Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 3147–3156 | Cite as

Utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum abnormality

  • Bhagya Sannananja
  • Anna Ellermeier
  • Daniel S. Hippe
  • Thomas C. WinterIII
  • Stella K. Kang
  • Susanna I. Lee
  • Mark R. Kilgore
  • Manjiri K. Dighe
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of added DWI sequences as an adjunct to traditional MR imaging in the evaluation of abnormal placentation in patients with suspicion for placenta accreta spectrum abnormality or morbidly adherent placenta (MAP).

Materials and methods

The study was approved by local ethics committee. The subjects included pregnant women with prenatal MRI performed between July 2013 to July 2015. All imaging was performed on a Philips 1.5T MR scanner using pelvic phased-array coil. Only T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) series were compiled for review. Two randomized imaging sets were created: set 1 included T2-weighted series only (T2W); set 2 included T2W with DWI series together (T2W + DWI). Three radiologists, blinded to history and pathology, reviewed the imaging, with 2 weeks of time between the two image sets. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for MAP were calculated and compared between T2W only and T2W + DWI reads. Associations between imaging findings and invasion on pathology were tested using the Chi-squared test. Confidence scores, inter-reader agreement, and systematic differences were documented.

Results

A total of 17 pregnant women were included in the study. 8 cases were pathologically diagnosed with MAP. There were no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy between T2W and T2W + DWI in the diagnosis of MAP in terms of overall accuracy (62.7% for T2W vs. 68.6% for T2W + DWI, p = 0.68), sensitivity (70.8% for T2W vs. 95.8% for T2W + DWI, p = 0.12), and specificity (55.6% for T2W vs. 44.4% for T2W + DWI, p = 0.49). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic confidence between the review of T2W images alone and the T2W + DWI review (mean 7.3 ± 1.8 for T2W vs. 7.5 ± 1.8 for T2W + DWI, p = 0.37).

Conclusion

With the current imaging technique, addition of DWI sequence to the traditional T2W images cannot be shown to significantly increase the accuracy or reader confidence for diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum abnormality. However, DWI does improve identification of abnormalities in the placental–myometrial interface.

Keywords

Diffusion-weighted MR DWI Placenta accreta spectrum abnormality Morbidly adherent placenta MAP 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Retrospective study, hence no informed consents were obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    Mazouni C, Gorincour G, Juhan V, Bretelle F (2007) Placenta accreta: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis. Placenta 28:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silver RM (2004) The MFMU cesarean section registry: maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:S17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP (1985) Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 66:89–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derman AY, Nikac V, Haberman S, et al. (2011) MRI of placenta accreta: a new imaging perspective. Am J Roent 197(6):1514–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shweel MAG, El Ameen NF, Ibrahiem MA, Kotib A (2012) Placenta accreta in women with prior uterine surgery: diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasonography and MRI. Egypt J Rad NM 43(3):473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Florence B, Blandine C, Chafika M, et al. (2007) Management of placenta accreta: morbidity and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 133:34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrew DH, Thomas RM (2011) Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management. Clin Perinatol 38:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1458–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konijeti R, Rajfer J, Askari A (2009) Placenta percreta and the urologist. Rev Urol 11:173–176PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR (2008) Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR Imaging Findings. Radiographics 28(7):1905–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morita S, Ueno E, Fujimura M, et al. (2009) Feasibility of diffusion-weighted MRI for defining placental invasion. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(3):666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao Sujuan, Liu Bin, Cao Yanmin (2016) The comparison of MRI and Ultrasound in prenatal identification of invasive placentation: a meta-analysis based on 20 parallel control studies. Int J Clin Exp Med 9(6):9932–9942Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Derman Anna Y, Nikac Violeta, Haberman Shoshana, et al. (2011) MRI of placenta accreta. AJR 197:1514–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, Schwebach JR, Budorick NE (2007) The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of suspected placental invasion. Magn Reson Imaging 25:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, et al. (2014) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS One 9:e94866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, et al. (1997) MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. AM J Roentgenol 168:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim JA, Narra VR (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging with true fast imaging with steady-state precession and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences in cases of suspected placenta accreta. Acta Radiol 45:692–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Einerson BD, Rodriguez C, Kennedy AM, Woodward PJ, Silver RM (2017) Accuracy and inter-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaing findings for the prediction of morbidly adherent placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 216(1):S164–S165Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Kennedy AM, et al. (2014) Interobserver variability of sonography for prediction of placenta accreta. J Ultrasound Med 33:2153–2158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Washington Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.RA-MINW, P.S.TacomaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyNYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Department of PathologyUniversity of Washington Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations