Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 67–75 | Cite as

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty—outcome and follow-up

  • Reinhold Ortmaier
  • Herbert Resch
  • Nicholas Matis
  • Martina Blocher
  • Alexander Auffarth
  • Michael Mayer
  • Wolfgang Hitzl
  • Mark Tauber
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The number of shoulder arthroplasties has increased over the last decade, which can partly be explained by the increasing use of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty technique. However, the options for revision surgery after primary arthroplasty are limited in cases of irreparable rotator cuff deficiency, and tuberosity malunion, nonunion, or resorption. Often, conversion to a reverse design is the only suitable solution. We analysed the functional outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction after the revision of primary shoulder arthroplasty using an inverse design.

Methods

Over a ten-year period 57 patients underwent revision surgery for failed primary shoulder arthroplasty using a reverse design. Of the 57 patients, 50 (mean age, 64.2 years) were available after an average follow-up of 51 months. Clinical evaluation included the Constant Murley Score, the UCLA score, and the Simple Shoulder Test, whereas radiological evaluation included plain radiographs in standard projections. Patients were also requested to rate their subjective satisfaction of the final outcome as excellent, good, satisfied or dissatisfied.

Results

Compared to the preoperative status, the overall functional outcome measurements based on standardised outcome shoulder scores improved significantly at follow-up. The overall mean Constant Murley score improved from 18.5 to 49.3 points, the mean UCLA score improved from 7.1 to 21.6 points, and the mean simple shoulder test improved from 1.2 to 5.6 points. The average degree of abduction improved from 40 to 93° (p < 0.0001), and the average degree of anterior flexion improved from 47 to 98° (p < 0.0001). The median VAS pain score decreased from 7 to 1. Complications occurred in 12 cases (24 %).A total of 32 (64 %) patients rated their result as good or excellent, six (12 %) as satisfactory and 12 (24 %) as dissatisfied.

Conclusion

In revision shoulder arthroplasty after failed primary shoulder arthroplasty an inverse design can improve the functional outcome, and patient satisfaction is usually high. However, the complication rate of this procedure is also high, and patient selection and other treatment options should be carefully considered.

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Shoulder Arthroplasty Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Glenoid Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM (2011) Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2249–2254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett WP, Franklin JL, Jackins SE, Wyss CR, Matsen FA 3rd (1987) Total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:865–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen FA 3rd (1988) Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J Arthroplasty 3:39–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arntz CT, Jackins S, Matsen FA 3rd (1993) Prosthetic replacement of the shoulder for the treatment of defects in the rotator cuff and the surface of the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:485–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Field LD, Dines DM, Zabinski SJ, Warren RF (1997) Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for rotator cuff arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:18–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berth A, Pap G (2008) Hemi- versus bipolar shoulder arthroplasty for chronic rotator cuff arthropathy. Int Orthop 32:735–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuckerman JD, Scott AJ, Gallagher MA (2000) Hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:169–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2001) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1814–1822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU (1994) Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 307:27–36Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RMF, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1215–1223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plausinis D, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD (2005) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect 54:371–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd (2002) Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA (2003) Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:569–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheung E, Willis M, Walker M, Clark R, Frankle MA (2011) Complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:439–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farshad M, Gerber C (2010) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 34:1075–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly JD 2nd, Zhao JX, Hobgood ER, Norris TR (2012) Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty using the reverse prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1516–1525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dines JS, Fealy S, Strauss EJ, Allen A, Craig EV, Warren RF, Dines DM (2006) Outcomes analysis of revision total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1494–1500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Flury MP, Frey P, Goldhahn J, Schwyzer H-K, Simmen BR (2011) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure—midterm results. Int Orthop 35:53–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC (1981) UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 7–20Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG et al (1994) A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Resch H, Povacz P, Maurer H, Koller H, Tauber M (2008) Pectoralis major inverse plasty for functional reconstruction in patients with anterolateral deltoid deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:757–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G (2007) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1476–1485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D (2007) The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:292–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levy JC, Virani N, Pupello D, Frankle M (2007) Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker M, Willis MP, Brooks JP, Pupello D, Mulieri PJ, Frankle MA (2012) The use of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:514–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melis B, Bonnevialle N, Neyton L, Lévigne C, Favard L, Walch G, Boileau P (2012) Glenoid loosening and failure in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: is revision with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty a reliable option? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:342–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:147S–161SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Werner CML, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C (2005) Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1476–1486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gallo RA, Gamradt SC, Mattern CJ, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Dines DM, Warren RF (2011) Instability after reverse total shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:584–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nyffeler RW, Werner CML, Simmen BR, Gerber C (2004) Analysis of a retrieved delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:1187–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zavala JA, Clark JC, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ (2012) Management of deep infection after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(10):1310–1315Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beekman PDA, Katusic D, Berghs BM, Karelse A, De Wilde L (2010) One-stage revision for patients with a chronically infected reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:817–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dodson CC, Craig EV, Cordasco FA, Dines DM, Dines JS, Dicarlo E, Brause BD, Warren RF (2010) Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lädermann A, Lübbeke A, Mélis B, Stern R, Christofilopoulos P, Bacle G, Walch G (2011) Prevalence of neurologic lesions after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1288–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhold Ortmaier
    • 1
  • Herbert Resch
    • 1
  • Nicholas Matis
    • 1
  • Martina Blocher
    • 1
  • Alexander Auffarth
    • 1
  • Michael Mayer
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Hitzl
    • 2
  • Mark Tauber
    • 3
  1. 1.Unfallchirurgie und SporttraumatologieUniversitätsklinik der Paracelsus UniversitätSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.BiostatistikParacelsus Medical UniversitySalzburgAustria
  3. 3.Shoulder and Elbow ServiceATOS Clinic MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations