International Orthopaedics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 127–133 | Cite as

A new classification and guide for surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis

  • E. OguzEmail author
  • A. Sehirlioglu
  • M. Altinmakas
  • C. Ozturk
  • M. Komurcu
  • C. Solakoglu
  • A. R. Vaccaro
Original Paper


So far, there is no widely accepted classification system based on objective findings that can serve as a guide in selecting the treatment method for spinal tuberculosis. This retrospective study evaluates patients with spinal tuberculosis (Pott’s disease) treated with different surgical procedures. Our aim was to outline a new classification of spinal tuberculosis. A retrospective review of 76 cases (55 male and 25 female patients) of spinal tuberculosis was conducted. Five of the patients were treated medically, and the others who were treated surgically were classified into three types (I, II and III) according to the new classification system for spinal tuberculosis. All 76 patients were classifiable by this new system. The most common complication observed was local kyphosis (maximum 8 degrees) in type-II patients, but none of the patients needed correction. No neurological deterioration was observed in any of the cases. This new classification system helps in differentiating the various manifestations of spinal tuberculosis and appears to correlate with the surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis. We believe that this new classification system can be used as a practical guide in the treatment of Pott’s disease.


Disc Degeneration Abscess Formation Posterior Instrumentation Spinal Tuberculosis Epidural Abscess 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Il n’y a pas de système permettant de classer de façon objective les méthodes de traitement de la tuberculose osseuse. Cette étude rétrospective évalue les patients présentant une maladie de Pott, traités avec différentes techniques dans le but avoué de mettre en évidence une nouvelle classification de cette pathologie. Une étude rétrospective de 76 cas (55 hommes et 25 femmes) de tuberculose osseuse a été réalisée. Cinq patients ont été traités médicalement, les autres chirurgicalement en les classant en trois types A, B et C, selon la nouvelle classification. Les 76 patients ont été classés avec ce nouveau système. La complication la plus habituelle observée a été la cyphose locale (max. 8°) dans les types II. Mais il n’a pas été nécessaire chez ces patients de réaliser une correction chirurgicale. Nous n’avons observé aucune détérioration sur le plan neurologique. Cette nouvelle classification permet de différencier les différentes manifestations de la tuberculose osseuse et permet de faire une corrélation avec le traitement chirurgical. Nous espérons qu’elle pourra être utilisée et réaliser ainsi un guide pratique du traitement du mal de Pott.


  1. 1.
    Al Muhlim F, Ibrahim E, El Hassan A (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of tuberculous spondylitis. Spine 20:2287–2292Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alothman A, Memish ZA, Awada A, et al (2001) Tuberculous spondylitis: analysis of 69 cases from Saudi Arabia. Spine 26:E565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al Sebai MW, Al-Khawashki H, Al-Arabi K, et al (2001) Operative treatment of progressive deformity in spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop 25:322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bidstrup C, Andersen PH, Skinhoj P, Andersen AB (2002) Tuberculous meningitis in a country with low incidence of tuberculosis. Scand J Infect Dis 34:811–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boachi-Adjei O, Squillante RG (1996) Tuberculosis of the spine. Orthop Clin North Am 27:95–103Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen WJ, Wu CC, Jung CH, Chen LH, Niu CC, Lai PL (2002) Combined anterior and posterior surgeries in the treatment of spinal tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop 398:50–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dinc H, Sari A, Yalug G, Gumele HR (1996) CT-guided drainage of multilocular pelvic and gluteal tuberculosis abscesses. Case Report. AJR 167:667–668Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faraj AA (2001) Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:463–464Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, et al (2003) Two-stage (posterior and anterior) surgical treatment using posterior spinal instrumentation for pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis. Spine 28:E302–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghadouane M, Elmansari O, Bousalmame N, Lezrek K, Aouam H, Moulay I (1996) Role of surgery in the treatment of Pott’s disease in adults. Apropos of 29 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 82:620–628Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopalakrishnan D, Krishna KN (2002) Cervicothoracic junction spinal tuberculosis presenting as radiculopathy. Neurol India 50(1):93–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Govender S, Parbhoo AH (1999) Support of the anterior column with allografts in tuberculosis of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg, Br Vol 81:106–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Govender S, Parbhoo AH, Kumar K (2001) Tuberculosis of the cervicodorsal junction. J Pediatr Orthop 21(3):285–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guven O, Kumano K, Yalcin S (1994) A single-stage posterior approach and rigid fixation for preventing kyphosis in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Spine 19:1039–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hosoglu S, Geyik MF, Balik I, et al (2002) Predictors of outcome in patients with tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 6:64–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Chen SH, Liu HP (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in managing tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop 379:143–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jain R, Sawhney S, Berry M (1993) Computed tomography of vertebral tuberculosis: patterns of bone destruction. Clin Radiol 47:196–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim DJ, Yun YH, Moon SH, Riew KD (2004) Posterior instrumentation using compressive laminar hooks and anterior interbody arthrodesis for the treatment of tuberculosis of the lower lumbar spine. Spine 29:E275–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Korkusuz F, Islam C, Korkusuz Z (1997) Prevention of postoperative late kyphosis in Pott’s disease by anterior decompression and intervertebral grafting. World J Surg 21:524–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar K (1985) A clinical study and classification of posterior spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop 9:147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McLain RF, Isada C (2004) Spinal tuberculosis deserves a place on radar screen. Clevel Clin J Med 71:537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of Spine (1999) Five year assessment of controlled trials of short-course chemotherapy regimens of 6, 9 or 18 months duration for spinal tuberculosis in patients ambulatory from the start of undergoing radical surgery: fourteenth report of the Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine. Int Orthop 23:73–81Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehta JS, Bhojraj SY (2001) Tuberculosis of thoracic spine. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83:859–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moon MS (1997) Tuberculosis of the spine: controversies and a new challenge. Spine 22:1791–1797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moon MS, Moon YW, Moon JL, Kim SS, Sun DH (2002) Conservative treatment of tuberculosis of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 398:40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mückley T, Schütz T, Kirschner M, Potulski M, Hofmann G, Bühren V (2003) Psoas abscess: the spine as a primary source of infection. Spine 28:E106–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ozdemir HM, Us AK, Ogun T (2003) The role of anterior spinal instrumentation and allograft fibula for the treatment of pott disease. Spine 28:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rajasekaran S (2002) The problem of deformity in spinal tuberculosis. Clin Orthop 398:85–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rezai AR, Lee M, Cooper PR (1995) Modern management of spinal tuberculosis. Neurosurgery 36:87–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Upadhyay SS, Sell P, Saji MS (1994) Surgical management of spinal tuberculosis in adults. Clin Orthop 302:173–182PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Oguz
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Sehirlioglu
    • 1
  • M. Altinmakas
    • 1
  • C. Ozturk
    • 2
  • M. Komurcu
    • 1
  • C. Solakoglu
    • 3
  • A. R. Vaccaro
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryGulhane Military Medical AcademyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryTurkish Armed Forces Rehabilitation and Care CenterAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyHaydarpasa Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Thomas Jefferson University and the Rothman InstitutePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations