Advertisement

Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 125–136 | Cite as

The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines

  • Atif ZaheerEmail author
  • Vikesh K. Singh
  • Reema O. Qureshi
  • Elliot K. Fishman
Article

Abstract

Imaging of acute pancreatitis requires not only an understanding of the disease subtypes and the myriad of associated complications but also familiarity with the appropriate radiologic nomenclature as defined by the Atlanta symposium in 1992 and, more recently, by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group in 2008. The accurate description of the radiological findings plays a critical role in the evaluation and management of patients with acute pancreatitis, particularly those with severe disease. There have been increasing efforts to develop uniformity in the use of terminology used to define the radiologic findings in acute pancreatitis, in particular, the terminology for fluid collections, a common area of inconsistency and confusion. Terms such as “acute peripancreatic fluid collections,” “acute post- necrotic fluid collections,” “pseudocyst,” and “walled-off pancreatic necrosis” are now recommended as they describe the evolution of fluid collections in patients with both interstitial and necrotizing pancreatitis and nonspecific terms such as “pancreatic abscess” and “phlegmon” are being abandoned. In this review we illustrate, with case examples, the standardized terminology used in the radiological and clinical description of acute pancreatitis, its severity, and complications with an emphasis on the role of ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Different management options of the associated complications are also discussed. The use of standardized terminology will hopefully improve the communication between radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons to facilitate treatment planning and will lead to enhanced outcomes for patients with acute pancreatitis as well as create uniformity for enrollment into research studies.

Keywords

Pancreas Acute pancreatitis Imaging Complications Necrosis Revised Atlanta classification 

References

  1. 1.
    Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandler RS, et al. (2002) The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 122(5):1500–1511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fagenholz PJ, et al. (2007) Direct medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas 35(4):302–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mofidi R, et al. (2006) Association between early systemic inflammatory response, severity of multiorgan dysfunction and death in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 93(6):738–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Werner J, et al. (2005) Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 54(3):426–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagar AB, Gorelick F (2005) Epidemiology and pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. In: Forsmark CE (ed) Pancreatitis and its complications. Totowa: Humana, pp 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isenmann R, Rau B, Beger HG (1999) Bacterial infection and extent of necrosis are determinants of organ failure in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 86(8):1020–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh VK, et al. (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(12):1098–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bollen TL, et al. (2008) The Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg 95(1):6–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group (2008) Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. http://www.pancreasclub.com/resources/AtlantaClassification.pdf
  12. 12.
    Bradley EL, Gonzalez AC, Clements JL Jr (1976) Acute pancreatic pseudocysts: incidence and implications. Ann Surg 184(6):734–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson CD (1993) Timing of intervention in acute pancreatitis. Postgrad Med J 69(813):509–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siegelman SS, et al. (1980) CT of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134(6):1121–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193(2):297–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baillie J (2004) Pancreatic pseudocysts (part I). Gastrointest Endosc 59(7):873–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maher MM, et al. (2004) Acute pancreatitis: the role of imaging and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27(3):208–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beebe DS, et al. (1984) Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159(6):562–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Malley VP, Cannon JP, Postier RG (1985) Pancreatic pseudocysts: cause, therapy, and results. Am J Surg 150(6):680–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yeo CJ, et al. (1990) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170(5):411–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vitas GJ, Sarr MG (1992) Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 111(2):123–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stephan RN, Bradley EL 3rd (1996) Pancreatic infections. Gastroenterologist 4(3):163–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Behrns KE, Ben-David K (2008) Surgical therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Gastrointest Surg 12(12):2231–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brugge WR (2004) Approaches to the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 20(5):488–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nealon WH, Walser E (2002) Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg 235(6):751–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nealon WH, Walser E (2005) Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas. Ann Surg 241(6):948–957 (discussion 957–60)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanna WA (1960) Rupture of pancreatic cysts. Report of a case and review of the literature. Br J Surg 47:495–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    White AF, Baum S, Buranasiri S (1976) Aneurysms secondary to pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127(3):393–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adams DB, Zellner JL, Anderson MC (1993) Arterial hemorrhage complicating pancreatic pseudocysts: role of angiography. J Surg Res 54(2):150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    De Sanctis JT, et al. (1997) Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II. Clin Radiol 52(11):842–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beger HG, et al. (1985) Results of surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Surg 9(6):972–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moulton JS (1991) The radiologic assessment of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Pancreas 6(Suppl 1):S13–S22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lankisch PG, Haseloff M, Becher R (1994) No parallel between the biochemical course of acute pancreatitis and morphologic findings. Pancreas 9(2):240–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buter A, et al. (2002) Dynamic nature of early organ dysfunction determines outcome in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 89(3):298–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tenner S, et al. (1997) Relationship of necrosis to organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 113(3):899–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sakorafas GH, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG (1999) Extrapancreatic necrotizing pancreatitis with viable pancreas: a previously under-appreciated entity. J Am Coll Surg 188(6):643–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bruennler T, et al. (2009) Outcome in a large unselected series of patients with acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(91–92):871–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lankisch PG, Struckmann K, Lehnick D (1999) Presence and extent of extrapancreatic fluid collections are indicators of severe acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 26(3):131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garg PK, et al. (2005) Association of extent and infection of pancreatic necrosis with organ failure and death in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(2):159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mole DJ, et al. (2009) Discrepancy between the extent of pancreatic necrosis and multiple organ failure score in severe acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 33(11):2427–2432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lankisch PG, Pflichthofer D, Lehnick D (2000) No strict correlation between necrosis and organ failure in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 20(3):319–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Perez A, et al. (2002) Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis? Pancreas 25(3):229–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bai Y, et al. (2008) Prophylactic antibiotics cannot reduce infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 103(1):104–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Villatoro E, Mulla M, Larvin M (2010) Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(5):CD002941Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Balthazar EJ, et al. (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ (1990) Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localising pancreatic necrosis. BMJ 300(6737):1425–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Sarr MG (1991) CT of acute pancreatitis: correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156(1):93–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sainio VS, et al. (1997) Incorrect estimation of severity of acute pancreatitis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86(3):214–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Freeny PC (1993) Incremental dynamic bolus computed tomography of acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 13(3):147–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Arvanitakis M, et al. (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126(3):715–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hariri M, et al. (1994) Pseudocyst drainage predisposes to infection when pancreatic necrosis is unrecognized. Am J Gastroenterol 89(10):1781–1784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Banks PA, Gerzof SG, Sullivan JG (1988) Central cavitary necrosis: differentiation from pancreatic pseudocyst on CT scan. Pancreas 3(1):83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kemppainen E, et al. (1996) Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 83(7):924–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tann M, et al. (2003) Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: imaging findings and therapeutic implications in 26 surgically corrected patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(4):577–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sandrasegaran K, et al. (2007) Disconnection of the pancreatic duct: an important but overlooked complication of severe acute pancreatitis. Radiographics 27(5):1389–1400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Freeny PC, et al. (1998) Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(4):969–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Howard TJ, et al. (2001) Roux-en-Y internal drainage is the best surgical option to treat patients with disconnected duct syndrome after severe acute pancreatitis. Surgery 130(4):714–719 (discussion 719–21)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Amano Y, et al. (2001) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mild acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 26(1):59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stimac D, et al. (2007) The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 102(5):997–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hirota M, et al. (2002) Visualization of the heterogeneous internal structure of so-called “pancreatic necrosis” by magnetic resonance imaging in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 25(1):63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Morgan DE, et al. (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203(3):773–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gardner TB, et al. (2011) Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter US series. Gastrointest Endosc 73(4):718–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM (2011) Endoscopic placement of permanent indwelling transmural stents in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: does benefit outweigh the risks? Gastrointest Endosc 74(6):1408–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Belle S, et al. (2010) Temporary cystogastrostomy with self-expanding metallic stents for pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 42(6):493–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gluck M, et al. (2012) Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):248–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gluck M, et al. (2010) Endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces hospital stay and radiographic resources. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(12):1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hellerhoff KJ, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin administration: image quality and diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):121–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Manfredi R, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP): morphology and function. Rays 26(2):127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gillams AR, Kurzawinski T, Lees WR (2006) Diagnosis of duct disruption and assessment of pancreatic leak with dynamic secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(2):499–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Acute Pancreatitis. American College of Radiology: Appropriateness Criteria 1998, updated 2010. Available from: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonGastrointestinalImaging/acutepancreatitisDoc2.aspx. Accessed 2012
  72. 72.
    Mortele KJ, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bollen TL, et al. (2011) Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(2):386–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bollen TL, et al. (2011) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Horton KM, Fishman EK (2010) CT angiography of the mesenteric circulation. Radiol Clin North Am 48(2):331–345, viiiPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Shinya S, et al. (2009) The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(94–95):1407–1410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Thomas S, et al. (2012) Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol 19(1):5–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atif Zaheer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vikesh K. Singh
    • 2
  • Reema O. Qureshi
    • 1
  • Elliot K. Fishman
    • 1
  1. 1.Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Pancreatitis Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations