Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1558–1566 | Cite as

Comparison of diagnostic performance between 1 millisievert CT enterography and half-standard dose CT enterography for evaluating active inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease

  • Jung Hee Son
  • Seung Ho Kim
  • Een Young Cho
  • Kyeong Hwa Ryu
Article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of CT enterography (CTE) images obtained at 1 millisievert (mSv) and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with those of half-dose CTE images for the evaluation of active inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients (mean age 29 years; range 15–59 years) with Crohn’s disease underwent CTE which comprised a standard-dose scan at the enteric phase (45 s), a half-dose scan with ASIR at the portal venous phase (70 s), and 1 mSv scans with FBP and ASIR at the delayed phase (90 s) under a fixed 120 kVp and variable mAs. Two blinded readers independently recorded confidence scores for active inflammation in the ileum and terminal ileum, respectively. The diagnostic performance of each image set was compared by pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. The established image findings on standard-dose scan and ileocolonoscopy served as the reference standard.

Results

A total of 92 bowel segments were analyzed. For reader 1, the diagnostic performance was increased from 1 mSv CT with FBP and 1 mSv CT with ASIR to half-dose scan with ASIR (AUC, 0.759, 0.794, and 0.845; P = 0.1429, P = 0.0107, respectively). For reader 2, there was no significant difference among the three image sets (AUC, 0.848, 0.865, and 0.845; P > 0.05, respectively).

Conclusions

The diagnostic performance of 1 mSv CTE may be comparable to that of half-dose CTE.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease CT enterography Iterative reconstruction Half-dose 1 millisievert Radiation reduction 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, et al. (2011) Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol 196:W743–W752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karlinger K, Gyorke T, Mako E, et al. (2000) The epidemiology and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol 35:154–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loftus EV Jr (2004) Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 126:1504–1517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kambadakone AR, Prakash P, Hahn PF, et al. (2010) Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn’s disease: impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol 195:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ippolito D, Lombardi S, Trattenero C, et al. (2016) CT enterography: diagnostic value of 4th generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in low dose studies in comparison with standard dose protocol for follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 85:268–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. (2011) A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. Am J Roentgenol 197:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park MJ, Lim JS (2013) Computed tomography enterography for evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Endosc 46:327–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, et al. (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1240–1248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Neill SB, McLaughlin PD, Crush L, et al. (2013) A prospective feasibility study of sub-millisievert abdominopelvic CT using iterative reconstruction in Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 23:2503–2512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy KP, Crush L, Twomey M, et al. (2015) Model-based iterative reconstruction in CT enterography. Am J Roentgenol 205:1173–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gandhi NS, Baker ME, Goenka AH, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of CT enterography for active inflammatory terminal ileal Crohn disease: comparison of full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with FBP and half-dose images with SAFIRE. Radiology 280:436–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor SA, Avni F, Cronin CG, et al. (2017) The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol 27:2570–2582. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4615-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ICRP (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:2–4Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shim HS, Kim SH, Yoon JH, et al. (2014) Postoperative low-dose follow-up computed tomography for patients with stomach cancer: optimal blending ratio of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:376–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Booya F, Fletcher JG, Huprich JE, et al. (2006) Active Crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography. Radiology 241:787–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, et al. (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 26:641–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, et al. (2006) Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 55:1561–1567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Craig O, O’Neill S, O’Neill F, et al. (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography using lower doses of radiation for patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:886–892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim C, Park SH, Yang SK, et al. (2016) Endoscopic complete remission of Crohn disease after anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy: CT enterographic findings and their clinical implications. Am J Roentgenol 206:1208–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jung Hee Son
    • 1
  • Seung Ho Kim
    • 1
  • Een Young Cho
    • 2
  • Kyeong Hwa Ryu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyInje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik HospitalBusanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Health Promotion CenterInje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik HospitalBusanRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyGyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon HospitalChangwonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations