International Orthopaedics

, Volume 35, Issue 10, pp 1489–1495 | Cite as

Taylor spatial frame in severe foot deformities using double osteotomy: technical approach and primary results

  • Hazibullah Waizy
  • Henning Windhagen
  • Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
  • Thilo Floerkemeier
Original Paper



The treatment of severe foot deformities in children or adolescents is complex and demanding to the surgeon. This paper describes the technical strategy of using a Taylor spatial frame and reports on the functional outcome.


The Taylor spatial frame was used by a single surgeon in patients with severe foot deformities. Seven patients with eight severe deformities were treated. Mean patient age at surgery was 15.1 (9–29) years. A double Taylor spatial frame reconstruction was mounted to the limb. All patients had a midtarsal osteotomy and an additional inverse dome-shaped calcaneus osteotomy. Assessed measures were pre- and postoperative deformity and associated complications and clinical results according to Ferreira et al.


Mean follow-up was 576.5 (359–987) days. The final functional outcome according to Ferreira was good in seven cases, fair in none, and poor in one. Early complications included pin-tract infection, temporary hypoesthesia, and temporary shortening of the tendon of the M. flexor digitorum. At follow-up there was no deformity recurrence.


In children or adolescents, the innovative treatment using the Taylor spatial frame and a double osteotomy allows joint-preserving correction of severe foot deformities. However, the complication rate is relatively high due to the severely deformed feet. Furthermore, the Taylor spatial frame is expensive. Thus, this treatment is only recommended for severe foot deformities and should be handled by experienced orthopedic surgeons.


  1. 1.
    Bradish CF, Noor S (2000) The Ilizarov method in the management of relapsed club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:387–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi IH, Yang MS, Chung CY et al (2001) The treatment of recurrent arthrogrypotic club foot in children by the Ilizarov method. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:731–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummings RJ, Davidson RS, Armstrong PF et al (2002) Congenital clubfoot. Instr Course Lect 51:385–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eidelman M, Bialik V, Katzman A (2006) Correction of deformities in children using the Taylor spatial frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eidelman M, Katzman A (2008) Treatment of complex foot deformities in children with the Taylor spatial frame. Orthopedics 31Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fadel M, Hosny G (2005) The Taylor spatial frame for deformity correction in the lower limbs. Int Orthop 29:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldman DS, Shin SS, Madan S et al (2003) Correction of tibial malunion and nonunion with six-axis analysis deformity correction using the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 17:549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferreira RC, Costa MT, Frizzo GG et al (2007) Correction of severe recurrent clubfoot using a simplified setting of the Ilizarov device. Foot Ankle Int 28:557–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferreira RC, Costo MT, Frizzo GG et al (2006) Correction of neglected clubfoot using the Ilizarov external fixator. Foot Ankle Int 27:266–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosny GA (2002) Correction of foot deformities by the Ilizarov method without corrective osteotomies or soft tissue release. J Pediatr Orthop B 11:121–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Atalar AC et al (2002) Correction of complex foot deformities using the Ilizarov external fixator. J Foot Ankle Surg 41:30–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lamm BM, Standard SC, Galley IJ et al (2006) External fixation for the foot and ankle in children. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 23:137–166, ixPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA (2007) Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:378–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakase T, Kitano M, Kawai H et al (2009) Distraction osteogenesis for correction of three-dimensional deformities with shortening of lower limbs by Taylor Spatial Frame. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 29(9):1197–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naqui SZ, Thiryayi W, Foster A et al (2008) Correction of simple and complex pediatric deformities using the Taylor-Spatial Frame. J Pediatr Orthop 28:640–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paley D (1993) The correction of complex foot deformities using Ilizarov's distraction osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 97–111Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rodl R, Leidinger B, Bohm A et al (2003) Correction of deformities with conventional and hexapod frames–comparison of methods. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:92–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers MJ, McFadyen I, Livingstone JA et al (2007) Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) in the correction of long bone fracture and deformity. J Orthop Trauma 21:337–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rozbruch SR, Segal K, Ilizarov S et al (2009) Does the Taylor Spatial Frame Accurately Correct Tibial Deformities? Clin Orthop Relat ResGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seybold D, Gessmann J, Ozokyay L et al (2009) [Deformity correction of post-traumatic tibial non-unions using the Taylor spatial frame]. Z Orthop Unfall 147:26–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sluga M, Pfeiffer M, Kotz R et al (2003) Lower limb deformities in children: two-stage correction using the Taylor spatial frame. J Pediatr Orthop B 12:123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hazibullah Waizy
    • 1
  • Henning Windhagen
    • 1
  • Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
    • 1
  • Thilo Floerkemeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic DepartmentHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations