Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 225–234 | Cite as

CEUS in abdominal trauma: multi-center study

  • Orlando Catalano
  • Luca Aiani
  • Libero Barozzi
  • Daniela Bokor
  • Armanda De Marchi
  • Carlo Faletti
  • Fabio Maggioni
  • Nicola Montanari
  • Paolo Emilio Orlandi
  • Alfredo Siani
  • Paul S. Sidhu
  • Peter K. Thompson
  • Massimo Valentino
  • Angelo Ziosi
  • Alberto Martegani


The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance of US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) with CT in the assessment of solid organ injury following blunt trauma. Patients underwent complete US examination, including free fluid search and solid organ analysis. CEUS followed, using low-mechanical index techniques and SonoVue. CT was performed within 1 h. Among 156 enrolled patients, 91 had one or more abnormalities (n = 107) at CT: 26 renal, 38 liver, 43 spleen. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for renal trauma at baseline US were 36%, 98%, and 88%, respectively, after CEUS values increased to 69%, 99%, and 94%. For liver baseline US values were 68%, 97%, and 90%; after CEUS were 84%, 99%, and 96%. For spleen, results were 77%, 96%, and 91% at baseline US and 93%, 99%, and 97% after CEUS. Per patient evaluation gave the following results in terms of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy: 79%, 82%, 80% at baseline US; 94%, 89%, and 92% following CEUS. CEUS is more sensitive than US in the detection of solid organ injury, potentially reducing the need for further imaging. False negatives from CEUS are due to minor injuries, without relevant consequences for patient management and prognosis.


Abdomen trauma Liver trauma Spleen trauma Kidney trauma Trauma sonography Sonography contrast media 



Authors are in debt with Massimo Di Maio, M.D., for providing statistical analysis.


  1. 1.
    Scaglione M (2004) The use of sonography versus computed tomography in the triage of blunt abdominal trauma: the European perspective. Emerg Radiol 10:296–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shih H-C, Wen Y-S, Ko T-J, et al. (1999) Noninvasive evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: prospective study using diagnostic algorithms to minimize nontherapeutic laparotomy. World J Surg 23:265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dolich MO, McKenney MG, Varela JE, et al. (2001) 2,576 ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 50:108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKenney KL, Nunez DB, McKenney MG, et al. (1998) Sonography as primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma: experience with 899 patients. AJR 170:979–985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rothlin MA, Naef R, Amgwerd M, et al. (1993) Ultrasound in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma. J Trauma 34:488–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bokor D, Chambers JB, Rees PJ, et al. (2001) Clinical safety of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol 36:104–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morel DR, Schwieger I, Hohn L, et al. (2000) Human pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of SonoVueTM, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging. Invest Radiol 35:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown MA, Casola G, Sirlin CB, et al. (2001) Blunt abdominal trauma: screening US in 2,693 patients. Radiology 218:352–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richards JR, Knopf NA, Wang L, et al. (2002) Blunt abdominal trauma in children: evaluation with emergency US. Radiology 222:749–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sirlin CB, Brown MA, Andrade-Barreto OA, et al. (2004) Blunt abdominal trauma: clinical value of negative screening US scans. Radiology 230:661–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tas F, Ceran C, Atalar MH, et al. (2004) The efficacy of ultrasonography in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 51:91–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lingawi SS, Buckley AR (2000) Focused abdominal US in patients with trauma. Radiology 217:426–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emery KH, McAneney CM, Racadio JM, et al. (2001) Absent peritoneal fluid on screening trauma ultrasonography in children: a prospective comparison with computed tomography. J Pediatr Surg 36:565–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poletti P-A, Kinkel K, Vermeulen B, et al. (2003) Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries? Radiology 227:95–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poletti P-A, Wintermark M, Schnyder P, et al. (2002) Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of polytrauma victim (conservative expectation). Eur Radiol 12:969–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taylor GA, Sivit CJ (1995) Posttraumatic peritoneal fluid: is it a reliable indicator of intraabdominal injury in children? J Pediatr Surg 30:1644–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thorelius L (2004) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in trauma. Eur Radiol 14 (suppl 8): P43–P52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thorelius L (2003) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: beyond the liver. Eur Radiol 13:N91–N108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chiu WC, Cushing BM, Rodriguez A, et al. (1997) Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). J Trauma 42:617–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Sherbourne CD, et al. (1999) Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation for screening abdominal US for trauma. Radiology 212:423–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ochsner MG, Knudson MM, Pachter HL, et al. (2000) Significance of minimal or no intraperitoneal fluid visible on CT scan associated with blunt liver and splenic injuries: a multicenter analysis. J Trauma 49:505–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoshii H, Sato M, Yamamoto S, et al. (1998) Usefulness and limitations of ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 45:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poletti PA, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, et al. (2000) CT criteria for management of blunt liver trauma: correlation with angiographic and surgical findings. Radiology 216:418–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stengel D, Bauwens K, Sehouli J et al. (2001) Discriminatory power of 3.5 MHz convex and 7.5 MHz linear ultrasound probes for the imaging of traumatic splenic lesions: a feasibility study. J Trauma 51:37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schiemann U (2004) Ultrasound in emergency patients: better detection of free intraabdominal fluids by use of tissue harmonic imaging. Eur J Med Res 30:328–332Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blaivas M, DeBehnke D, Sierzenski PR, et al. (2002) Tissue harmonic imaging improves organ visualization in trauma ultrasound when compared to standard ultrasound mode. Acad Emerg Med 9:48–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nilsson A, Loren I, Nirhov N, et al. (1999) Power Doppler ultrasonography: alternative to computed tomography in abdominal trauma patients. J Ultrasound Med 18:669–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Catalano O, Lobianco R, Sandomenico F, et al. (2003) Splenic trauma: evaluation with contrast-specific sonography and a second-generation contrast medium: preliminary experience. J Ultrasound Med 22:467–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Catalano O, Lobianco R, Mattace Raso M, et al. (2005) Blunt hepatic trauma: evaluation with contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 24:299–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oldenburg A, Hohmann J, Skrok J, et al. (2004) Imaging of paediatric splenic injury with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol 34:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blaivas M, Lyon M, Brannam L, et al. (2005) Feasibility of FAST examination performance with ultrasound contrast. J Emerg Med 29:307–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yao DC, Jeffrey RB, Mirvis SE, et al. (2002) Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma. AJR 178:17–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang JF, Chen RJ, Wong YC, et al. (2000) Classification and treatment of pooling of contrast material computed tomographic scan of blunt hepatic trauma. J Trauma 49:1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willmann JK, Roos JE, Platz A, et al. (2002) Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR 179:437–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu J-B, et al. (1998) Evaluation of bleeding sites with a tissue-specific sonographic contrast agent: preliminary experiences in an animal model. J Ultrasound Med 17:609–616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu J-B, Merton DA, Goldberg BB, et al. (2000) Contrast-enhanced two- and three-dimensional sonography for evaluation of intra-abdominal hemorrhage. J Ultrasound Med 21:161–169Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poletti PA, Platon A, Becker CD, et al. (2004) Blunt abdominal trauma: does the use of a second-generation sonographic contrast agent help to detect solid organ injuries? AJR 183:1293–1301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Catalano O, Cusati B, Nunziata A, et al. (2006) Active abdominal bleeding: contrast-enhanced sonography. Abdom Imaging 31:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, et al. (2004) Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound—January 2004. Ultraschall Med 25:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goan YG, Huang MS, Lin JM (1998) Nonoperative management for extensive hepatic and splenic injuries with significant hemoperitoneum in adults. J Trauma 45:360–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pachter HL, Knudson MM, Esrig B, et al. (1996) Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients. J Trauma 40:31–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Parks RW, Chrysos R, Diamond T (1999) Management of liver trauma. Br J Surg 86:1121–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Navarro O, Babyn PS, Pearl RH (2000) The value of routine follow-up imaging in pediatric blunt liver trauma. Pediatr Radiol 30:546–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cuff RF, Cogbill TH, Lambert PJ (2000) Nonoperative management of blunt liver trauma: the value of follow-up abdominal computed tomography scans. Am Surg 66:332–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mizzi A, Shabani A, Watt A (2002) The role of follow-up imaging in paediatric blunt abdominal trauma. Clin Radiol 57:908–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Miele V, Buffa V, Stassolla A, et al. (2004) Contrast enhanced ultrasound with second generation contrast agent in traumatic liver lesions. Radiol Med 107:82–91Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kim JH, Eun HW, Lee HK, et al. (2003) Renal perfusion abnormality. Coded harmonic angio US with contrast agent. Acta Radiol 44:166–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orlando Catalano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Luca Aiani
    • 3
  • Libero Barozzi
    • 4
  • Daniela Bokor
    • 5
  • Armanda De Marchi
    • 6
  • Carlo Faletti
    • 6
  • Fabio Maggioni
    • 5
  • Nicola Montanari
    • 7
  • Paolo Emilio Orlandi
    • 7
  • Alfredo Siani
    • 1
  • Paul S. Sidhu
    • 8
  • Peter K. Thompson
    • 9
  • Massimo Valentino
    • 4
  • Angelo Ziosi
    • 4
  • Alberto Martegani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyI.N.T. PascaleNaplesItaly
  2. 2.NaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyValduce HospitalComoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Emergency RadiologyS.Orsola-Malpighi HospitalBolognaItaly
  5. 5.Imaging Guided & Integrated Technology DepartmentBracco Imaging SpAMilanItaly
  6. 6.Department of RadiologyC.T.O.TurinItaly
  7. 7.Department of RadiologyMaggiore HospitalBolognaItaly
  8. 8.Department of RadiologyKing’s College HospitalLondonUK
  9. 9.Department of Accident and EmergencyCollege HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations