Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: enhanced CT vs. PET/CT
- 568 Downloads
To assess and compare the performance of CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).
Method and materials
Thirty consecutive patients with PC and scheduled for a surgery underwent a CT of the abdomen and pelvis and a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. The extent of PC was assessed precisely using the peritoneal cancer index combining the distribution of tumor throughout 11 abdominopelvic regions with a lesion size score. CT and PET/CT imaging results were compared in all patients with intraoperative findings using an interclass correlation test.
The presence of PC was correctly determined on CT and PET/CT in 23/28 and 16/28 patients, respectively. The extent of PC was understaged with CT and PET/CT in 27 patients and overstaged with CT and PET/CT in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. The interclass correlation was 0.53 (moderate) between CT and surgery and 0.12 (low) between PET/CT and surgery. The interclass correlation was higher for mucinous tumor (0.63) than for non-mucinous (0.16) on CT imaging whereas no difference was found in PET/CT.
The intraperitoneal assessment of the extent of carcinomatosis, necessary to assess prognosis and treatment planning, is not accurate enough with CT and PET/CT imaging.
KeywordsPeritoneal carcinomatosis FDG-PET Computed tomography Colorectal carcinoma Peritoneum CT Mucinous
- 2.Esquivel J, Sticca R, Sugarbaker P, et al. (2006) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: a consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol, onlineGoogle Scholar
- 6.Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in the diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In: Sugarbaker PH (eds). Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Principles of Management. Kluwer: Boston, p 370Google Scholar