J Orthop Trauma 8(2):159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curtis MJ, Michelson JD, Urquhart MW, Byank RP, Jinnah RH (1992) Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. A cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scand 63(3):326–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S (1997) The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(12):1809–1815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stufkens SA, Barg A, Bolliger L, Stucinskas J, Knupp M, Hintermann B (2011) Measurement of the medial distal tibial angle. Foot Ankle Int 32(3):288–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weber BG, Simpson LA (1985) Corrective lengthening osteotomy of the fibula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 199:61–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ward AJ, Ackroyd CE, Baker AS (1990) Late lengthening of the fibula for malaligned ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(4):714–717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber D, Friederich NF, Müller W (1998) Lengthening osteotomy of the fibula for post-traumatic malunion. Indications, technique and results. Int Orthop 22(3):149–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reidsma II, Nolte PA, Marti RK, Raaymakers EL (2010) Treatment of malunited fractures of the ankle: a long-term follow-up of reconstructive surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):66–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Q, Whittle M, Cunningham J, Kenwright J (1996) Fibula and its ligaments in load transmission and ankle joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 330:261–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scranton PE Jr, McMaster JG, Kelly E (1976) Dynamic fibular function: a new concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:76–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marti RK, Raaymakers EL, Nolte PA (1990) Malunited ankle fractures. The late results of reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(4):709–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Offierski CM, Graham JD, Hall JH, Harris WR, Schatzker JL (1982) Late revision of fibular malunion in ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 171:145–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Intema F, Thomas TP, Anderson DD, Elkins JM, Brown TD, Amendola A, Lafeber FP, Saltzman CL (2011) Subchondral bone remodeling is related to clinical improvement after joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 19(6):668–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of TantaTantaEgypt

Personalised recommendations