Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 2955–2962 | Cite as

Three-dimensional CT enterography versus barium follow-through examination in measurement of remnant small intestinal length in short bowel syndrome patients

  • Wei Cheng
  • Shaoyi Zhang
  • Jian Wang
  • Changsheng Zhou
  • Yousheng Li
  • Jieshou Li
Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of remnant small intestinal length measured by barium follow-through (BaFT) examination and three-dimensional CT enterography (CTe).

Materials and methods

Twenty-nine consecutive short bowel syndrome patients (SBS) who underwent BaFT, CTe, and prior surgical measurements of small intestine were included. Measurements of total remnant small intestinal length on BaFT and CTe were compared to surgical measurements using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Bland–Altman plots, and paired t test.

Results

The average remnant intestinal length was 73.1 ± 37.2 cm according to surgical measurement. There was a significant positive correlation between CTe and surgical measurement (r2 = 0.99; p < 0.0001), and a relatively weaker correlation between BaFT and surgical measurement (r2 = 0.71; p < 0.001). Compared with surgical measurement, the percentage differences of CTe and BaFT were 5.71 ± 6.71% and 27.14 ± 18.41% (mean ± SD), respectively. Furthermore, Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement between CTe and surgical measurement, whereas relatively poor agreement between BaFT and surgical measurement. However, significant difference was found among the three measurement methods by paired t test (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Assessment of remnant small intestinal length by CTe is accurate and acceptable for clinical application, whereas BaFT is less accurate although BaFT is more convenient and cheaper for clinical application. And CTe can provide a cost-effective and noninvasive determination of remnant small intestinal length in planning surgical and nutritional intervention in SBS patients.

Keywords

Small intestinal length CT enterography Barium follow-through examination Short bowel syndrome 

Abbreviation

SBS

Short bowel syndrome

BaFT

Barium follow-through

CTe

CT enterography

MDCT

Multidetector CT

STEP

Serial transverse enteroplasty procedure

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 81270945).

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 81270945).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of Jinling Hospital. All the participants provided written informed consent.

Informed consent

All the participants provided written informed consent.

Supplementary material

261_2018_1597_MOESM1_ESM.tif (973 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 972 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pironi L, Hébuterne X, Van Gossum A, et al. (2006) Candidates for intestinal transplantation: a multicenter survey in Europe. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1633–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00710.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson JS, Rochling FA, Weseman RA, Mercer DF (2012) Current management of short bowel syndrome. Curr Prob Surg 49(2):52–115.  https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2011.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson JS, Langnas AN, Pinch LW, et al. (1995) Surgical approach to short-bowel syndrome. Experience in a population of 160 patients. Ann Surg 222(4):600–605.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199522240-00016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson JS, Weseman RA, Rochling FA, et al. (2012) Preresection obesity increases the risk of hepatobiliary complications in short bowel syndrome. Nutrients 4(10):1358–1366.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4101358 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nordgaard I, Hansen BS, Mortensen PB (1994) Colon as a digestive organ in patients with short bowel. Lancet 343(8894):373–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91220-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pakarinen MP, Pakkasjärvi N, Merras-Salmio L, Koivusalo A, Rintala R (2015) Intestinal rehabilitation of infantile onset very short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 50(2):289–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Messing B, Crenn P, Beau P, et al. (1999) Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 117(5):1043–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70388-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carbonnel F, Cosnes J, Chevret S, et al. (1996) The role of anatomic factors in nutritional autonomy after extensive small bowel resection. JPEN 20(4):275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607196020004275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mccullagh M, Garvie DC, Dykes EH (1994) A new method of intestinal salvage for severe small bowel ischemia. J Pediatr Surg 29(9):1231–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90809-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeppesen PB, Pertkiewicz M, Messing B, et al. (2012) Teduglutide reduces need for parenteral support among patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure. Gastroenterology 143(6):1473–1481.e3.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wasa M, Takagi Y, Sando K, Harada T, Okada A (1999) Long-term outcome of short bowel syndrome in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN 23(5 sSuppl):S110–S112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014860719902300527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Keefe SJ, Buchman AL, Fishbein TM, et al. (2006) Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: consensus definitions and overview. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol H 4(1):6–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Byrne TA, Wilmore DW, Iyer K, et al. (2005) Growth hormone, glutamine, and an optimal diet reduces parenteral nutrition in patients with short bowel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg 242(5):655–661.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000186479.53295.14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dodge ME, Bertolo RF, Brunton JA (2012) Enteral feeding induces early intestinal adaptation in a parenterally fed neonatal piglet model of short bowel syndrome. J JPENJPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36(2):205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607111417447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dore M, Junco PT, Andres AM, Sánchez-Galán A, Amesty MV, Ramos E, Prieto G, Hernandez F, Santamaria ML (2015) Surgical rehabilitation techniques in children with poor prognosis short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 26: official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery[et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie 26(1):112.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1567805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sudan D, Thompson J, Botha J, Grant W, Antonson D, Raynor S, Langnas A (2007) Comparison of intestinal lengthening procedures for patients with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 246(4):593–601; discussion 601–604  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155aa0c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlussel AT, Steele SR, Alavi K (2016) Current challenges in the surgical management of Crohn's disease: a systematic review. Am J Surg 212(2):345–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teitelbaum EN, Vaziri K, Zettervall S, Amdur RL, Orkin BA (2013) Intraoperative small bowel length measurements and analysis of demographic predictors of increased length. Clin Anat 26(7):827–832.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22238 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fanucci A, Cerro P, Fraracci L, Ietto F (1984) Small bowel length measured by radiography. Gastrointestinal Radiology 9(4):349–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887866 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nightingale JM, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE (1991) Length of residual small bowel after partial resection: correlation between radiographic and surgical measurements. Gastrointestinal Radiology 16(4):305–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887374 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shatari T, Clark MA, Lee JR, Keighley MRB (2004) Reliability of radiographic measurement of small intestinal length. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol Gt Br Irel 6(5):327–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00603.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinha R, Trivedi D, Murphy PD, Fallis S (2014) Small-intestinal length measurement on MR enterography: comparison with in vivo surgical measurement. Am J Roentgenol 203(3):W274–W279.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fanucci A, Cerro P, Fanucci E (1988) Normal small-bowel measurements by enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 23(5):574–576.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528809093914 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lodwick D, Dienhart M, Ambeba E, et al. (2016) Accuracy of radiographic estimation of small bowel dimensions in pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 51(6):953–956.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.059 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hukkinen M, Kivisaari R, Merras-Salmio L, Koivusalo A, Pakarinen MP (2017) Small bowel dilatation predicts prolonged parenteral nutrition and decreased survival in pediatric short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 266:369–375.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001893 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sokhandon F, Al-Katib S, Bahoura L, et al. (2017) Multidetector CT enterography of focal small bowel lesions: a radiological-pathological correlation. Abdom Radiol 42:1319–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1015-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vasconcelos RN, Dolan SG, Barlow JM, et al. (2017) Impact of CT enterography on the diagnosis of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Abdom Radiol 42:1365–1373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1033-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pironi L, Arends J, Bozzetti F, Cuerda C, Gillanders L, Jeppesen PB, Joly F, Kelly D, Lal S, Staun M, Szczepanek K, Van Gossum A, Wanten G, Schneider SM, Home Artificial Nutrition & Chronic Intestinal Failure Special Interest Group of ESPEN (2016) ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin Nutr 35(2):247–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shatari T, Clark MMA, Lee JJR, Keighley MMR (2004) Reliability of radiographic measurement of small intestinal length. Colorectal Dis 6(5):327–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00603.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, et al. (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14(5):365–376.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Cheng
    • 1
  • Shaoyi Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jian Wang
    • 1
  • Changsheng Zhou
    • 3
  • Yousheng Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jieshou Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant CenterJinling Hospital, Medicine School of Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryShanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Medical ImagingJinling Hospital, Medicine School of Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations