Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 452–458 | Cite as

Capsule enteroscopy of the small intestine

  • Matti Waterman
  • Rami EliakimEmail author


The advent of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in 2000 has dramatically changed the diagnosis and management of many diseases of the small intestine. In this review we discuss the procedure, the various indications and contraindications, adverse effects, and future prospects of VCE. VCE has a significant role in the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal hemorrhage and Crohn’s disease and has the highest diagnostic yield in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. Furthermore, VCE has gained an important role in the management and surveillance of suspected small bowel tumors and in patients with polyposis syndromes. Capsule enteroscopy may have a role in the work-up of symptomatic celiac disease and in the assessment of drug therapeutic efficacy and adverse small bowel effects. Although VCE is relatively non-invasive, it is contraindicated in patients with swallowing disorders, known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, strictures, or fistulas, and in patients with implanted electromedical devices. Other contraindications include pregnancy and children under 10. Capsule retention is the most feared complication of VCE with a frequency of 1%–2%. Risk factors and management of capsule retention are also discussed. It is probable that new indications for VCE will evolve and technological improvements will refine VCE’s diagnostic accuracy and simplify video reviewing.


Capsule endoscopy Small intestine Video capsule Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding Capsule enteroscopy Crohn's disease 


  1. 1.
    Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P (2000) Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 455:417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eliakim AR (2006) Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel (PillCam SB). Curr Opin Gastroenterol 22:124–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mergener K, Ponchon T, Gralnek I et al (2007) Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007. Endoscopy 39:895–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Niv Y (2008) Efficiency of bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy examination: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 14:1313–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rockey DC (2006) Gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 289–290Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gralnek IM (2005) Obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 128:1424–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al (2005) Meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2407–2418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marmo R, Rotondano G, Rondonotti E et al (2007) Capsule enteroscopy vs. other diagnostic procedures in diagnosing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a cost-effectiveness study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:535–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang SJ, Haber GB (2004) Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Ciln N Am 14:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E et al (2004) Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 126:643–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferguson A, Brydon WG, Brian H et al (1996) Use of whole gut perfusion to investigate gastrointestinal blood loss in patients with iron deficiency anaemia. Gut 38:120–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Apostolopoulos P, Liatsos C, Gralnek IM et al (2006) The role of wireless capsule endoscopy in investigating unexplained iron deficiency anemia after negative endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastro−intestinal tract. Endoscopy 38:1127–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Annibale B, Capurso G, Baccini F et al (2003) Role of small bowel investigation in iron deficiency anaemia after negative endoscopic/histologic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Dig Liver Dis 35:784–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sands BE (2006) Crohn's disease. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 2467–2477Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al (2006) A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 101:954–964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Tuyl SA, van Noorden JT, Stolk MF et al (2007) Clinical consequences of videocapsule endoscopy in GI bleeding and Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1164–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A, et al. (2008). Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. [Mar 19, Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crohn's disease (2006) International conference on capsule endoscopy (ICCE)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bourreille A, Jarry M, D’Hallins PN et al (2006) Wireless capsule endoscopy versus ileocolonoscopy for the diagnosis of post operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease: a prospective study. Gut 55:978–983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maunoury V, Savoye G, Bourreille A et al (2007) Value of capsule endoscopy in patients with indeterminate colitis (inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified). Inflam Bowel Dis 13:152–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hopper AD, Sidhu R, Hurlestone DP et al (2007) Capsule endoscopy: an alternative to duodenal biopsy for the recognition of villous atrophy in coeliac disease? Dig Liv Dis 39:145–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, et al. (2007) Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy 39:455–458. (Erratum in: Endoscopy 2007; 39:672)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krauss N, Schuppan D (2006) Monitoring nonresponsive patients who have celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 16:317–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwartz GD, Barkin JS (2007) Small bowel tumors detected by wireless capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 52:1026–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carey EJ, Leighton JA, Heigh RI et al (2007) A single-center experience of 260 consecutive patients undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 102:89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bailey AA, Debinski H, Appleyard M et al (2006) Diagnosis and outcome of small bowel tumors found by capsule endoscopy: a three-center Australian experience. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2237–2243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gay J, Delvaux M (2008) Small bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 40:140–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Itzkowitz SH, Rochester J (2006) Colonic polyps and polyposis syndromes. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds) Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management 8th edition. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp. 2741–2743Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schulmann K, Hollerbach S, Kraus K et al (2005) Feasibility and diagnostic utility of video capsule endoscopy for the detection of small bowel polyps in patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol 100:27–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wong RF, Tuteja AK, Haslem DS et al (2006) Video capsule endoscopy compared with standard endoscopy for the evaluation of small−bowel polyps in persons with familial adenomatous polyposis [with video]. Gastrointest Endosc 64:530–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mata A, Llach J, Castells A et al (2005) A prospective trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy and barium contrast series for small−bowel surveillance in hereditary GI polyposis syndromes. Gastrointest Endosc 61:721–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B et al (2005) The use of capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess the incidence of small bowel lesions with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:133–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Theodors A et al (2005) A quantitative analysis of NSAID-induced small bowel pathology by capsule enteroscopy. Gastroenterol 128:1172–11788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF et al (2005) Visible small intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:55–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yakoub-Agha I, Maunoury V, Wacrenier A et al (2004) Impact of small bowel exploration using video-capsule endoscopy in the management of acute graft versus host disease. Transplantation 15:1697–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ho KK, Joyce AM (2007) Complications of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 17:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R et al (2005) ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy 37:1065–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lewis B (2005) How to prevent endoscopic capsule retention. Endoscopy 37:852–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Delvaux M, Soussan EB, Laurent V et al (2005) Clinical evaluation of the use of the M2A patency capsule system before a capsule endoscopy procedure, in patients with known or suspected intestinal stenosis. Endoscopy 37:801–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Herrerias JM, Leighton JA, Costamagna G et al (2008) Agile patency system eliminates risk of capsule retention in patients with known intestinal strictures who undergo capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:902–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Selby W (2005) Complete small-bowel transit in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy: determining factors and improvement with metoclopramide. Gastrointest Endosc 61:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rondonotti E, Herrrerias J, Pennazio M et al (2005) Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 62:712–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leighton J, Sharma V, Srivathsan K et al (2004) Safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with pacemakers. Gastrointest Endosc 59:567–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Payeras G, Piqueras J, Moreno J et al (2005) Effects of capsule endoscopy on cardiac pacemakers. Endoscopy 37:1181–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Leighton J, Srivathsan K, Carey E et al (2005) Safety of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1728–1731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eliakim R, Sharma VK, Yassin K et al (2005) A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam Eso esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:572–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sharma P, Wani S, Rastogi A, et al. (2007) The diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus: a blinded, prospective study. Am J GastroenterolGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Eisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A et al (2006) The accuracy of PillCam Eso capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy 38:31–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Franchis R, Eisen GM, Laine L et al (2008) Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatology 47:1595–1603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al (2006) Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 38:963–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Bruce Rappaport, Faculty of MedicineThe Technion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations