Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 1094–1100 | Cite as

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced CT combined with 18-FDG PET in patients selected for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

  • Antonio Sommariva
  • Laura Evangelista
  • Giovanna Pintacuda
  • Anna Rita Cervino
  • Gaetano Ramondo
  • Carlo Riccardo Rossi
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Aim of the study is to assess the reliability and correlation with surgical peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of combined PET/CT and ceCT scans (PET/ceCT) performed in a session in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis candidates for cytoreductive surgery (CS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data collected from 27 patients with different types of peritoneal carcinomatosis candidates to CS + HIPEC who underwent FDG PET/ceCT in a single session. Two nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists independently and blindly evaluated PET/CT and ceCT imaging, respectively. In the case of discordance, the consensus was reached by a discussion between the specialists. Moreover, the combined images were evaluated by all the specialists in consensus. The PCIs obtained from surgical look, PET/CT, ceCT, and PET/ceCT were compared with each other. The coefficients of correlation (r) were calculated. The study was conducted after approval of local ethics committee.

Results

Surgical PCI was available in 21 patients. The coefficient of correlation between PCI of PET/CT and surgery was 0.528, while it resulted higher between PET/ceCT and surgery (r = 0.878), very similar to ceCT and surgery (r = 0.876). The r coefficient between surgical PCI and PET/CT was higher in patients with a non-mucinous cancer (n = 12) than the counterpart (0.601 vs. 0.303) and the addition of ceCT significantly increases the correlation (r = 0.863), which is anyway similar to ceCT alone (r = 0.856).

Conclusions

PET/ceCT as single examination is more accurate than PET/CT but not than ceCT alone for the definition of PCI in a selected group of patients candidates to CS + HIPEC.

Keywords

Peritoneal carcinomatosis PET CT HIPEC 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was performed after the evaluation and approval of local Ethics committee the 18th January 2016 (IOV-CAR-1-2015 Study).

References

  1. 1.
    Sommariva A, Pilati P, Rossi CR (2012) Cyto-reductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancies: current treatment and results. Cancer Treat Rev 38:258–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sugarbaker PH (2006) New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome? Lancet Oncol 7:69–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan TD, Welch L, Black D, Sugarbaker PH (2007) A systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignancy peritoneal mesothelioma. Ann Oncol 18:827–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao C, Yan TD, Black D, Morris DL (2009) A systematic review and meta-analysis of cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Ann Surg Oncol 16(8):2152–2165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chua TC, Robertson G, Liauw W, et al. (2009) Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of current results. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135:1637–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rossi CR, Casali P, Kusamura S, Baratti D, Deraco M (2008) The consensus statement on the locoregional treatment of abdominal sarcomatosis. J Surg Oncol 98:291–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Portilla AG, Shigeki K, Dario B, Marcello D (2008) The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. J Surg Oncol 98:228–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH (1993) Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 72(5):1631–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Bree E, Koops W, Kröger R, et al. (2004) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin: correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement. J Surg Oncol 86:64–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pfannenberg C, Königsrainer I, Aschoff P, et al. (2009) (18)F-FDG-PET/CT to select patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1295–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faron M, Macovei R, Goéré D, et al. (2016) Linear relationship of peritoneal cancer index and survival in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:114–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yan TD, Haveric N, Carmignani CP, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (2005) Abdominal computed tomography scans in the selection of patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma for comprehensive treatment with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer 103:839–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dowdy SC, Mullany SA, Brandt KR, Huppert BJ, Cliby WA (2004) The utility of computed tomography scans in predicting suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 101:346–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL (2009) Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 16:327–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klumpp B, Aschoff P, Schwenzer N, et al. (2013) Correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis and clinical outcome after peritonectomy and HIPEC after 3 years of follow-up: preliminary results. Cancer Imaging 13:540–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sommariva A, Zagonel V, Rossi CR (2012) The role of laparoscopy in peritoneal surface malignancies selected for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 19:3737–3744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Passot G, Glehen O, Pellet O, et al. (2010) Pseudomyxoma peritonei: role of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative evaluation of pathological grade and potential for complete cytoreduction. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:315–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brendle C, Schwenzer NF, Rempp H, et al. (2016) Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pasqual EM, Bertozzi S, Bacchetti S, et al. (2014) Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery. Anticancer Res 34:2363–2368PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Sommariva
    • 1
  • Laura Evangelista
    • 2
  • Giovanna Pintacuda
    • 3
  • Anna Rita Cervino
    • 2
  • Gaetano Ramondo
    • 3
  • Carlo Riccardo Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Surgical Oncology UnitVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCSPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging UnitVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCSPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Radiology Oncology UnitVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCSPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations