Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 2364–2371 | Cite as

The target sign in colorectal liver metastases: an atypical Gd-EOB-DTPA “uptake” on the hepatobiliary phase of MR imaging

  • Vincenza Granata
  • Orlando Catalano
  • Roberta Fusco
  • Fabiana Tatangelo
  • Daniela Rega
  • Guglielmo Nasti
  • Antonio Avallone
  • Mauro Piccirillo
  • Francesco Izzo
  • Antonella Petrillo
Article

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the MRI findings in colorectal cancer liver metastases using gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), with special emphasis on the target feature seen on the hepatobiliary phase.

Material and methods

The medical records of 45 colorectal cancer patients with an overall number of 150 liver metastases were reviewed. All patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI before any kind of treatment. We retrospectively evaluated, for each lesion, the signal intensity on the T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted images. Additionally, the enhancement pattern during the arterial-, portal-, equilibrium-, and hepatobiliary-phase was assessed. Fourteen lesions had a pathological correlation.

Results

Lesions size was 5–40 mm (mean 15 mm). All metastases were hypointense on T1-w imaging. Ninety-nine lesions (66%) had a central area of very high signal intensity on T2-w imaging. Fifty-one metastases (34%) were hyperintense on the T2-w images. In DWI, all lesions had a restricted diffusion. The mean ADC value was 1.31 × 10−3 mm2/s (range 1.10–1.45 × 10−3 mm2/s). During the arterial-phase imaging, 61 lesions (41%) showed a rim enhancement, while 89 lesions (59%) appeared as hypointense. All lesions had low signal intensity in the portal and equilibrium phase. Thirty-nine percent of the lesions also showed an enhancing rim on the portal-phase images. During the hepatobiliary phase, 80 lesions (53.3%) were hypointense, while 70 lesions (46.7%) had a target appearance.

Conclusion

A number of metastases show an atypical contrast medium uptake during the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, consisting in a target appearance.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Liver metastasis Magnetic resonance imaging Gadoxetic acid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Alessandra Trocino, librarian at the National Cancer Institute of Naples, Italy.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to be disclosed.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ding Y, Rao S-X, Meng T, et al. (2014) Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI. Clin Imaging 38:273–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, et al. (2006) Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 94:982–999PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zech CJ, Bartolozzi C, Bioulac-Sage P, et al. (2013) Consensus report of the Fifth International Forum for Liver MRI. AJR 201:97–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guenette JP, Dupuy DE (2010) Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal hepatic metastases. J Surg Oncol 102:978–987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Do RK, Rusinek H, Taouli B (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:339–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Low RN (2007) Abdominal MRI advances in the detection of liver tumours and characterisation. Lancet Oncol 8:525–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larissa Braga DA, Azzazi ME, Semelka RC (2010) Abdominal-pelvic MRI, 3rd edn. Hoboken: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milot L, Guindi M, Gallinger S, et al. (2010) MR imaging correlates of intratumoral tissue types within colorectal liver metastases: a high-spatial-resolution fresh ex vivo radiologic-pathologic correlation study. Radiology 254:747–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macera A, Lario C, Petracchini M, et al. (2013) Staging of colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI sequences increases sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol 23:739–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koh DM, Collins DJ, Wallace T, Chau I, Riddell AM (2012) Combining diffusion-weighted MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Radiol 85:980–989PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donati OF, Fischer MA, Chuck N, et al. (2013) Accuracy and confidence of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Eur J Radiol 82:822–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Terayama N, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al. (2002) Peritumoral rim enhancement of liver metastasis: hemodynamics observed on single-level dynamic CT during hepatic arteriography and histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:975–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nino-Murcia M, Olcott EW, Jeffrey RB Jr, et al. (2000) Focal liver lesions: pattern-based classification scheme for enhancement at arterial phase CT. Radiology 215:746–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braga L, Semelka RC, Pietrobon R, et al. (2004) Does hypervascularity of liver metastases as detected on MRI predict disease progression in breast cancer patients? AJR 182:1207–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danet IM, Semelka RC, Leonardou P, et al. (2003) Spectrum of MRI appearances of untreated metastases of the liver. AJR 181:809–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ha S, Lee CH, Kim BH, et al. (2012) Paradoxical uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatobiliary phase in the evaluation of hepatic metastasis from breast cancer: is the “target sign” a common finding? Magn Reson Imaging 30:1083–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim A, Lee CH, Kim BH, et al. (2012) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T MRI for the evaluation of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: metastasis is not always seen as a “defect” on the hepatobiliary phase. Eur J Radiol 81:3998–4004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choi JY, Choi JS, Kim MJ, et al. (2010) Detection of hepatic hypovascular metastases: 3D gradient echo MRI using a hepatobiliary contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:571–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB, Merkle EM (2010) Gadoxetate disodium enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR 195:13–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS (2004) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 14:5–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balci NC, Semelka RC (2005) Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am 43:887–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Beers BE, Pastor CM, Hussain HK (2012) Primovist, eovist: what to expect? J Hepatol 57:421–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, et al. (1998) Delayed MR imaging of the liver: correlation of delayed enhancement of hepatic tumors and pathologic appearance. Abdom Imaging 23:309–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenza Granata
    • 1
  • Orlando Catalano
    • 1
  • Roberta Fusco
    • 1
  • Fabiana Tatangelo
    • 2
  • Daniela Rega
    • 3
  • Guglielmo Nasti
    • 4
  • Antonio Avallone
    • 5
  • Mauro Piccirillo
    • 6
  • Francesco Izzo
    • 6
  • Antonella Petrillo
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of RadiologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of PathologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Colorectal Surgical OncologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly
  4. 4.Department of Colorectal Medical OncologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly
  5. 5.Department of Abdominal Medical OncologyIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly
  6. 6.Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G.PascaleNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations