Abdominal Imaging

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 18–20 | Cite as

Acute pancreatitis: value and impact of CT severity index

Article

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is a disease with a broad spectrum of findings that varies in severity from mild interstitial or edematous pancreas to severe forms with significant local and systemic complications that are associated with a substantial degree of morbidity and mortality. Several scoring systems are used to assess the severity and predict the outcome and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. These include the Ranson, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Glasgow scales. The CT severity index (CTSI) derived by Balthazar et al. has become widely used for description of CT findings in acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this project was to examine the current best evidence about regarding the effect of using a CTSI on patient outcome and its value in comparison with other widely used scoring systems.

Keywords

Acute pancreatitis Tomography X-ray computed Ranson CTSI Imrie APACHE II 

References

  1. 1.
    Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) Modified CT Severity Index for Evaluating Acute Pancreatitis: Improved Correlation with Patient Outcome Am. J. Roentgenol 183:1261–1265Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193:297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Rose DF, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Cynecol Obstet 139:69–81Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. (1985) Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology 156:767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Jimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancent 2:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neil J, et al. (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25:1340–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stantent R, Frey CF (1990) Comprehensive management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic abscess. Arch Surg 125:1269–1275Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol Aug 50(8):513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2—asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242(1):23–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halligan S, Altman D (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Radiology 243(1):13–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centre for evidence-based medicine, Oxford University. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. Accessed on June 11, 2007
  14. 14.
    Gurleyik G, Emir S, Kilicoglu G, et al. (2005) Computed tomography severity index APACHE II score, serum CRP concentration for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. JOP 6(6):562–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, et al. (2005) Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol 11(38):6049–6052PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Sanctis JT, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, et al. (1997) Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs. APACHE II. Clin Radiol 52(11):842–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply diagnostic radiology Lit Radiol 242:342–354Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Casas JD, Díaz R, Valderas G, et al. (2004) Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Roentgenol 182:569–574Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of RadiologistsRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland and St Vincent’s University Hospital (SVUH)DublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySt Vincent’s University Hospital (SVUH)DublinIreland
  3. 3.Department of RadiologySt Vincent’s University HospitalDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations