Association of qualitative and quantitative imaging features on multiphasic multidetector CT with tumor grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
- 136 Downloads
The purpose of the study was to determine if enhancement features and qualitative imaging features on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) were associated with tumor grade in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
In this retrospective, IRB approved, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study with waiver of informed consent, 127 consecutive patients with 89 low grade (LG) and 43 high grade (HG) ccRCCs underwent preoperative four-phase MDCT in unenhanced (UN), corticomedullary (CM), nephrographic (NP), and excretory (EX) phases. Previously published quantitative (absolute peak lesion enhancement, absolute peak lesion enhancement relative to normal enhancing renal cortex, 3D whole lesion enhancement and the wash-in/wash-out of enhancement within the 3D whole lesion ROI) and qualitative (enhancement pattern; presence of necrosis; pattern of; tumor margin; tumor–parenchymal interface, tumor–parenchymal interaction; intratumoral vascularity; collecting system infiltration; renal vein invasion; and calcification) assessments were obtained for each lesion independently by two fellowship-trained genitourinary radiologists. Comparisons between variables included χ2, ANOVA, and student t test. p values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant. Inter-reader agreement was obtained with the Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1) and standard error (SE) was reported.
No significant differences were observed between the LG and HG ccRCC cohorts with respect to absolute peak lesion enhancement and relative lesion enhancement ratio. There was a significant inverse correlation between low and high grade ccRCC and tumor enhancement the NP (71 HU vs. 54 HU, p < 0.001) and EX (52 HU vs. 39 HU, p < 0.001) phases using the 3D whole lesion ROI method. The percent wash-in of 3D enhancement from the UN to the CM phase was also significantly different between LG and HG ccRCCs (352% vs. 255%, p = 0.003). HG lesions showed significantly more calcification, necrosis, collecting system infiltration and ill-defined tumor margins (p < 0.05). Overall agreement between the two readers had a mean AC1 of 0.8172 (SE 0.0235).
Quantitatively, high grade ccRCC had significantly lower whole lesion enhancement in the NP and EX phases on MDCT. Qualitatively, high grade ccRCC were significantly more likely to be associated with calcifications, necrosis, collecting system infiltration, and an ill-defined tumor margin.
KeywordsClear cell renal cell carcinoma Fuhrman nuclear grade Renal computed tomography Neoplasm grading Kidney Tumor heterogenity
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflicts of interest.
This retrospective, single-center, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study was approved by the Institutional Review board and a waiver of informed consent was obtained.
- 18.Reiner C, Roessle M, Thiesler T, et al. (2013) Computed tomography perfusion imaging of renal cell carcinoma. Invest Radiol 48:183–191Google Scholar
- 20.Villalobos-Gollas M, Aguilar-Davidov B, Culebro-Garcia C, et al. (2012) Pathological implications of areas of lower enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography in renal cell carcinoma: additional information for selecting candidates for surveillance protocols. Int Urol Nephrol 44:1369–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Coy H, Young JR, Douek M, et al. (2017) Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Radiol 42(7):1919–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kopp RP, Aganovic L, Palazzi KL, et al. (2013) Differentiation of clear from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using CT washout formula. Can J Urol 20(3):6790–6797Google Scholar