Imaging guidelines for acute pancreatitis: when and when not to image

  • Ana Paola Campos Rocha
  • Khoschy SchawkatEmail author
  • Koenraad J. Mortele
Special Section: Pancreatitis


In patients with acute pancreatitis (AP), diagnostic imaging is performed for various reasons, including the detection of the etiology (e.g., biliary obstruction caused by gallstones), diagnosis of pancreatitis in an unclear clinical setting, assessment of the severity of the process, and evaluation of its complications. In spite of the potential benefits of these imaging studies in the setting of AP, especially economic consequences but also medical risks are associated with diagnostic imaging, including increase of the effective radiation dose received by patients with AP and rising health care costs, frequently without impact on management. The rising incidence of acute pancreatitis in the Western world is escalating its financial burden with national health care expenses of over 2.5 billion dollars annually. Despite evidence-based national recommendations on utilization of diagnostic imaging in patients with AP, unnecessary imaging studies are still frequently performed, especially in the early hospital course. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to review the imaging guidelines for acute pancreatitis with regards to when and when not to image, with the aim to minimize inappropriate utilization.


Acute pancreatitis Pancreas Guidelines Imaging Cross-sectional imaging Diagnosis 



Acute pancreatitis


Computed tomography (CT)


Magnetic resonance


Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography


Intensive care unit


Systemic inflammatory response syndrome




Idiopathic acute pancreatitis


Endoscopic ultrasonography


Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography


Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography


Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography


CT severity index




Common bile duct


Intraoperative cholangiography


Randomized controlled trials


Contrast-enhanced US


Diffusion-weighted imaging


Multidetector CT



Khoschy Schawkat received a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) with Grant No. 181917 and Swiss Society of Radiology.


The authors have nothing to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH (2005) Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 234 (3):824-832. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matin A, Bates DW, Sussman A, Ros P, Hanson R, Khorasani R (2006) Inpatient radiology utilization: trends over the past decade. AJR American journal of roentgenology 186 (1):7-11. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, Conwell DL, Banks PA, Khorasani R (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital–analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258 (1):174-181. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kothari S, Kalinowski M, Kobeszko M, Almouradi T (2019) Computed tomography scan imaging in diagnosing acute uncomplicated pancreatitis: Usefulness vs cost. World journal of gastroenterology 25 (9):1080-1087. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ball CG, Correa-Gallego C, Howard TJ, Zyromski NJ, House MG, Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Akisik F, Lillemoe KD (2010) Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much? Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 14 (10):1529-1535. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iglehart JK (2009) Health insurers and medical-imaging policy–a work in progress. N Engl J Med 360 (10):1030-1037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav D, Lowenfels AB (2013) The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 144 (6):1252-1261. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62 (1):102-111. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porter KK, Cason DE, Morgan DE (2018) Acute Pancreatitis: How Can MR Imaging Help. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 26 (3):439-450. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thoeni RF (2015) Imaging of Acute Pancreatitis. Radiologic clinics of North America 53 (6):1189-1208. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (2013). Pancreatology 13 (4, Supplement 2):e1-e15. doi:
  12. 12.
    Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, Repas K, van Es HW, Banks PA, Mortele KJ (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. The American journal of gastroenterology 107 (4):612-619. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleszler F, Friedenberg F, Krevsky B, Friedel D, Braitman LE (2003) Abdominal computed tomography prolongs length of stay and is frequently unnecessary in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis. The American journal of the medical sciences 325 (5):251-255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siddiqui N, Vendrami CL, Chatterjee A, Miller FH (2018) Advanced MR Imaging Techniques for Pancreas Imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 26 (3):323-344. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandrasegaran K, Tahir B, Barad U, Fogel E, Akisik F, Tirkes T, Sherman S (2017) The Value of Secretin-Enhanced MRCP in Patients With Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. AJR American journal of roentgenology 208 (2):315-321. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wan J, Ouyang Y, Yu C, Yang X, Xia L, Lu N (2018) Comparison of EUS with MRCP in idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 87 (5):1180-1188.e1189. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reynolds PT, Brady EK, Chawla S (2018) The utility of early cross-sectional imaging to evaluate suspected acute mild pancreatitis. Annals of gastroenterology 31 (5):628-632. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobbs NW, Budak MJ, Weir-McCall JR, Vinnicombe SJ, Zealley IA (2016) Acute pancreatitis: a comparison of intervention rates precipitated by early vs guideline CT scan timing. Clinical radiology 71 (10):993-996. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, Tuynman HA, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study. Pancreatology 10 (2-3):222-228. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nordback I, Pelli H, Lappalainen-Lehto R, Jarvinen S, Raty S, Sand J (2009) The recurrence of acute alcohol-associated pancreatitis can be reduced: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 136 (3):848-855. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M (2006) Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 63 (7):1037-1045. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, O’Connell M, Sanders MK, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC (2010) Comparison of BISAP, Ranson’s, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. The American journal of gastroenterology 105 (2):435-441; quiz 442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, Shankar S, Zou KH, Kalantari BN, Perez A, vanSonnenberg E, Ros PR, Banks PA, Silverman SG (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR American journal of roentgenology 183 (5):1261-1265. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raghuwanshi S, Gupta R, Vyas MM, Sharma R (2016) CT Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis and its Prognostic Correlation with CT Severity Index. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR 10 (6):Tc06-11.
  25. 25.
    Smeets X, Litjens G, da Costa DW, Kievit W, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MGH, Fockens P, Bruno MJ, Kolkman JJ, Drenth JPH, Bollen TL, van Geenen EJM (2018) The association between portal system vein diameters and outcomes in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vilmann AS, Menachery J, Tang SJ, Srinivasan I, Vilmann P (2015) Endosonography guided management of pancreatic fluid collections. World journal of gastroenterology 21 (41):11842-11853. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM (2013) Equal Efficacy of Endoscopic and Surgical Cystogastrostomy for Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 145 (3):583-590.e581. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bingener J, Ibrahim-zada I (2014) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for intra-abdominal emergency conditions. The British journal of surgery 101 (1):e80-89. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gardner TB (2012) Endoscopic management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 76 (6):1214-1223. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roch AM, Maatman TK, Carr RA, Colgate CL, Ceppa EP, House MG, Lopes J, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Zyromski NJ (2019) Venous Thromboembolism in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: an Underappreciated Risk. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203 (3):773-778. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gomez-Torres GA, Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Lopez-Lizarraga CR, Navarro-Muniz E, Ortega-Garcia OS, Bonnet-Lemus FM, Abarca-Rendon FM, De la Cerda-Trujillo LF (2018) Intraoperative cholangiography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective study in a second-level hospital. Medicine (Baltimore) 97 (44):e12976. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tse F, Yuan Y (2012) Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (5):Cd009779.
  34. 34.
    van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Fischer K, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Gooszen HG, Erpecum KJ (2011) Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis. Endoscopy 43 (1):8-13. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee SL, Kim HK, Choi HH, Jeon BS, Kim TH, Choi JM, Ku YM, Kim SW, Kim SS, Chae HS (2018) Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis. Pancreatology 18 (1):22-28. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mofidi R, Lee AC, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ, Parks RW (2008) The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Pancreatology 8 (1):55-60. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Tso WK, Wong Y, Poon RT, Lam CM, Wong BC, Wong J (2005) Comparison of early endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 3 (12):1238-1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, Yamamoto N, Hirano K, Komatsu Y, Tada M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Ohtomo K, Omata M (2005) Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. European journal of radiology 54 (2):271-275. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baker ME, Nelson RC, Rosen MP, Blake MA, Cash BD, Hindman NM, Kamel IR, Kaur H, Piorkowski RJ, Qayyum A, Yarmish GM (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound quarterly 30 (4):267-273. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SW, Cheon YK, Ahn HC, Kim YS, Kim YS, Lee JS, Lee MS, Lee HK, Shim CS, Kim BS (2005) The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. The American journal of gastroenterology 100 (5):1051-1057. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Golea A, Badea R, Socaciu M, Diaconu B, Iacob D (2010) Quantitative analysis of tissue perfusion using contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Medical ultrasonography 12 (3):198-204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ripolles T, Martinez MJ, Lopez E, Castello I, Delgado F (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis. European radiology 20 (10):2518-2523. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    George E, Wortman JR, Fulwadhva UP, Uyeda JW, Sodickson AD (2017) Dual energy CT applications in pancreatic pathologies. The British Journal of Radiology 90 (1080):20170411. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Badat N, Millet I, Corno L, Khaled W, Boulay-Coletta I, Zins M (2019) Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement. European radiology 29 (5):2302-2310. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bouwense SA, van Brunschot S, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Bakker OJ, Banks PA, Boermeester MA, Cappendijk VC, Carter R, Charnley R, van Eijck CH, Freeny PC, Hermans JJ, Hough DM, Johnson CD, Lameris JS, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Mortele KJ, Sarr MG, Stedman B, Vege SS, Werner J, Dijkgraaf MG, Gooszen HG, Horvath KD (2017) Describing Peripancreatic Collections According to the Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis: An International Interobserver Agreement Study. Pancreas 46 (7):850-857. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tang MY, Chen TW, Bollen TL, Wang YX, Xue HD, Jin ZY, Huang XH, Xiao B, Li XH, Ji YF, Zhang XM (2018) MR imaging of hemorrhage associated with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 18 (4):363-369. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Islim F, Salik AE, Bayramoglu S, Guven K, Alis H, Turhan AN (2014) Non-invasive detection of infection in acute pancreatic and acute necrotic collections with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings. Abdominal imaging 39 (3):472-481. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Arvanitakis M, Koustiani G, Gantzarou A, Grollios G, Tsitouridis I, Haritandi-Kouridou A, Dimitriadis A, Arvanitakis C (2007) Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-a comparative study. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver 39 (5):473-482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Viremouneix L, Monneuse O, Gautier G, Gruner L, Giorgi R, Allaouchiche B, Pilleul F (2007) Prospective evaluation of nonenhanced MR imaging in acute pancreatitis. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 26 (2):331-338. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kim YK, Kim CS, Han YM (2009) Role of fat-suppressed t1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis: an intraindividual comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Journal of computer assisted tomography 33 (5):651-656. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Paola Campos Rocha
    • 1
  • Khoschy Schawkat
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Koenraad J. Mortele
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital Zurich, University ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations