Strategies for head and inlay exchange in revision hip arthroplasty
Due to the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed during the last three decades and the limited long-term survival, mainly because of wear, the number of revisions has increased during the last two years. If the implant itself is still considered to be stable, only head and inlay exchange is necessary. This requires comprehensive knowledge of the characteristics of the articulating materials by the surgeon as the wrong choice of wear couple can lead to early failure for a second time. The aim of this paper is to present considerations and strategies for head and inlay exchange in case of failure, either due to wear of the articulation material or of other indications for revision hip arthroplasty.
KeywordsRecurrent Dislocation Ceramic Head Ceramic Liner Ball Head Stable Stem
- 14.Karamat L, Pinggera O, Knahr K (2005) Blood analysis for trace metals in metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-cross-linked PE bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Hip International 15:136–142Google Scholar
- 27.Lee SC, Jung KA, Nam CH, Kim TH, Ahn NK, Hwang SH (2010) Acetabular screw head-induced ceramic acetabular liner fracture in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(5). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100329-30
- 28.Knahr K, Beck R (2002) An instrument for the insertion of ceramic liners. In: Garino JP, Willmann G (eds) Bioceramics in joint arthroplasty. Proceedings of the 7th International BIOLOX Symposium. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 71–75 Google Scholar