The effect of femoral component rotation on the five-year outcome of cemented mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty
- 417 Downloads
Performing total knee replacement, accurate alignment and neutral rotation of the femoral component are widely believed to be crucial for the ultimate success. Contrary to absolute bone referenced alignment, using a ligament balancing technique does not automatically rotate the femoral component parallel to the transepicondylar axis. In this context we established the hypothesis that rotational alignment of the femoral component parallel to the transepicondylar axis (0° ± 3°) results in better outcome than alignment outside of this range.
We analysed 204 primary cemented mobile bearing total knee replacements five years postoperatively. Femoral component rotation was measured on axial radiographs using the condylar twist angle (CTA). Knee society score, range of motion as well as subjective rating documented outcome.
In 96 knees the femoral component rotation was within the range 0 ± 3° (neutral rotation group), and in 108 knees the five-year postoperative rotational alignment of the femoral component was outside of this range (outlier group). Postoperative CTA showed a mean of 2.8° (±3.4°) internal rotation (IR) with a range between 6° external rotation (ER) and 15° IR (CI 95). No difference with regard to subjective and objective outcome could be detected.
The present work shows that there is a large given natural variability in optimal rotational orientation, in this study between 6° ER and 15° IR, with numerous co-factors determining correct positioning of the femoral component. Further studies substantiating pre- and postoperative determinants are required to complete the understanding of resulting biomechanics in primary TKA.
KeywordsTotal Knee Arthroplasty External Rotation Femoral Component Knee Society Score Rotational Alignment
- 2.Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH (2002) The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prosthesis—a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 140:149Google Scholar
- 10.Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 40–47Google Scholar
- 14.Büchel F (2002) Surgical technique of the LCS. In: Hamelynck KJ, Stiehl JB (eds) LCS-mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. Springer, New York, pp 121–135Google Scholar
- 18.Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y (2005) Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:193–197Google Scholar
- 19.Edwald F (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12Google Scholar
- 24.Chiavetta J, Fehring T, Odum S, Griffin W, Bohannon Mason J (2006) Importance of balanced-gap technique in rotation platform knees. Orthopedics 29:45–48Google Scholar
- 29.Fehring T (2006) Ligamentous balancing in rotating-platform knees. Orthop Traum Surg Res 29:56–59Google Scholar