Hemobilia after CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: frequency, risk factors, and clinical significance
- 198 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and clinical significance of hemobilia after percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors.
Materials and methods
From January 2013 to September 2016, 195 patients received 267 sessions of CT-guided RFA for liver tumors at our institution. The CT images during and immediately after the RFA were retrospectively reviewed. The frequency of hemobilia development and clinical outcome of patients with hemobilia were studied. Risk factors were identified by comparison between the hemobilia and non-hemobilia groups using univariate and multivariate analysis. The clinical courses of patients with hemobilia were also reviewed.
Results
The frequency of CT detected hemobilia after RFA was 8.2% (22/267). The majority of the clinical courses were self-limited. Univariate analysis showed that the tumor numbers (p = 0.015), the central type puncture track (p < 0.001), the length of the puncture track (p = 0.033), and the platelet count (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with the development of hemobilia. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the central type puncture track (p < 0.024) and the platelet count (p = 0.023) were significant independent risk factors.
Conclusion
Detection of hemobilia on CT images immediately after percutaneous RFA for liver tumors was not rare. Low platelet count and central type puncture track are independent risk factors. In most cases, hemobilia presented as a minor complication with favorable prognosis.
Keywords
Hemobilia CT-guided radiofrequency ablation Hepatocellular carcinoma Liver tumors ComplicationNotes
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All author have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the IRB board of Changhua Christian Hospital.
References
- 1.Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver D (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53(3):1020–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, et al. (2010) Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 4(2):439–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tateishi R, Shiina S, Teratani T, et al. (2005) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. An analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer 103(6):1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Meloni MF, Andreano A, Laeseke PF, et al. (2009) Breast cancer liver metastases: US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation-intermediate and long-term survival rates. Radiology 253(3):861–869. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533081968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M, et al. (2016) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors affecting outcomes—a 10-year experience at a single center. Radiology 278(2):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Solbiati L, Ahmed M, Cova L, et al. (2012) Small liver colorectal metastases treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: local response rate and long-term survival with up to 10-year follow-up. Radiology 265(3):958–968. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Goto E, Tateishi R, Shiina S, et al. (2010) Hemorrhagic complications of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for liver tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 44(5):374–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181b7ed76 Google Scholar
- 8.Rhim H, Lim HK, Kim YS, Choi D, Lee KT (2007) Hemobilia after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 32(6):719–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9158-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Akahane M, Koga H, Kato N, et al. (2005) Complications of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepato-cellular carcinoma: imaging spectrum and management. Radiographics 25(Suppl 1):S57–S68. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.25si055505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Curley SA, Marra P, Beaty K, et al. (2004) Early and late complications after radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver tumors in 608 patients. Ann Surg 239(4):450–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Takaki H, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, et al. (2013) Frequency of and risk factors for complications after liver radiofrequency ablation under CT fluoroscopic guidance in 1500 sessions: single-center experience. AJR 200(3):658–664. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bertot LC, Sato M, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, Koike K (2011) Mortality and complication rates of percutaneous ablative techniques for the treatment of liver tumors: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 21(12):2584–2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2222-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kim SH, Lim HK, Choi D, et al. (2004) Changes in bile ducts after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and clinical significance. AJR 183(6):1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Chang IS, Rhim H, Kim SH, et al. (2010) Biloma formation after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence, imaging features, and clinical significance. AJR 195(5):1131–1136. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Feng W, Yue D, ZaiMing L, et al. (2016) Iatrogenic hemobilia: imaging features and management with transcatheter arterial embolization in 30 patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 22(4):371–377. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2016.15295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, et al. (2005) Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 234(3):961–967. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2343040350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Murugesan SD, Sathyanesan J, Lakshmanan A, et al. (2014) Massive hemobilia: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. World J Surg 38(7):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2435-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lee LH, Hwang JI, Cheng YC, et al. (2017) Comparable outcomes of ultrasound versus computed tomography in the guidance of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0169655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, et al. (2014) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria—a 10-year update. Radiology 273(1):241–260. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB, et al. (2017) Proposal of a new adverse event classification by the society of interventional radiology standards of practice committee. JVIR 28(10):1432–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Enne M, Pacheco-Moreira LF, Cerqueira A, et al. (2004) Fatal hemobilia after radiofrequency thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 135(4):460–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar