International Orthopaedics

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 1399–1402 | Cite as

Incidence of osteotomies around the knee for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A 22-year population-based study

  • Tuukka T. Niinimäki
  • Antti Eskelinen
  • Pasi Ohtonen
  • Mika Junnila
  • Juhana Leppilahti
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Both tibial and femoral osteotomies have been used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Due to the clinical success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the current role and incidence of osteotomies remains unknown. The aim of this population-based study was to assess the incidence of osteotomies and compare it with that of knee arthroplasties.

Methods

From the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register, we identified all patients, aged 18 years or more, who had undergone osteotomy for the treatment of knee OA between 1987 and 2008. The number of arthroplasties was extracted from the Arthroplasty Register.

Results

A total of 6,004 osteotomies were performed for 5,734 patients. The average osteotomy incidence has steadily decreased by 6.2%, and TKA incidence has increased by 9.8% annually. However, in patients aged less than 50 years the osteotomy incidence has increased by 1.4% annually. The decline of osteotomy incidence has been steeper in females than in males (9.0% vs. 3.6%), and during the last decade osteotomies were more commonly performed in male patients.

Conclusion

Incidence of osteotomies for the treatment of knee OA has decreased during last two decades. However, in patients aged less than 50 years the osteotomy incidence has slightly increased. In a comparison by gender, females are more likely to undergo arthoplasty than osteotomy, and it would therefore appear that the current use of osteotomies is predominantly reserved for the treatment of knee OA in relatively young males.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Bhubinder Mann for reviewing the manuscript and revising the English.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87(A);7:1487–1497Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis—a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 78(1):128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright JM, Crockett HC, Slawski DP, Madsen MW, Windsor RE (2005) High tibial osteotomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(4):279–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolcott M, Traub S, Efird C (2010) High tibial osteotomies in the young active patient. Int Orthop 34:161–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amendelo A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wright J, Heck D, Hawker G, Dittus R, Freund D, Joyce D, Paul J, Young W, Coyte P (1995) Rates of tibial osteotomies in Canada and the United States. Clin Orthop 319:266–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W-Dahl A, Robertsson LL (2010) Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients – A Swedish register study. Acta Orthop Scand 81(2):161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niinimäki T, Murray DW, Partanen J, Pajala A, Leppilahti J (2011) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates. Knee 18(6):432–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Badley EM (2000) Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 342(16):1016–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keskimäki I, Aro S (1991) Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital discharge register. Int J Health Sci 2:15–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuukka T. Niinimäki
    • 1
  • Antti Eskelinen
    • 2
  • Pasi Ohtonen
    • 1
  • Mika Junnila
    • 3
  • Juhana Leppilahti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryOulu University HospitalOuluFinland
  2. 2.COXA Hospital for Joint ReplacementTampereFinland
  3. 3.Turku University HospitalTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations