Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 82–97 | Cite as

Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned

  • Perry J. Pickhardt


Misinterpretation at CT colonography (CTC) can result in either a colorectal lesion being missed (false-negative) or a false-positive diagnosis. This review will largely focus on potential missed lesions—and ways to avoid such misses. The general causes of false-negative interpretation at CTC can be broadly characterized and grouped into discrete categories related to suboptimal study technique, specific lesion characteristics, anatomic location, and imaging artifacts. Overlapping causes further increase the likelihood of missing a clinically relevant lesion. In the end, if the technical factors of bowel preparation, colonic distention, and robust CTC software are adequately addressed on a consistent basis, and the reader is aware of all the potential pitfalls at CTC, important lesions will seldom be missed.


CT colonography Virtual colonoscopy Interpretation Pitfalls Colorectal polyps 


  1. 1.
    Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R (2011) Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 259:393–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR (2004) Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141:352–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pickhardt PJ, Wise SM, Kim DH (2010) Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography. Eur Radiol 20:1651–1656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zueco Zueco C, Sobrido Sampedro C, Corroto JD, et al. (2012). CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cornett D, Barancin C, Roeder B, et al. (2008) Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam. AJR Am J Roentgenol 103:2068–2074Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim DH, Pooler BD, Weiss JM, Pickhardt PJ. Five year colorectal cancer outcomes in a large negative CT colonography screening cohort. Eur Radiol 2011 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hinshaw JL, et al. (2007) Prospective blinded trial comparing 45-mL and 90-mL doses of oral sodium phosphate for bowel preparation before computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:53–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pickhardt PJ (2007) Colonic preparation for computed tomographic colonography: understanding the relative advantages and disadvantages of a noncathartic approach. Mayo Clin Proc 82:659–661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pickhardt PJ, Screening CT (2007) Colonography: how I do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:290–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JHR (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:799–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254:138–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, Pickhardt PJ (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang KJ, Rekhi SS Jr, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2011) Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:91–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:96–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1491–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD (1999) The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:169–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. (2003) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buchach CM, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2011) Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 36:538–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:126–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lubner MG, Pickhardt PJ, Tang J, Chen G-H (2011) Reduced image noise at low-dose multidetector CT of the abdomen with prior image constrained compressed sensing algorithm. Radiology 260:248–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pickhardt PJ (2008) Missed lesions at primary 2D CT colonography: further support for 3D polyp detection. Radiology 246:648–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, et al. (2007) CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 244:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christensen KN, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, MacCarty R, Johnson CD (2010) Pictorial review of colonic polyp and mass distortion and recognition with the ct virtual dissection technique. Radiographics 30:e42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pickhardt PJ (2010) Pictorial review of colonic polyp and mass distortion and recognition with the CT virtual dissection technique (invited commentary). Radiographics 30:e43Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB (2010) Flat (nonpolypoid) colorectal lesions identified at CT colonography in a US screening population. Acad Radiol 17:784–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1343–1347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. (2008) Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299:1027–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2008) Computerized tomography colonography: a primer for gastroenterologists. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 6:497–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135:1100–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2010) Performance of CT colonography for detecting small, diminutive, and flat polyps. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20:209–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Schindler WR (2004) Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 232:784–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pickhardt PJ (2004) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiographics 24:1535–1556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR (2005) Adenomatous polyp obscured by small-caliber rectal catheter at low-dose CT colonography: a rare diagnostic pitfall. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1581–1583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Iafrate F, Rengo M, Ferrari R, et al. (2007) Spectrum of normal findings, anatomic variants and pathology of ileocecal valve: CT colonography appearances and endoscopic correlation. Abdom Imaging 32:589–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pickhardt PJ (2004) Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:429–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sanford MF, Pickhardt PJ (2006) Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1039–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:774–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Flor N, Rigamonti P, Di Leo G, et al. (2012) Technical quality of CT colonography in relation with diverticular disease. Eur J Radiol 81:e250–e254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Boyce CJ, Vetter JR, Pickhardt PJ (2012) MDCT artifact related to the intra-scan gravitational flow of opacified luminal fluid (the “Dense Waterfall” sign). Abdom Imaging 37:292–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2010) CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. Philadelphia: SaundersGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Nugent PA, Schindler WR (2004) The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1661–1665PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science CenterMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations