Effect of radiologists’ experience with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm on detection of hypervascular liver lesions and perception of image quality
- 194 Downloads
To prospectively evaluate whether clinical experience with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR) has an effect on radiologists’ diagnostic performance and confidence for the diagnosis of hypervascular liver tumors, as well as on their subjective perception of image quality.
Materials and methods
Forty patients, having 65 hypervascular liver tumors, underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT during the hepatic arterial phase. Image datasets were reconstructed with filtered backprojection algorithm and ASiR (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% blending). During two reading sessions, performed before and after a three-year period of clinical experience with ASiR, three readers assessed datasets for lesion detection, likelihood of malignancy, and image quality.
For all reconstruction algorithms, there was no significant change in readers’ diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for the detection of liver lesions, between the two reading sessions. However, a 60% ASiR dataset yielded a significant improvement in specificity, lesion conspicuity, and confidence for lesion likelihood of malignancy during the second reading session (P < 0.0001). The 60% ASiR dataset resulted in significant improvement in readers’ perception of image quality during the second reading session (P < 0.0001).
Clinical experience using an ASiR algorithm may improve radiologists’ diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of hypervascular liver tumors, as well as their perception of image quality.
KeywordsAdaptive statistical iterative reconstruction Filtered backprojection Hypervascular liver tumors Diagnostic accuracy Image quality
- 5.Fletcher JG, Grant KL, Fidler JL, et al. (2012) Validation of dual-source single-tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction: phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:560–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ghetti C, Palleri F, Serreli G, Ortenzia O, Ruffini L (2013) Physical characterization of a new CT iterative reconstruction method operating in sinogram space. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14:43–47Google Scholar
- 12.Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm–initial clinical experience. Radiology 254:145–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Miéville FA, Ayestaran P, Argaud C, et al. (2010) Potential benefit of the CT adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method for pediatric cardiac diagnosis. Procedings of SPIE, 76222D1-D11Google Scholar
- 18.Couinaud C (1957) Le foie: etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris: Masson et CieGoogle Scholar
- 21.Medical imaging: the assessment of image quality (report no. 54) (1996) International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and MeasurementsGoogle Scholar
- 22.Jessen K, Panzer W, Shrimpton P, et al. (2000) EUR 16262: European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
- 27.Barnes E (2010) Better images are next frontier for CT iterative recon. AuntMinnie.com. Retrieved September 16, 2010 from http://www.auntminnie.com/print/print.asp?sec=sup&sub=cto&pag=dis&ItemId=91818&printpage=true
- 28.Barnes E (2010) MBIR aims to outshine ASIR for sharpness, CT dose reduction. AuntMinnie.com. Retrieved September 17, 2010 from: http://www.auntminnie.com/print/print.asp?sec=sup&sub=cto&pag=dis&ItemId=90625&printpage=true