Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 456–460 | Cite as

Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a radiological study of 12 cases and a review of the literature

  • D. Casas
  • R. Pérez-Andrés
  • J. A. Jiménez
  • A. Mariscal
  • P. Cuadras
  • M. Salas
  • M. C. Gómez-Plaza
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background: Twelve cases of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) are presented, and their radiologic appearance is described.

Methods: Four men and eight women, aged 31–82 years old, with XGC were reviewed. Abdominal ultrasound (US) was performed in all patients. Computed tomograpy (CT) was performed in five patients, barium enema examination in two, and percutaneously CT-guided fine-needle aspirative biopsy of the gallbladder in one.

Results: Barium enema examination showed an indentation of the hepatic flexure. Cholelithiasis was present in all patients, and sludge was present in six. The gallbladder wall was thickened in all patients, irregular in nine, and could not be properly differentiated from surrounding liver parenchyma or from other adjacent structures in most patients. A curvilinear halo, hypoechoic on US and with low attenuation on Ct, within the gallbladder wall was found in three patients and pericholecystic fluid in two others. On CT, the pericholecystic fat had streaky soft tissue densities in three cases. Percutaneously CT-guided fine-needle aspirative biopsy of the gallbladder was nondiagnostic. The diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma was considered preoperatively in three patients.

Conclusion: Despite the characteristic histologic appearance of XCG, radiologic findings are nonspecific, varying from signs observed in other forms of cholecystitis to the appearance of a gallbladder neoplasm.

Key words

Cholecystitis Granuloma Xanthomatosis Histocytic Ultrasonography Computed tomography 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Christensen AH, Ishak KG. Benign tumors and pseudotumors of the gall bladder: report of 180 cases. Arch Pathol 1970;90:423–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodman ZD, Ishak KG. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Am J Surg Pathol 1981;5:653–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reyes CV, Jablokow VR, Reid R. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: report of seven cases. Am Surg 1981;47:322–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard TJ, Bennion RS, Thompson JE Jr. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a chronic inflammatory pseudotumor of the gallbladder. Am Surg 1991;57:821–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roberts KM, Parsons MA. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: clinico-pathological study of 13 cases. J Clin Pathol 1987;40:412–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitagawa S, Nakagawa M, Yamada T, et al. Clinico-pathological study of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1990;91:1001–1010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solanki RL, Arora HL, Gaur SK, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC): a clinicopathological study of 21 cases. Ind J Pathol Microbiol 1989;32:256–260Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Houston JP, Collins MC, Cameron I, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Br J Surg 1994;81:1030–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Düber C, Störkel S, Wagner PK, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking carcinoma of the gallbledder: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:1195–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanada K, Nakata H, Nakayam T, et al. Radiologic findings in xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. AJR 1987;148:727–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delamarre J, Capron JP, Sevenet F, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. CT findings in a pseudotumoral form. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1985;9:732–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khilnani MT, Wolf BS, Finkel M. Roentgen features of carcinoma of the gallbladder on barium-meal examination. Radiology 1962;79:264–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghahremani GG, Meyers MM. The cholecysto-colic relationships. A roentgen-anatomic study of the colonic manifestations of gallbladder disorders. AJR 1975;125:21–34Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Gaetano AM, Breda M, Maresca G, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: echographic and CT patterns. Rays 1985;10:63–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lichtman JB, Varma VA. Ultrasound demonstration of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:324–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cossi AF, Scholz FJ, Aretz HT, et al. Computed tomography of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. Gastrointest Radiol 1987;12:154–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thorsen MK, Quiroz F, Lawson TL, et al. Primary biliary carcinoma: CT evaluation. Radiology 1984;152:479–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rooholamini SA, Tehrani NS, Razavi MK, et al. Imaging of gallbladder carcinoma. RadioGraphics 1994;14:291–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kane RA, Costello P, Duszlak E. Computed tomography in acute cholecystitis: new observations. AJR 1983;141:697–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smathers RL, Lee JKT, Heiken JP. Differentiation of complicated cholecystitis from gallbladder carcinoma by computed tomography. AJR 1984;143:255–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lim JH, Ko YT, Kim SY. Ultrasound changes of the gallbladder wall in cholecystitis: a sonographic-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 1987;38:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hales MS, Miller TR. Diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis by fine needle aspiration biopsy. A case report. Acta Cytol 1987;31:493–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sease WC, Elyaderani MK, Belis JA. Ultrasonography and needle aspiration in diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Urology 1987;29:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zargar SA, Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, et al. US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of gallbladder masses. Radiology 1991;179:275–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferruci JT, Wittenberg J, Margolies MN, et al. Malignant seeding of the tract after thin-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1979;130:345–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Casas
    • 1
  • R. Pérez-Andrés
    • 1
  • J. A. Jiménez
    • 1
  • A. Mariscal
    • 1
  • P. Cuadras
    • 1
  • M. Salas
    • 2
  • M. C. Gómez-Plaza
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBadalonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBadalonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of PathologyHospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBadalonaSpain

Personalised recommendations