Advertisement

A comparison of segmented abdominopelvic fluid volumes with conventional CT signs of abdominal compartment syndrome in a trauma population

  • Thomas W. K. Battey
  • David DreizinEmail author
  • Uttam K. Bodanapally
  • Amelia Wnorowski
  • Ghada Issa
  • Anthony Iacco
  • William Chiu
Peritoneum
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the utility of abdominopelvic fluid volume measurements with established computed tomography signs for refractory post-traumatic abdominal compartment syndrome.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study included 64 consecutive adult trauma patients with preoperative CT and diagnosis of refractory abdominal compartment syndrome requiring decompressive laparotomy at a level I trauma referral center between 2004 and 2014. We hypothesized that abdominal fluid volume measurements would be more predictive of the need for early laparotomy than previously described conventional CT signs of refractory ACS. Abdominopelvic fluid volumes were determined quantitatively using semi-automated segmentation software. The following conventional imaging parameters were recorded: abdominal anteroposterior:transverse ratio (round belly sign); infrahepatic vena cava diameter; distal abdominal aortic diameter; largest single small bowel wall diameter; hydronephrosis, inguinal herniation; and mesenteric and body wall edema. For outcome analysis, patients were stratified into two groups: those who underwent early (< 24 h) and late (≥ 24 h) decompressive laparotomy following CT. Correlation analysis, comparison of means, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results

Abdominal fluid volumes (p = 0.001) and anteroposterior:transverse ratio (p = 0.009) were increased and inferior vena cava diameter (p = 0.009) was decreased in the early decompressive laparotomy group. Multivariate analysis including conventional CT variables, fluid volumes, and laboratory values revealed abdominal fluid volumes (p = 0.012; Δ in log odds of 1.002/mL) as the only independent predictor of early decompressive laparotomy.

Conclusions

Segmented abdominopelvic free fluid volumes had greater predictive utility for decision to perform early decompressive laparotomy than previously described ACS-related CT signs in trauma patients who developed refractory abdominal compartment syndrome.

Keywords

Abdominal compartment syndrome Trauma Computed tomography Quantitative imaging Abdominopelvic fluid volume 

Notes

Funding

Thomas W.K. Battey was supported by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Medical Student Research Grant #RMS1603. David Dreizin is supported by an RSNA Research Scholar Grant #RSCH1605. This funder had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

IRB Approval: This study was approved by the University of Maryland Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

References

  1. 1.
    Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, Duchesne J, Bjorck M, Leppaniemi A, Ejike JC. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive care medicine. 2013;39(7):1190-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balogh ZJ, Lumsdaine W, Moore EE, Moore FA. Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome: from recognition to prevention. The Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1466-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raeburn CD, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Johnson JL, Meldrum DR, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Burch JM. The abdominal compartment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery. The American journal of surgery. 2001;182(6):542-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biffl WL, Moore EE, Burch JM, Offner PJ, Franciose RJ, Johnson JL. Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome is a highly lethal event. The American journal of surgery. 2001;182(6):645-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gracias VH, Braslow B, Johnson J, Pryor J, Gupta R, Reilly P, Schwab CW. Abdominal compartment syndrome in the open abdomen. Archives of Surgery. 2002;137(11):1298-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strang SG, Van Imhoff DL, Van Lieshout EM, D’Amours SK, Van Waes OJ. Identifying patients at risk for high-grade intra-abdominal hypertension following trauma laparotomy. Injury. 2015;46(5):843-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheatham ML, Safcsak K. Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival? Critical care medicine. 2010;38(2):402-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Velmahos G. Comment on: Offner PJ, de Souza AL, Moore EE, et al. Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma. . Arch Surg 2001;136(6):676-81.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Cocanour CS, Kozar RA, Valdivia A, Sailors RM, Moore FA. Supranormal trauma resuscitation causes more cases of abdominal compartment syndrome. Archives of Surgery. 2003;138(6):637-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muresan M, Muresan S, Brinzaniuc K, Voidazan S, Sala D, Jimborean O, Hussam AH, Bara Jr T, Popescu G, Borz C. How much does decompressive laparotomy reduce the mortality rate in primary abdominal compartment syndrome?: A single-center prospective study on 66 patients. Medicine. 2017;96(5).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pickhardt PJ, Shimony JS, Heiken JP, Buchman TG, Fisher AJ. The abdominal compartment syndrome: CT findings. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1999;173(3):575-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Bahrani A, Abid G, Sahgal E, O'shea S, Lee S, Ammori B. A prospective evaluation of CT features predictive of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill surgical patients. Clinical radiology. 2007;62(7):676-82.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laffargue G, Taourel P, Saguintaah M, Lesnik A. CT diagnosis of abdominal compartment syndrome. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178(3):771-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IntelliSpace Portal (ISP): Advanced visualization for real-time radiology (brochure). NV: Koninklijke Philips Electronics 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Syngo.via – Get the full picture: The 3D routine and advanced reading solution (brochure). Siemens AG; 2013.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    iNtuition: Sophistication and power in the datacenter. Simplicity and elegance at your fingertips (brochure). TeraRecon, Inc.; 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dreizin D, Bodanapally UK, Neerchal N, Tirada N, Patlas M, Herskovits E. Volumetric analysis of pelvic hematomas after blunt trauma using semi-automated seeded region growing segmentation: a method validation study. Abdominal Radiology. 2016;41(11):2203-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dreizin D, Bodanapally U, Boscak A, Tirada N, Issa G, Nascone JW, Bivona L, Mascarenhas D, O’Toole RV, Nixon E. CT Prediction Model for Major Arterial Injury after Blunt Pelvic Ring Disruption. Radiology. 2018;287(3):1061-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dreizin D, Bodanapally U, Mascarenhas D, O’Toole RV, Tirada N, Issa G, Nascone J. Quantitative MDCT assessment of binder effects after pelvic ring disruptions using segmented pelvic haematoma volumes and multiplanar caliper measurements. European radiology. 2018:1-10.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burkhardt JH, Arshanskiy Y, Munson JL, Scholz FJ. Diagnosis of inguinal region hernias with axial CT: the lateral crescent sign and other key findings. Radiographics. 2011;31(2):E1-E12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Danne L and JJ De Waele. Effect of decompressive laparotomy on organ function in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2018;22(1):179.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiwari AR, Pandya JS. Study of the occurrence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients of blunt abdominal trauma and its correlation with the clinical outcome in the above patients. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2016;11(1):9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Al-Abassi AA, Al Saadi AS, Ahmed F. Is intra-bladder pressure measurement a reliable indicator for raised intra-abdominal pressure? A prospective comparative study. BMC anesthesiology. 2018;18(1):69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Young AJ, Weber W, Wolfe L, Ivatury RR, Duane TM. One elevated bladder pressure measurement may not be enough to diagnose abdominal compartment syndrome. The American Surgeon. 2013;79(2):135-9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strang SG, Van Lieshout EM, Van Waes OJ, Verhofstad MH. Prevalence and mortality of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely injured patients: A systematic review. Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2016;81(3):585-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma CenterBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of General and Trauma SurgeryBeaumont Health SystemRoyal OakUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Division of Trauma and Emergency RadiologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations