Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: MR imaging features preoperatively predict lymph node metastasis
- 95 Downloads
Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are not well established. We sought to identify the value of MR imaging features in preoperatively predicting the lymph node metastasis of pNETs.
Materials and methods
In this study, we enrolled 108 consecutive patients with pNETs between January 2009 and June 2018. MR morphologic features and quantitative data were evaluated. Predictors of LNM were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
A total of 108 patients with pNETs were finally enrolled, including 82 LNM-negative and 26 LNM-positive patients. Features significantly related to the LNM of pNETs at univariate analysis were tumor size > 2 cm (P = 0.003), Ki-67 > 5% (P = 0.002), non-enhancement pattern (P < 0.001), apparent diffusion coefficient value (P < 0.001), main pancreatic duct dilation (P < 0.001) and pancreatic atrophy (P = 0.032) and extrapancreatic tumor spread (P = 0.001), CNRs during arterial, portal and delay phase (P = 0.005, 0.047, and 0.045, respectively), and histological classification (P = 0.006). At multivariate analysis, non-enhancement pattern (P = 0.019; odds ratio, 6.652; 95% CI 1.369, 32.321) and main pancreatic duct dilation (P = 0.018; odds ratio, 6.745; 95% CI 1.379, 32.991) were independent risk factors for predicting the LNM of pNETs.
The non-enhancement characteristic and main pancreatic duct dilation appear to be linked with LNM in pNETs. These radiological predictors can be easily obtained preoperatively, and may help to avoid missing pNETs with a high risk of LNM.
KeywordsNeuroendocrine tumors Pancreas Lymph node metastases MR imaging
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was waived.
- 1.Kartalis N, Mucelli RM, Sundin A. (2015) Recent developments in imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Gastroenterol 28: 193-202Google Scholar