Locally advanced rectal cancer: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in restaging after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy
- 72 Downloads
To determine the added value of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) restaging after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT).
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was performed of 21 patients with LARC treated with CRT. All patients were evaluated with 1.5 T conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI (0–1000 s/mm²) before starting therapy and after neoadjuvant CRT. All included patients underwent surgery after CRT: the histopathological evaluation of surgical specimens represented the reference standard for local staging after neoadjuvant therapy. The qualitative analysis was carried out by two operators in consensus, who reviewed the conventional MR image set [T1-weighted and T2-weighted morphological sequences + dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (DCE)] and the combined set of conventional and DW images. For the quantitative analysis, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured at each examination. For each lesion, the mean ADC value (ADCpre and ADCpost) and the ΔADC (ADCpost – ADCpre) were calculated, and values of the three groups of response [complete response (pCR), partial response (pPR), stable disease (pSD)] were compared.
In LARC restaging, conventional MRI showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 50%, with a total diagnostic capacity of 71.40%, while by adding DWI sensitivity increased to 100%, specificity to 67%, and total diagnostic capacity to 90.40%. ΔADC correlates with treatment response and a cutoff of 1.35 × 10−3 mm²/s predicts the pCR with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 83.3%.
Adding DWI to conventional sequences may improve MRI capability to evaluate tumor response to CRT. The quantitative DWI assessment is promising, but larger studies are required.
KeywordsLARC DWI Chemo-radiotherapy
- 3.Habr-Gama A, Perez MO, Nadalin W, et al., Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results, Ann Surg, 2004;240:711-717.Google Scholar
- 15.The American Joint Commettee on Cancer, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition, 2017.Google Scholar
- 18.Jang KM, Kim SH, Choi D, et al., Pathological correlation with diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: preliminary results, Br J Radiol, 2012;85:e566-e572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al., New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1), Eur J Cancer, 2009;45:228-247.Google Scholar
- 39.Nougaret S, Vargas HA, Lakhman Y, et al., Intravoxel Incoherent Motion histogram metrics for assessment of response after combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal cancer: initial experience and comparison between single-section and volumetric analyses, Radiology, 2016;280(2):446-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Intven M, Monninkhof EM, Reerink O, Philippens ME, Combined T2w volumetry, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI for response assessment after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer, Acta Oncol, 2015;27:1-8.Google Scholar
- 47.Blazic IM, Lilic GB, Gajic MM, Quantitative assessment of rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy: comparison of three methods of positioning region of interest for ADC measurements at diffusion-weighted MR imaging, Radiology, 2017;282(2):418-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar