International Orthopaedics

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 497–502 | Cite as

Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system—a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips

  • Thomas Baad-Hansen
  • Stig Storgaard Jakobsen
  • Kjeld Soballe
Original Paper


There has been renewed interest for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing due to improved design and manufacturing of implants, better materials, and enhanced implant fixation. In contrast to conventional total hip replacements, only a few clinical hip resurfacing trials using radiostereometry (RSA) have been reported, and solely for the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The purpose of this RSA trial was to describe the migration pattern of a new hip resurfacing system (ReCap) within the first two years after primary surgery. Twenty-six patients underwent total hip replacement. The patients were followed-up for up to 24 months and were evaluated with the use of radiostereometric measurements. The prosthesis showed mean translations and rotation close to zero. Maximum translation was seen along the transverse axis in the medial direction (0.13 mm). No statistically significant translation or rotation was seen at two-years follow-up, (t-test, p <0.05, translation or rotation).


  1. 1.
    Lucht U, Johnsen Paaske S (2004) Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Annual report 2004. Accessed 09 February 2010
  2. 2.
    Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Jin Z (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:95–105Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scifert CF, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ (1998) A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:152–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P (2008) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:637–654. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2008) Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 23:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A:28–39Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1137–1142. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20524 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH (2008) Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1522–1527. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whittingham-Jones P, Charnley G, Francis J, Annapureddy S (2008) Internal fixation after subtrochanteric femoral fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.015 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mabilleau G, Kwon YM, Pandit H, Murray DW, Sabokbar A (2008) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions. Acta Orthop 79:734–747. doi:10.1080/17453670810016795 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gagala J, Mazurkiewicz T (2007) First experiences with total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 72:311–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itayem R, Arndt A, McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Lundberg A (2007) A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1140–1143. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18367 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A (2005) Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:158–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2004) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karrholm J (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand 60:491–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beaule PE, Matar WY, Poitras P, Smit K, May O (2009) 2008 otto aufranc award: Component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:84–93. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0541-8 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cawley J, Metcalf JEP, Jonesa AH, Band TJ, Skupien DS (2003) A tribological study of cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys used in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Wear 255:999–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ginai AZ, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2006) Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment. Acta Orthop 77:531–540. doi:10.1080/17453670610012557 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krijnen MR, Valstar ER, Smit TH, Wuisman PI (2006) Does bioresorbable cage material influence segment stability in spinal interbody fusion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:33–38. doi:10.1097/ PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelissen RG, Doets HC, Valstar ER (2006) Early migration of the tibial component of the Buechel–Pappas total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:146–151. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000224013.57916.24 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants 1. Acta Orthop 76:563–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryd L (1992) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. Clin Orthop 276:56–65Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Derbyshire B, Prescott RJ, Porter ML (2009) Notes on the use and interpretation of radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 80:124–130. doi:10.1080/17453670902807474 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip 7. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1874–1877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beaule PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E (2004) Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis 1. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2015–2021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beaule PE, Krismer M, Mayrhofer P, Wanner S, Le Duff M, Mattesich M, Stoeckl B, Amstutz HC, Biedermann R (2005) EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip 1. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:741–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Baad-Hansen
    • 1
  • Stig Storgaard Jakobsen
    • 1
  • Kjeld Soballe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAarhus University HospitalAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations