Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 241–245 | Cite as

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors

  • Silvio MazziottiEmail author
  • Fabrizio Zimbaro
  • Alessia Pandolfo
  • Sergio Racchiusa
  • Nicola Settineri
  • Giorgio Ascenti


Background: Within the term “pseudotumors” are grouped some renal anatomic variations that may simulate a focal renal lesion at ultrasonography. Our purpose was to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using a second-generation contrast agent in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved CEUS examinations performed in 24 patients for characterization of suspected renal pseudotumor, in which conventional and power Doppler US study had been unable to confidently exclude a neoplasm. The considered criterion to define the diagnosis of renal pseudotumor was the demonstration of the same perfusion and reperfusion after microbubble breakage in both pseudotumor and surrounding parenchyma during early and late corticomedullary phase. In all patients, multiphase CT or dynamic MRI was available, representing a standard of reference for this study. In cases of CT or MRI diagnosis of renal lesion, final diagnoses were obtained with percutaneous renal biopsy or with surgery. Results: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography diagnosis was concordant with MR or CT images in all cases. Conclusion: In our experience CEUS shows complete concordance with CT and MRI in the characterization of all 24 pseudotumors considered dubious at conventional and power Doppler US. The appropriate use of CEUS can reduce the need for contrast-enhanced CT or dynamic MRI in this item.


CEUS Pseudotumors Kidney CT MR 


  1. 1.
    Marchal G, Verbeken E, Ogen R et al. Ultrasound of the normal kidney: a sonographic, anatomic and histologic correlation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986; 12: 999–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helenon O, Correas JM, Balleyguier C et al. Ultrasound of renal tumors. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1890–1901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paspulati RM, Bhatt S. Sonography in benign and malignant renal masses. Ultrasound Clin 2006; 1: 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simpson EL, Mintz MC, Pollack HM et al. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10: 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tello R, Davison BD, O’Malley M et al.MR imaging of renal masses interpreted on CT to be suspicious. AJR 2000; 174: 1017–1022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2496–2499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG. Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41: 963–978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsson A: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys. Eur Radiol 2004; 8(Suppl): 104–109.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tranquart F, Correas JM, Martegani A, Greppi B, Bokor D: Feasability of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal disease. J Radiol 2004; 85: 31–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Setola SV, Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Siani A. Contrast-enhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 2007; 31:21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 217–218Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yeh HC, Halton KP, Shapiro RS et al. Junctional parenchyma: revised definition of hypertrophic column of Bertin. Radiology 1992; 185: 725–732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patriquin H, Lefaivre JF, Lafortune M et al. Fetal lobation. An anatomo-ultrasonographic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 191–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lafortune M, Constantin A, Breton A, Vallee C. Sonography of the hypertrophied column of Bertin. AJR 1986; 146: 53–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardwick D, Hendry GMA. Ultrasonic appearances of the septa of Bertin in children. Clin radiol 1984; 35: 107–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jinzaki M, Ohkuma T, Tanimoto A et al. Small solid renal lesion: usefulness of power Doppler US. Radiology 1998; 209: 543–550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robbin ML. Sonographic contrast agents in the kidney. In: Nanda NC, Schlief R, Goldberg BB (eds). Advances in echo imaging using contrast enhancement. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997: 525–541.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bauer A, Hauff P, Lazenby J, et al. (1999) Wideband harmonic imaging: a novel contrast ultrasound imaging technique. Eur Radiol 9(Suppl 3):364–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Mazziotti S et al. Contrast-Enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. AJR 2004;182:1525–1530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barr RG, Robbin ML, Peterson C: Definity-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the kidney in patients with indeterminate masses: value of contrast harmonic imaging with bolus and infusion administration. Radiology 2001; 221 (suppl.): 316.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quaia E, Siracusano S, Bertolotto M et al.: Characterization of renal tumours with pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high mechanical index technique: initial results. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1402–1412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F, Helenon O. The Kidney: Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents. Ultrasound Q 2006; 22:53–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F, Correas JM, Darge K, Dietrich C, D’onofrio M, Evans DH, Filice C, Greiner L, Jager K, de Long N, Leen E, Lencioni R, Lindsell D, Martegani A, Meairs S, Nolsoe C, Piscaglia F, Ricci P, seidel G, Skjoldbye B, Solbiati L, Thorelius L, Tranquart F, Weskott HP, Whittingham T. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)—update 2008. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 28–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvio Mazziotti
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fabrizio Zimbaro
    • 1
  • Alessia Pandolfo
    • 1
  • Sergio Racchiusa
    • 1
  • Nicola Settineri
    • 1
  • Giorgio Ascenti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological SciencesUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly
  2. 2.MessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations