International Orthopaedics

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 228–231 | Cite as

Surgical treatment for large and massive tears of the rotator cuff

Original Paper

Abstract

Patients with a large or massive tear of the rotator cuff were, when possible, treated with the McLaughlin procedure. A patch graft was used when it was impossible to perform this procedure. The patch group (group P) consisted of nine patients with nine shoulders (six men, three women) with a mean age of 62.8±6.9 years. The McLaughlin group (group M) consisted of 12 patients with 12 shoulders (ten men, two women) with a mean age of 52.3±8.6 years. Mean follow-up was 2 years 11 months in group P and 4 years 2 months in group M. Using the shoulder scoring system of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score), the total score improved post-operatively in both groups. In group P, the post-operative score was 91.7 (pre-operative score 47.9) and in group M 92.0 (pre-operative score 54.2). Tears recurred in three shoulders within 2 months of the McLaughlin procedure, and these patients were excluded from the study. The rate of 're-tearing' was lower with a patch graft (0/13) than with the McLaughlin procedure (3/17).

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Humeral Head Rotator Cuff Tear Rotator Cuff Repair Excessive Tension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

Des malades avec une large déchirure de la coiffe des rotateurs furent traités soit par le procédé de McLaughlin quand c'était possible soit par une greffe en patch. Le groupe avec greffe (groupe P) était constitué de 9 épaules chez 9 malades (6 hommes, 3 femmes) avec un âge moyen de 62.8±6.9 années. Le groupe McLaughlin (groupe M) comportait 12 épaules chez 12 malades (10 hommes, 2 femmes) avec un âge moyen de 52.3±8.6 années. Le suivi moyen était de 35 mois dans le groupe P, et 50 mois dans le groupe M. En utilisant le système de cotation de l'épaule de l'Association Orthopédique Japonaise (JOA score), le score total a été amélioré en postopératoire dans les deux groupes. Dans le groupe P le score postopératoire était 91.7 ( 47.9 avant l'opération) et dans le groupe M le score postopératoire était 92.0 ( 54.2 avant l'opération). Les déchirures ont récidivés dans 3 épaules dans les 2 mois suivant le procédé de McLaughlin et ces malades a été exclus de l'étude. Le taux de récidive était plus faible avec une greffe en patch (0/13) qu'avec la méthode de McLaughlin (3/17).

References

  1. 1.
    Burkhart SS (1991) Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop 267:45–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cofield RH (1982) Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 154:667–672Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cofield RH, Lanzer WL (1985) Pathology of rotator cuff tearing and methods of tendon repair. Orthop Trans 9:42Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Debeyre J, Patte D, Elmelik E (1965) Repair of ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder with a note on advancement of the supraspinatus muscle. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 47:36–42Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerber C (1992) Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop 275:152–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heikel HVA (1968) Rupture of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Experiences of surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 39:477–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLaughlin HL (1944) Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder: The exposure and treatment of tears with retraction. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 26:31–51Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasca RJ (1988) The use of freeze-dried allografts in the management of global rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop 228:218–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neer CS (1983) Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop 173:70–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neviaser JS (1971) Ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. New concepts in the diagnosis and operative treatment of chronic ruptures. Arch Surg 102:483–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neviaser JS, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ (1978) The repair of chronic massive ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder by use of a freeze-dried rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:681–684Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ (1982) Transfer of subscapularis and teres minor for massive defects of rotator cuff. In: Bayley I, Kessel L (eds) Shoulder surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 60–63Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nobuhara K, Hata Y, Komai M (1994) Surgical procedure and results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop 304:54–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ozake J, Fujimoto S, Masuhara K et al (1986) Reconstruction of chronic massive rotator cuff tears with synthetic materials. Clin Orthop 202:173–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paulos LE, Meislin RJ, Drawbert J (1994) The acromion-splitting approach for large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 22(3):306–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thur C, Julke M (1995) The anterolateral deltoid muscle flap-plasty. The procedure of choice in large rotator cuff defects. Unfallchirurg 98:415–421PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryYokohama Municipal Citizen's HospitalYokohama 240–0062Japan

Personalised recommendations